12.07.2013 Views

Before Jerusalem Fell

by Kenneth L. Gentry

by Kenneth L. Gentry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Additional External Witnesses 93<br />

With this testimony before us it is not easy to doubt that Papias made<br />

some such statement, for the suggestion of a lacuna, offered by Bishop<br />

Lightfoot in 1875, is now scarcely tenable, though it has been lately<br />

revived by Harnack. But if Papias made it, the question remains<br />

whether he made it under some misapprehension, or merely by way<br />

of expressing his conviction that the prophecy of Mic. x.39 had found<br />

a literal fulfillment. Neither explanation is very probable in view of<br />

the early date of Papias. He does not, however, affh-m that the<br />

brothers suffered at the same time: the martyrdom of John at the<br />

hand of the Jews might have taken place at any date before the last<br />

days of<strong>Jerusalem</strong>.32<br />

If these two pieces of data are in fact from Papias (as Swete,<br />

Lightfoot, 33<br />

and other competent scholars are inclined to believe),<br />

they provide for those who hold to the Apostolic authorship of<br />

Revelation strong external evidence for a pre-A.D. 70 composition<br />

of Revelation. In that the excerpts, however, are not indisputably<br />

genuine, they cannot be reckoned conclusive. They serve merely as<br />

probable indicators – indicators that fit well with the mass of evidence<br />

to come.<br />

The Muratorian Canon<br />

In 1740 L. A. Muratori made his celebrated discovery and publication<br />

of a manuscript fragment that subsequently came to be<br />

known as “Canon Muratorianus.”3 4<br />

The portion of this important manuscript dealing with the canon<br />

of Scripture claims to have been written by someone who was a<br />

contemporary of Pius, bishop of Rome, sometime between A.D. 127<br />

and 157. R. L. Harris notes (by reference to Westcott) that “the date<br />

of the Canon is admitted to be close to 170 A.D. “3 5<br />

This date was<br />

held earlier by Schaff, as well.36 Lightfoot and Harmer argue that it<br />

32. Swete, Revelation, pp. clxxix-clxxx<br />

33. Lightfoot and Harmer, &ostolic Fathas, pp. 519, 531.<br />

34. F. F. Bruce, The Booh and the Parchrmmts, 3rd ed. (Westwood, NJ: Revell, 1963),<br />

p. 109. According to James J. L. Ratton, the relevant portion of this fragment was<br />

published by Muratori in Antiq. Ital., 3:854. See Ratton, The Apoca~pse of St. John<br />

(London: R. & T. Washboume, 1912), p. 28. It is presently housed in the Ambrosian<br />

Library of Milan. It is an eighth century palimpsest and is designated: Cod. Ambros. J<br />

101 sup.<br />

35. R. Laird Harris, Ttu Inspiration and Canonicip of t)u Bible, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids:<br />

Zondervan, 1969), p. 214.<br />

36. Scha& Histo~ 1:776.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!