Liberating Planet Earth
by Gary DeMar by Gary DeMar
The Inevitabiiip of Liberation 141 beginning with self-government under Biblical law. They do not believe that Biblical law produces social peace and prosperity. Thus, fearing the responsibilities of dominion because they mistake dominion for tyrannical power, and because they do not want to be labeled Christian tyrants, Christians: (1) seek to become powerful themselves in terms of humanism’s acceptable political strategies; (2) seek an alliance with humanistic power religionists against the dominion religion; or (3) retreat from the public arena in an attempt to escape responsibility. Christians generally do not believe that God in His providence designed the mind of man for the purpose of man’s taking dominion. They do not believe that regenerate minds that necessarily possess the mind of Christ (1 Corinthians 2:16) are dominically superior to unregenerate minds that have the mind of Satan. Thus, Christians have retreated time and again in the cultural and intellectual battles. They have justified these repeated retreats by devising eschatologies of inevitable, guaranteed defeat for the visible kingdom of God. This makes it easier to run up the white flag. “What else could we expect but defeat? After all, we’re Christians.” Our enemies have stolen the Bible’s vision of victory and its doctrine of providence. They have reworked these doctrines to fit their requirements. Christians are fearfi.d of an enemy army that hus stolen eve~thing positive that it has in its arsenal. Christians do not see that it is our God who makes the rules. In contrast, our enemy knows what wins. Satan cannot win if his followers cling to his own doctrine of chaos. This is why he has stolen our vision and worldview. Who has the right to adopt such a program of victory? Whose Commander gave a death blow to His rival’s head (Genesis 3:15) at Calvary? Admittedly, the church suffers from a limp, just as Jacob did (Genesis 32:25). The church’s heel is injured, just as God promised that Christ’s would be (Genesis 3:15). But the enemy’s head is crushed. When going into battle, which wound would you prefer to march with? A crushed head or an injured heel? Unbelievers appear to be culturally dominant today. Chris-
142 Liberating Pkmet Earth tians have for too long seen themselves as the dogs sitting beneath the humanists’ tables, hoping for an occasional scrap of unenriched white bread to fhll their way. They worry about their own competence. They think of themselves as second-class citizens. And the humanists, having spotted this self-imposed “second-class citizen” mentality, have taken advantage of it. The Five Doctrines for Dominion on Earth Believers have for over a century retreated into antinomian pietism and pessimism. This retreat began in the 1870’s. They have lost the vision of victory which once motivated Christians to evangelize and then take over the Roman Empire. They have abandoned faith in one or more of the five features of Christian social philosophy that make progress possible: (1) the absolute sovereignty of the Creator God; (2) God’s covenant that governs all men; (3) the tool of the covenant, Biblical kzw; (4) Biblical presuppositionalism - the self-attesting truth of an infdible Bible, which is the ultimate judge of everything; and (5) the dynamic of eschatolo@al optimism. We should conclude, then, that either the dissolution of modern humanist culture is at hand, or else the regenerate must regain sight of their lost theological heritage: dominion optimism and Biblical law. The Communists have a perverted version of all five points. This is why they are such powerful rivals to Christians. First, they believe in the sovereignty of man, as manifested in our day by the Communist Party, the “vanguard of the proletariat,” which is infallible. Second, they believe in a covenant: membership in the Communist Party, which is rigorously hierarchical. Third, they believe that socialist law, socialist institutions, and socialist everything are the product of a unique philosophy. They believe in their exclusive way of accomplishing things. Fourth, they believe in the providence of the impersonal forces of dialectical history, which their leaders alone understand perfectly in any historical period. The Party executes infallible judgments because it has access to their “holy writ”: Marxism-Leninism. They do not appeal to any other logic, any other source of authority except their own
- Page 98 and 99: T&Liberation of the Church 91 are r
- Page 100 and 101: The Liberation of the Church 93 Per
- Page 102 and 103: The Liberation of th Church 95 For
- Page 104 and 105: Th Liberation of the Church 97 mann
- Page 106 and 107: The Liberation of the Church 99 5.
- Page 108 and 109: The Liberation of the State 101 and
- Page 110 and 111: The Liberation of the State 103 wil
- Page 112 and 113: 4 The Liberation of the State 105 p
- Page 114 and 115: Th Liberation of the State 107 cult
- Page 116 and 117: The Liberation of tk State 109 fata
- Page 118 and 119: . Thg Liberation of the State, 111
- Page 120 and 121: The Liberation of the State 113 man
- Page 122 and 123: Th Liberation of the State 115 13.
- Page 124 and 125: The Liberation of the Economy 117 p
- Page 126 and 127: Z&Liberation of the Ecomy 119 as th
- Page 128 and 129: The Liberation of the Economy 121 T
- Page 130 and 131: I’%e Liberation of th Economy 123
- Page 132 and 133: The Liberation of the Economy 125 w
- Page 134 and 135: T4e Liberation of th Economy 127 ch
- Page 136 and 137: 10 THE INEVITABILITY OF LIBERATION
- Page 138 and 139: The Inevitability of Liberation 131
- Page 140 and 141: The Inevitability of Liberation 133
- Page 142 and 143: The Inevitability of .Lib~ation 135
- Page 144 and 145: The lneuitabili~ of Liberation 137
- Page 146 and 147: The Inevitabilip of Liberation 139
- Page 150 and 151: Th Inevitabili& of Liberatwn 143
- Page 152 and 153: The lrzevitabili@ of Liberation 145
- Page 154 and 155: Z3.e Inevitability ~Liberation 147
- Page 156 and 157: CONCLUSION All things have been del
- Page 158 and 159: Conclusion 151 or our civil governm
- Page 160 and 161: Conclusion 153 And why would this p
- Page 162 and 163: Comdusion 1!55 ety’s institutions
- Page 164 and 165: Conclusion 157 A Liberating Gospel
- Page 166 and 167: Conclusion 159 10. We must preach t
- Page 168 and 169: 162 Liberating Planet Earth Moses a
- Page 170 and 171: 164 L@eratmg Planet Earth Deuterono
- Page 172 and 173: 166 Liberating Pla@ Earth 1 Corinth
- Page 174 and 175: 168 Liberating Planet Earth Marxism
- Page 176 and 177: 170 Liberating Planet Earth free ma
- Page 178 and 179: 172 Liberating Phnet Earth civil, 1
- Page 180 and 181: 174 Liberating Planet Earth represe
- Page 182 and 183: 176 Liberating Planet Earth w=, 18,
- Page 184 and 185: 178 Liberating Planet Earth Will th
- Page 186 and 187: 180 Liberating Planet Earth tion to
- Page 188 and 189: 182 Liberating Planet Earth the bes
- Page 190 and 191: 184 Lib~ating Planet Earth The Whol
- Page 192 and 193: 186 Liberating Pihet Earth God. It
- Page 194 and 195: 188 Liberating Phwt Earth tutional
- Page 196 and 197: 190 Lib~ating Planet Earth The Marx
The Inevitabiiip of Liberation 141<br />
beginning with self-government under Biblical law. They do not<br />
believe that Biblical law produces social peace and prosperity.<br />
Thus, fearing the responsibilities of dominion because they mistake<br />
dominion for tyrannical power, and because they do not want<br />
to be labeled Christian tyrants, Christians: (1) seek to become powerful<br />
themselves in terms of humanism’s acceptable political strategies;<br />
(2) seek an alliance with humanistic power religionists<br />
against the dominion religion; or (3) retreat from the public arena<br />
in an attempt to escape responsibility.<br />
Christians generally do not believe that God in His providence<br />
designed the mind of man for the purpose of man’s taking<br />
dominion. They do not believe that regenerate minds that necessarily<br />
possess the mind of Christ (1 Corinthians 2:16) are dominically<br />
superior to unregenerate minds that have the mind of<br />
Satan. Thus, Christians have retreated time and again in the cultural<br />
and intellectual battles. They have justified these repeated<br />
retreats by devising eschatologies of inevitable, guaranteed defeat<br />
for the visible kingdom of God. This makes it easier to run up the<br />
white flag. “What else could we expect but defeat? After all, we’re<br />
Christians.”<br />
Our enemies have stolen the Bible’s vision of victory and its<br />
doctrine of providence. They have reworked these doctrines to fit<br />
their requirements. Christians are fearfi.d of an enemy army that hus<br />
stolen eve~thing positive that it has in its arsenal. Christians do not see<br />
that it is our God who makes the rules. In contrast, our enemy<br />
knows what wins. Satan cannot win if his followers cling to his<br />
own doctrine of chaos. This is why he has stolen our vision and<br />
worldview.<br />
Who has the right to adopt such a program of victory? Whose<br />
Commander gave a death blow to His rival’s head (Genesis 3:15)<br />
at Calvary? Admittedly, the church suffers from a limp, just as<br />
Jacob did (Genesis 32:25). The church’s heel is injured, just as God<br />
promised that Christ’s would be (Genesis 3:15). But the enemy’s<br />
head is crushed. When going into battle, which wound would you<br />
prefer to march with? A crushed head or an injured heel?<br />
Unbelievers appear to be culturally dominant today. Chris-