Liberating Planet Earth
by Gary DeMar by Gary DeMar
The Liberation of the Economy 125 words in any society. Biblical preaching has, over centuries, enabled men to appreciate the importance of these two words. When the differences between the two are honored in law, word, and deed, society benefits. Men can better cooperate with each other in peaceful transactions precisely because of the predictabz’li~ provided by a social order which recognizes “mine” and “yours. n This facilitates the division of labor. We need people to cooperate rather than wage war against each other. This requires that we allow other men to do what they want with whatever they own, so long as they do not violate God’s civil laws. We must not forget the words of the owner of the vineyard in the parable of the vineyard: Is it not lawful for me to do what I want with my own things? Or is your eye evil because I am good? (Matthew 20:15). Economist Harold Demsetz has seen the importance of property rights from the perspective of social cooperation. Property rights are an instrument of society and derive their significance from the fact that they help a man form those expectations which he can reasonably hold in his dealings with others. These expectations find expression in the laws, customs, and mores of a society. An owner of property rights possesses the consent of fellow men to allow him to act in particular ways.’ Men can make contracts with each other, and enjoy the fruits of their decisions concerning the stewardship of God’s resources. To return to a now-familiar theme; prop@ rights reduce the zones of uncertainty in I$e. The State as Savior The state is a messianic institution in the modern world, and it is a destroyer of capital. The Moloch state consumes the economic future of its worshipers, and the economic future of its 7. Demsetz, “Toward a Theory of Property Rights” (1967), in E. G. Furubotn and S. Pejovich (eds. ), The Econonzics of Pro@y Rights (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger, 1974), p. 31.
126 Liberating Planet Earth worshipers’ heirs. The Moloch state, like the polluting factory, is a coercive, capital-destroying agent in the economy. But the polluting factory may provide productive employment for local residents, and it provides the consumers with lower-priced goods (lower priced than if the factory had to pay for pollution-control equipment). The state, in contrast, employs only bureaucrats, and uses its finds generally to subsidize the improvident members of society (some of whom may be quite rich), capturing them in a web of promised benefits, and destroying their incentive to work for the benefit of consumers. But how can rich people be improvident? By “improvident; I mean “one who wastes his capital, or the capital entrusted to him by others.” This certainly applies to senior executives of major industrial companies that apply to the Federal government for financial aid, tariffs, and other stolen economic goods. The very poor also suffer a reduction of their opportunities to obtain the work skills they need to advance themselves in modern economic society. The confiscatory state is a far greater threat to property and freedom than some local factory which pollutes the air or water. The modern state is a threat to human rights, for it is a threat to property rights. The modern state is a destroyer of human rights, for it is a destroyer of property rights. Guilt-ridden intellectuals, politicians, and sons of the rich have promoted an ideology of wealth-redistribution that destroys capital, and therefore destroys human aspirations. They have used the misleading slogan, %uman rights above property rights,” to destroy both human rights and property rights. They have adopted as their commandment, “Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.” The result, increasingly, is the decapitdzation of the formerly Christian West. Never forget: a state that claims to be a savior of mankhd necessarily becomes the final judge of mankind. Summary The Biblical doctrine of ownership is a doctrine of stewardship. God’s property is to be carefhlly developed by His servants. The servants have chosen to ignore God, and they have also
- Page 82 and 83: Th Liberation of the Fami~ 75 born
- Page 84 and 85: The Liberation of the Fami~ 77 the
- Page 86 and 87: Th Liberation of the Fami~ 79 ‘ l
- Page 88 and 89: The Liberation of the Farni~ 81 God
- Page 90 and 91: T&Liberation of the Fami~ 83 childr
- Page 92 and 93: The Liberation of the Fami~ 85 By a
- Page 94 and 95: 7%e Liberation of th Fami~ 87 prima
- Page 96 and 97: The Liberation of the Church 89 the
- Page 98 and 99: T&Liberation of the Church 91 are r
- Page 100 and 101: The Liberation of the Church 93 Per
- Page 102 and 103: The Liberation of th Church 95 For
- Page 104 and 105: Th Liberation of the Church 97 mann
- Page 106 and 107: The Liberation of the Church 99 5.
- Page 108 and 109: The Liberation of the State 101 and
- Page 110 and 111: The Liberation of the State 103 wil
- Page 112 and 113: 4 The Liberation of the State 105 p
- Page 114 and 115: Th Liberation of the State 107 cult
- Page 116 and 117: The Liberation of tk State 109 fata
- Page 118 and 119: . Thg Liberation of the State, 111
- Page 120 and 121: The Liberation of the State 113 man
- Page 122 and 123: Th Liberation of the State 115 13.
- Page 124 and 125: The Liberation of the Economy 117 p
- Page 126 and 127: Z&Liberation of the Ecomy 119 as th
- Page 128 and 129: The Liberation of the Economy 121 T
- Page 130 and 131: I’%e Liberation of th Economy 123
- Page 134 and 135: T4e Liberation of th Economy 127 ch
- Page 136 and 137: 10 THE INEVITABILITY OF LIBERATION
- Page 138 and 139: The Inevitability of Liberation 131
- Page 140 and 141: The Inevitability of Liberation 133
- Page 142 and 143: The Inevitability of .Lib~ation 135
- Page 144 and 145: The lneuitabili~ of Liberation 137
- Page 146 and 147: The Inevitabilip of Liberation 139
- Page 148 and 149: The Inevitabiiip of Liberation 141
- Page 150 and 151: Th Inevitabili& of Liberatwn 143
- Page 152 and 153: The lrzevitabili@ of Liberation 145
- Page 154 and 155: Z3.e Inevitability ~Liberation 147
- Page 156 and 157: CONCLUSION All things have been del
- Page 158 and 159: Conclusion 151 or our civil governm
- Page 160 and 161: Conclusion 153 And why would this p
- Page 162 and 163: Comdusion 1!55 ety’s institutions
- Page 164 and 165: Conclusion 157 A Liberating Gospel
- Page 166 and 167: Conclusion 159 10. We must preach t
- Page 168 and 169: 162 Liberating Planet Earth Moses a
- Page 170 and 171: 164 L@eratmg Planet Earth Deuterono
- Page 172 and 173: 166 Liberating Pla@ Earth 1 Corinth
- Page 174 and 175: 168 Liberating Planet Earth Marxism
- Page 176 and 177: 170 Liberating Planet Earth free ma
- Page 178 and 179: 172 Liberating Phnet Earth civil, 1
- Page 180 and 181: 174 Liberating Planet Earth represe
126 <strong>Liberating</strong> <strong>Planet</strong> <strong>Earth</strong><br />
worshipers’ heirs. The Moloch state, like the polluting factory, is<br />
a coercive, capital-destroying agent in the economy. But the<br />
polluting factory may provide productive employment for local<br />
residents, and it provides the consumers with lower-priced goods<br />
(lower priced than if the factory had to pay for pollution-control<br />
equipment). The state, in contrast, employs only bureaucrats,<br />
and uses its finds generally to subsidize the improvident<br />
members of society (some of whom may be quite rich), capturing<br />
them in a web of promised benefits, and destroying their incentive<br />
to work for the benefit of consumers.<br />
But how can rich people be improvident? By “improvident; I<br />
mean “one who wastes his capital, or the capital entrusted to him<br />
by others.” This certainly applies to senior executives of major industrial<br />
companies that apply to the Federal government for financial<br />
aid, tariffs, and other stolen economic goods.<br />
The very poor also suffer a reduction of their opportunities to<br />
obtain the work skills they need to advance themselves in modern<br />
economic society. The confiscatory state is a far greater threat to<br />
property and freedom than some local factory which pollutes the<br />
air or water.<br />
The modern state is a threat to human rights, for it is a threat to<br />
property rights. The modern state is a destroyer of human rights,<br />
for it is a destroyer of property rights. Guilt-ridden intellectuals,<br />
politicians, and sons of the rich have promoted an ideology of<br />
wealth-redistribution that destroys capital, and therefore destroys<br />
human aspirations. They have used the misleading slogan, %uman<br />
rights above property rights,” to destroy both human rights and<br />
property rights. They have adopted as their commandment, “Thou<br />
shalt not steal, except by majority vote.” The result, increasingly, is<br />
the decapitdzation of the formerly Christian West.<br />
Never forget: a state that claims to be a savior of mankhd necessarily<br />
becomes the final judge of mankind.<br />
Summary<br />
The Biblical doctrine of ownership is a doctrine of stewardship.<br />
God’s property is to be carefhlly developed by His servants.<br />
The servants have chosen to ignore God, and they have also