Liberating Planet Earth
by Gary DeMar
by Gary DeMar
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
122 <strong>Liberating</strong> Plarwt <strong>Earth</strong><br />
Property and Demoeracy<br />
The commandment against theft does not read: ‘You shall not<br />
steal, except by majority vote.” We need to have private property<br />
rights respected not just by criminals, but also by individual citizens<br />
who find that they can extract wealth from others by means<br />
of state power. Furthermore, private property rights must be<br />
respected by profit-seeking businesses that would otherwise petition<br />
the state for economic assistance: tariffs, import quotas,<br />
below-market interest rate government loans, and so forth. To<br />
violate this principle is to call for the so-called “corporate state,”<br />
another form of the welfare state — fascism, monopoly capitalism,<br />
or whatever. Whenever such a system has been constructed, it has<br />
led to reduced productivity and an increase in bureaucracy. The<br />
politicians are simply not competent enough to plan for an entire<br />
economy. To promote such a system of state planning and protection<br />
of industry is an illegitimate use of the ballot box, meaning<br />
democratic pressure politics.<br />
Let us consider an example which has been debated from the<br />
Puritan revolution of the 1640’s until today: the ~ro~tnty qual~cation<br />
for voting. In the 1640’s, the English Puritan military leader Oliver<br />
Cromwell led his forces to victory over the King, Charles the<br />
First. At the Putney Debates of Cromwell’s New Model Army in<br />
1647, Ireton, Cromwell’s son-in-law, debated Rainsborough, the<br />
representative of the democratic faction, the Levellers. (The<br />
Levellers were not communists, but they were committed to a far<br />
wider franchise. The communists in the English Revolution were<br />
the Diggers, who called themselves the “True Levelers.”)<br />
Rainsborough argued that since all men are under the laws of<br />
a nation, they deserve a voice in the affairs of civil government.<br />
Ireton countered with a ringing defense of property rights. A man<br />
must have some stake in society, meaning property to defend, if<br />
he is to be entrusted with the right to vote. Men without permanent<br />
interests in the society — property, in other words — are too<br />
dangerous when handed the power of civil government. The<br />
property qualification is crucial to preserve society in a democratic<br />
order. “And if we shall go to take away this, we shall plainly