Liberating Planet Earth

by Gary DeMar by Gary DeMar

12.07.2013 Views

Z&Liberation of the Ecomy 119 as the body of Christ, is similarly described in terms of an organic unity which is supposed to be harmonious, with each “organ” essential to the proper functioning of the whole, yet with each performing separate tasks (1 CorintMans 12). All are under Christ, the head of the church (Ephesians 5:23). God’s universe is orderly. Tlwre is a God-orhined re~.!arity in economic afairs. There is a predictable, lawful relationship between personal industriousness and wealth, between laziness and poverty. How long will you slumber, O sluggard? When will you rise from your sleep? A little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to sleep – So shall your poverty come on you like a robber, and your need like an armed man (Proverbs 6:9-11). Wealth gained by dishonesty will be diminished: but he that gathers by labor will increase (Proverbs 13:11). This applies to individuals, families, corporations, and nations. Not every godly man or organization will inevitably prosper economically, in time and on earth, and not every evil man will lose his wealth during his lifetime (Luke 16:19-31), but in the aggregate, there will be a significant correlation between cownanti faithfulness and external prospm”ty. In the long run, the wealth of the wicked is laid up for the just (Proverbs 13 :22). This same principle applies to national, cultural, and racial groups (Deuteronomy 8). Long-term poverty in a society is a sign of God’s judgment. Covenantal law governs the sphere of economics. Wealth flows to those who work hard, deal honestly with their customers, and honor God. To argue, as the Marxists and socialists do, that wealth flows in a free market social order towards those who are ruthless, dishonest, and blinded by greed, is to deny the Bible’s explicit teachings concerning the nature of economic life. It is a denial of the covenantal lawfulness of the creation. The Theology of Socialism Critics of the free market system have inflicted great damage on those societies that have accepted such criticisms as valid. Men have concluded that the private property system is rigged against

120 Liberating Planet Earth the poor and weak, forcing them into positions of permanent servitude. Historically, on the contrary, no social order has provided more opportunities for upward social mobility thun thefiee market. The remarkable advance of numerous immigrant groups, but especially of Eastern European Jews, in the United States from 1880 to 1950, is historically unprecedented.z Today, the policies of the socialist welfare state are making lifetime dependents out of a substantial minority of citizens. The modern welfare system is deeply flawed, not simply because it uses coercion to take income from the employed, but because it destroys the will of the recipients to escape from the welfare system. The politics of welfhre is also leading to class conflict. George Gilder’s words in Wealth and Povtiy are eloquent in this regard: A program to lift by transfers and preferences the incomes of less diligent groups is politically divisive–and very urdikely– because it incurs the bitter resistance of the real working class. In addition, such an effort breaks the psychological link between effort and reward, which is crucial to long-run upward mobility. Because effective work consists not in merely fulfilling the requirements of labor contracts, but in ‘putting out” with alertness and emotional commitment, workers have to understand and feel deeply that what they are given depends on what they give – that they must supply work in order to demand goods. Parents and schools must inculcate this idea in their children both by instruction and example. Nothing is more deadly to achievement than the belief that effort will not be rewarded, that the world is a bleak and discriminatory place in which only the predatory and the specially preferred can get ahead. Such a view in the home discourages the work effort in school that shapes earnings capacity afterward. As with so many aspects of human performance, work effort begins in family experiences, and its sources can be best explored through an examination of family structure. Indeed, after work the second principle of upward mobility is the maintenance of monogamous marriage and family.s 2. Thomas Sowell, Race and Economics (New York: David McKay Co., 1975), Pt. II. 3. George Gilder, WeaZth and Povtiy (New York: Basic Books, 1981), pp. 68-69.

120 <strong>Liberating</strong> <strong>Planet</strong> <strong>Earth</strong><br />

the poor and weak, forcing them into positions of permanent servitude.<br />

Historically, on the contrary, no social order has provided more<br />

opportunities for upward social mobility thun thefiee market.<br />

The remarkable advance of numerous immigrant groups, but<br />

especially of Eastern European Jews, in the United States from<br />

1880 to 1950, is historically unprecedented.z Today, the policies of<br />

the socialist welfare state are making lifetime dependents out of a<br />

substantial minority of citizens. The modern welfare system is<br />

deeply flawed, not simply because it uses coercion to take income<br />

from the employed, but because it destroys the will of the recipients<br />

to escape from the welfare system.<br />

The politics of welfhre is also leading to class conflict. George<br />

Gilder’s words in Wealth and Povtiy are eloquent in this regard:<br />

A program to lift by transfers and preferences the incomes of<br />

less diligent groups is politically divisive–and very urdikely–<br />

because it incurs the bitter resistance of the real working class. In<br />

addition, such an effort breaks the psychological link between<br />

effort and reward, which is crucial to long-run upward mobility.<br />

Because effective work consists not in merely fulfilling the requirements<br />

of labor contracts, but in ‘putting out” with alertness and<br />

emotional commitment, workers have to understand and feel<br />

deeply that what they are given depends on what they give – that<br />

they must supply work in order to demand goods. Parents and<br />

schools must inculcate this idea in their children both by instruction<br />

and example. Nothing is more deadly to achievement than the<br />

belief that effort will not be rewarded, that the world is a bleak and<br />

discriminatory place in which only the predatory and the specially<br />

preferred can get ahead. Such a view in the home discourages the<br />

work effort in school that shapes earnings capacity afterward. As<br />

with so many aspects of human performance, work effort begins in<br />

family experiences, and its sources can be best explored through<br />

an examination of family structure. Indeed, after work the second<br />

principle of upward mobility is the maintenance of monogamous<br />

marriage and family.s<br />

2. Thomas Sowell, Race and Economics (New York: David McKay Co., 1975),<br />

Pt. II.<br />

3. George Gilder, WeaZth and Povtiy (New York: Basic Books, 1981), pp. 68-69.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!