Liberating Planet Earth
by Gary DeMar by Gary DeMar
Th Liberation of the State 107 cultural activity by his overriding sense of guilt and his masochistic activity. He will progressively demand of the state a redemptive role. What he cannot do personally, i.e., to save himself, he demands that the state do for him, so that the state, as man enlarged, becomes the human savior of man. The politics of guilt, therefore, is not directed, as the Christian politics of liberty, to the creation of godly justice and order, but to the creation of a redeeming order, a saving state (p. 9). Christian jurisprudence cannot adopt a doctrine of the saving state and remain orthodox. The adoption of just such a concept of the state in the twentieth century testifies to the extent to which the modern world has abandoned Christian orthodoxy. Jamming the System One of the most important aspects of any legal order is the willingness of the citizens of a society to exercise self-restraint. This means that men must emphasize se~-gozmnment, as well as gain access to court systems that serve as alternatives to civil government. This was a basic feature of the Western legal tradition after the mid-twelfth century, although since World War I, the rise of socialistic administrative states has begun to undermine this tradition, according to Professor Harold Berman of Harvard in his important book, Law and Resolution (Harvard University Press, 1983). He says that this development now threatens the survival of freedom in the West. Self-government is not a zero-price resource. The emphasis in the Bible on training up children in the details of Biblical law must be understood as a requirement of citizens to provide “social overhead capital” for civilization: respect for law and therefore self-restraint. Another aspect of the public’s respect for civil law is the se~-restraint of government oficials in not burdening the society with a massive, incomprehensible structure of administrative law. When civil law reaches into every aspect of the daily lives of men, the state loses a very important subsidy from the public, namely, men’s willingness to submit voluntarily to the civil law. Any legal structure is vulnerable to the foot-dragging of the pub-
108 Liberating Planet Earth lie. If men refuse to submit to regulations that cannot be enforced, one by one, by the legal system, then that system will be destroyed. Court-jamming will paralyze it. This is a familiar phenomenon in the United States in the final decades of the twentieth century. It is possible to bring down any legal system simply by taking advantage of every legal avenue of delay. Any administrative system has procedural rules; by following these rules so closely that action on the part of the authorities becomes hopelessly bogged down in red tape (procedural details), the protectors can paralyze the system. Too many laws can produce lawlessness. The courts can no longer enforce their will on the citizens. At the same time, administrative agencies can destroy individual citizens, knowing that citizens must wait too long to receive justice in the courts. The result is a combination of anarchy and tyranny: the antinomian legacy. Recognizing Our Limitations What we can and should strive for is to conform our human law codes to the explicit requirements of the Ten Commandments and the case-law applications of Biblical law. The answer to our legal crisis is not to be found in the hypothetical perfection of formal law, nor can it be found in the hypothetical perfection of substantive (ethical) justice. Judges will make errors, but these errors can be minimized by placing them within the framework of Biblical law. Before God gave the nation of Israel a comprehensive system of law, Jethro gave Israel a comprehensive system of decentralized courts. By admitting the impossibility of the g~al for earthly perfect justice, Moses made possible the reign of imperfectly applied revealed law: perfect in principle, but inevitably flawed in application. The messianic goal of a perfect law-order, in time and on earth, was denied to Moses and his successors. One of the most obvious failures of the modem administrative civil government system is its quest for perfect justice and perfect control over the details of economic life. The implicit assertion of omniscience on the part of the central planners is economically
- Page 64 and 65: The Covenant of Liberation 57 Satan
- Page 66 and 67: The Covenant of Liberation 59 all l
- Page 68 and 69: The Covenant of Liberation 61 their
- Page 70 and 71: The Liberation of the Individual 63
- Page 72 and 73: The Liberation of the Individual 65
- Page 74 and 75: The Liberation of tb Individual 67
- Page 76 and 77: The Liberation of the Individual 69
- Page 78 and 79: i’%e Liberation of the Individual
- Page 80 and 81: 6 THE LIBERATION OF THE FAMILY Hono
- Page 82 and 83: Th Liberation of the Fami~ 75 born
- Page 84 and 85: The Liberation of the Fami~ 77 the
- Page 86 and 87: Th Liberation of the Fami~ 79 ‘ l
- Page 88 and 89: The Liberation of the Farni~ 81 God
- Page 90 and 91: T&Liberation of the Fami~ 83 childr
- Page 92 and 93: The Liberation of the Fami~ 85 By a
- Page 94 and 95: 7%e Liberation of th Fami~ 87 prima
- Page 96 and 97: The Liberation of the Church 89 the
- Page 98 and 99: T&Liberation of the Church 91 are r
- Page 100 and 101: The Liberation of the Church 93 Per
- Page 102 and 103: The Liberation of th Church 95 For
- Page 104 and 105: Th Liberation of the Church 97 mann
- Page 106 and 107: The Liberation of the Church 99 5.
- Page 108 and 109: The Liberation of the State 101 and
- Page 110 and 111: The Liberation of the State 103 wil
- Page 112 and 113: 4 The Liberation of the State 105 p
- Page 116 and 117: The Liberation of tk State 109 fata
- Page 118 and 119: . Thg Liberation of the State, 111
- Page 120 and 121: The Liberation of the State 113 man
- Page 122 and 123: Th Liberation of the State 115 13.
- Page 124 and 125: The Liberation of the Economy 117 p
- Page 126 and 127: Z&Liberation of the Ecomy 119 as th
- Page 128 and 129: The Liberation of the Economy 121 T
- Page 130 and 131: I’%e Liberation of th Economy 123
- Page 132 and 133: The Liberation of the Economy 125 w
- Page 134 and 135: T4e Liberation of th Economy 127 ch
- Page 136 and 137: 10 THE INEVITABILITY OF LIBERATION
- Page 138 and 139: The Inevitability of Liberation 131
- Page 140 and 141: The Inevitability of Liberation 133
- Page 142 and 143: The Inevitability of .Lib~ation 135
- Page 144 and 145: The lneuitabili~ of Liberation 137
- Page 146 and 147: The Inevitabilip of Liberation 139
- Page 148 and 149: The Inevitabiiip of Liberation 141
- Page 150 and 151: Th Inevitabili& of Liberatwn 143
- Page 152 and 153: The lrzevitabili@ of Liberation 145
- Page 154 and 155: Z3.e Inevitability ~Liberation 147
- Page 156 and 157: CONCLUSION All things have been del
- Page 158 and 159: Conclusion 151 or our civil governm
- Page 160 and 161: Conclusion 153 And why would this p
- Page 162 and 163: Comdusion 1!55 ety’s institutions
Th Liberation of the State 107<br />
cultural activity by his overriding sense of guilt and his masochistic<br />
activity. He will progressively demand of the state a redemptive<br />
role. What he cannot do personally, i.e., to save himself, he demands<br />
that the state do for him, so that the state, as man enlarged,<br />
becomes the human savior of man. The politics of guilt, therefore,<br />
is not directed, as the Christian politics of liberty, to the creation of<br />
godly justice and order, but to the creation of a redeeming order, a<br />
saving state (p. 9).<br />
Christian jurisprudence cannot adopt a doctrine of the saving<br />
state and remain orthodox. The adoption of just such a concept of<br />
the state in the twentieth century testifies to the extent to which<br />
the modern world has abandoned Christian orthodoxy.<br />
Jamming the System<br />
One of the most important aspects of any legal order is the<br />
willingness of the citizens of a society to exercise self-restraint.<br />
This means that men must emphasize se~-gozmnment, as well as<br />
gain access to court systems that serve as alternatives to civil government.<br />
This was a basic feature of the Western legal tradition<br />
after the mid-twelfth century, although since World War I, the rise<br />
of socialistic administrative states has begun to undermine this<br />
tradition, according to Professor Harold Berman of Harvard in<br />
his important book, Law and Resolution (Harvard University<br />
Press, 1983). He says that this development now threatens the<br />
survival of freedom in the West.<br />
Self-government is not a zero-price resource. The emphasis in<br />
the Bible on training up children in the details of Biblical law<br />
must be understood as a requirement of citizens to provide “social<br />
overhead capital” for civilization: respect for law and therefore<br />
self-restraint. Another aspect of the public’s respect for civil law is<br />
the se~-restraint of government oficials in not burdening the society<br />
with a massive, incomprehensible structure of administrative law.<br />
When civil law reaches into every aspect of the daily lives of<br />
men, the state loses a very important subsidy from the public,<br />
namely, men’s willingness to submit voluntarily to the civil law.<br />
Any legal structure is vulnerable to the foot-dragging of the pub-