Rapture Fever
by Gary North
by Gary North
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
206 RAPTURE FEVER<br />
believed what they have been told for the last two centuries.<br />
Except for postmillennialism, which is believed by very few<br />
Christians, the other systems of eschatological interpretation<br />
offer only historical despair. But the pretribulational system<br />
offers a glimmer of hope in the darkness of historical despair,<br />
namely, an escape from history the <strong>Rapture</strong>.<br />
“We’re under grace, not law.” So runs the theology of most<br />
Protestants. But pretribulational dispensationalists assert a<br />
radical judicial discontinuity with both the past and the future.<br />
Today’s Christians, they argue, have escaped the heavy moral<br />
burdens of law-enforcement in history, unlike Israel prior to<br />
the cross and also during the millennial era to come. Victmy in<br />
history is correctlj seen by dispensationalists as Christians’ ability to<br />
enforce Godk law, bringing sanctions in terms of it, including cim”l<br />
sanctions. But this ability supposedly has nothing to do with the<br />
Church during the Church Age. Christians therefore need not<br />
concern themselves with legal matters because in this dispensation,<br />
unlike the one behind us and the final one ahead, God’s<br />
law has nothing to do with Christ’s gospel.<br />
This is a two-fold deliverance: from total defeat in history<br />
and from the responsibility to study God’s revealed law and<br />
develop its principles in practice. Of course, the price of this<br />
rejection of the Church’s victory in history and this rejection of<br />
responsibility is the open affirmation of the Church’s cultural<br />
irrelevance. This affirmation leads to a rejection of any work<br />
that might produce victory or extend Christians’ cultural responsibilities.<br />
It is not just that dispensationalists reject the Bible<br />
as a legitimate guide to social ethics in our dispensation; they<br />
reject the very legitimacy of studying social ethics. Why bother<br />
with social ethics? If three-quarters of the Bible is not a valid<br />
guide to ethics, then to become masters of social ethics, Christians<br />
must also become humanists: either natural-law humanists<br />
or some far worse variety. The Christian should ask himselfl<br />
Why work hard for a lifetime in order to become just one more<br />
ethical humanist? The answer is obvious.