12.07.2013 Views

Rapture Fever

by Gary North

by Gary North

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

206 RAPTURE FEVER<br />

believed what they have been told for the last two centuries.<br />

Except for postmillennialism, which is believed by very few<br />

Christians, the other systems of eschatological interpretation<br />

offer only historical despair. But the pretribulational system<br />

offers a glimmer of hope in the darkness of historical despair,<br />

namely, an escape from history the <strong>Rapture</strong>.<br />

“We’re under grace, not law.” So runs the theology of most<br />

Protestants. But pretribulational dispensationalists assert a<br />

radical judicial discontinuity with both the past and the future.<br />

Today’s Christians, they argue, have escaped the heavy moral<br />

burdens of law-enforcement in history, unlike Israel prior to<br />

the cross and also during the millennial era to come. Victmy in<br />

history is correctlj seen by dispensationalists as Christians’ ability to<br />

enforce Godk law, bringing sanctions in terms of it, including cim”l<br />

sanctions. But this ability supposedly has nothing to do with the<br />

Church during the Church Age. Christians therefore need not<br />

concern themselves with legal matters because in this dispensation,<br />

unlike the one behind us and the final one ahead, God’s<br />

law has nothing to do with Christ’s gospel.<br />

This is a two-fold deliverance: from total defeat in history<br />

and from the responsibility to study God’s revealed law and<br />

develop its principles in practice. Of course, the price of this<br />

rejection of the Church’s victory in history and this rejection of<br />

responsibility is the open affirmation of the Church’s cultural<br />

irrelevance. This affirmation leads to a rejection of any work<br />

that might produce victory or extend Christians’ cultural responsibilities.<br />

It is not just that dispensationalists reject the Bible<br />

as a legitimate guide to social ethics in our dispensation; they<br />

reject the very legitimacy of studying social ethics. Why bother<br />

with social ethics? If three-quarters of the Bible is not a valid<br />

guide to ethics, then to become masters of social ethics, Christians<br />

must also become humanists: either natural-law humanists<br />

or some far worse variety. The Christian should ask himselfl<br />

Why work hard for a lifetime in order to become just one more<br />

ethical humanist? The answer is obvious.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!