Rapture Fever
by Gary North by Gary North
The Strange Disappearance of Dtipensational Institutions 201 repeated. Debt is the lure. Debt is the killer. “I have faith that God will bless this ministry later if I make a leap of faith now - with other people’s money.” Jerry Falwell is a decent man. He just forgot the rule: “Owe no man any thing but to love one another” (Remans 13:8a). He was under grace, not biblical law, he thought. Scofield stties again! In 1982, I wrote an essay, “The Intellectual Schizophrenia of the New Christian Right.” It was published in Christianity and Civilization. There I predicted the break-up of the New Christian Right. I argued that its politically activist stance could not be defended by its dispensational theology. One by one, the leaders of that short-lived phenomenon have faded away. Those few who remain rarely talk about eschatology. (In Beverly LaHaye’s case, her husband talks about it; she doesn’t. Not with 400,000 on her activist mailing list!) Conclusion I will say it again: Di@ensationalism is dying. The leaders who write the paperback prophecy books won’t admit it, but it’s true. One by one, institutions that long maintained the old position have revised, restructured, and retreated from the intellectual battlefield. This doesn’t prove that theonomy is winning. It means that our most consistently antinomian, anti-victory, anti-activism opponents are retiring, in every sense. Sensational paperback books plus a Canadian tabloid newspaper filled with prophecies that never come true cannot preserve the old theology. Hype is not a substitute for scholarship. It is just a matter of time. We have plenty of it. Dispensationalism doesn’t. As those old travelogues used to end: “And so it’s time to say, ‘Sayonara, Scofield!’ “
CONCLUSION . . . ye are dull of hearing. For when for the time ~e ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat. For evay one that useth milk is unskilful in. the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil (Heb. 5:11-14). It is my contention that Christians today are in the same spiritual condition as the readers of the Epistle to the Hebrews in the author’s day. They have become theological milk-drinkers who are content with the ABC’s of faith. They are unskilled in the word of righteousness. They are out of shape judicially. There is a reason for this. They hate three-quarters of the Bible: the law and the prophets. Hating God’s law with all their heart, they also hate the thought of victory, which has been promised by God to those cultures that obey God’s revealed law (Deut. 28:1-14). Hating victory in history, they necessarily have come to regard themselves as principled losers in history. “Who is on the Lord’s Side?” So asks a popular Protestant evangelical hymn. The correct answer, as far as modern evangelicalism teaches in public, is this: htitotical losers. For over two centuries, Protestant evangelical have seen themselves as members of a culturally impotent Church and a religiously neutral civil order. They have had far greater faith in the civil order -
- Page 188 and 189: Revising Dtipensationaltim to Death
- Page 190 and 191: Revising Dispensationali.sm to Dea!
- Page 192 and 193: Revising Dispen.nationalism to Deat
- Page 194 and 195: Revising Dispensationaltim to Death
- Page 196 and 197: Revising Dis@nsationalism to Death
- Page 198 and 199: Revising D@ensationalkm to Death 16
- Page 200 and 201: 9 DISPENSATIONALISM VS. SIX-DAY CRE
- Page 202 and 203: Di.spensationalism vs. Six-Day Crea
- Page 204 and 205: Dispensationalism us. Six-Day Creat
- Page 206 and 207: Dispensationaltim vs. Six-Day Creat
- Page 208 and 209: Dispensationalism vs. Six-Day Creat
- Page 210 and 211: D@ensationalism vs. Sanctification
- Page 212 and 213: Dispensationalism vs. Sanctificatio
- Page 214 and 215: Dis$ensationalism vs. Sanctificatio
- Page 216 and 217: Dispensationali.sm vs. Sancttjicati
- Page 218 and 219: Theological Schizophrenia 181 again
- Page 220 and 221: Theological Schiwphrenia 183 1980.
- Page 222 and 223: Theological Schizophrenia 185 What
- Page 224 and 225: Theological Schizophrenia 187 nal,
- Page 226 and 227: When “Babylon” Fell, So Did Dis
- Page 228 and 229: When “Babylon” Fell, So Did Dis
- Page 230 and 231: When “Babylon” Fell, So Did Dis
- Page 232 and 233: 13 THE STRANGE DISAPPEARANCE OF DIS
- Page 234 and 235: The Strange Disappearance of Dispen
- Page 236 and 237: The Strange Disappearance of D&pens
- Page 240 and 241: Conclusion 203 supposedly based on
- Page 242 and 243: Conclusion 205 Fourth, because God
- Page 244 and 245: Conclusion 207 The dispensationalis
- Page 246 and 247: Conclusion 209 nobody believes in i
- Page 248 and 249: Conclusion 211 repeatedly that “p
- Page 250 and 251: Conclusion 213 original creed again
- Page 252 and 253: Conclusion 215 struction. Sort of.
- Page 254 and 255: Conclusion 217 nationalism, openly
- Page 256 and 257: Conclusion 219 to what you are doin
- Page 258 and 259: Conclusion 221 surely the situation
- Page 260 and 261: Bibliography 223 Works Defending Po
- Page 262 and 263: Bibliography 225 Eschatology. Tyler
- Page 264 and 265: Bibliograph~ 227 Vos, Geerhardus. R
- Page 266 and 267: Bibliography 229 thorough critical
- Page 268 and 269: Bibliography 231 Mauro, Philip. The
- Page 270 and 271: history and the U.S. Constitution.
- Page 272 and 273: 236 RAPTURE FEVER llO:lf 78-79 Prov
- Page 274 and 275: abortion, xxxii, XXXV, 13, 141, 160
- Page 276 and 277: 240 RAPTURE FEVER dispensationalism
- Page 278 and 279: 242 RAPTURE FEVER dispensationalism
- Page 280 and 281: 244 RAPTURE FEVER intellectual, xxx
- Page 282 and 283: 246 RAPTURE FEVER Solzhenitsyn, A.,
- Page 284 and 285: A THREE-YEAR STRATEGY FOR PASTORS I
- Page 286 and 287: ABOUT THE AUTHOR Gary North receive
The Strange Disappearance of Dtipensational Institutions 201<br />
repeated. Debt is the lure. Debt is the killer. “I have faith that<br />
God will bless this ministry later if I make a leap of faith now -<br />
with other people’s money.”<br />
Jerry Falwell is a decent man. He just forgot the rule: “Owe<br />
no man any thing but to love one another” (Remans 13:8a). He<br />
was under grace, not biblical law, he thought. Scofield stties<br />
again!<br />
In 1982, I wrote an essay, “The Intellectual Schizophrenia of<br />
the New Christian Right.” It was published in Christianity and<br />
Civilization. There I predicted the break-up of the New Christian<br />
Right. I argued that its politically activist stance could not<br />
be defended by its dispensational theology. One by one, the<br />
leaders of that short-lived phenomenon have faded away. Those<br />
few who remain rarely talk about eschatology. (In Beverly<br />
LaHaye’s case, her husband talks about it; she doesn’t. Not with<br />
400,000 on her activist mailing list!)<br />
Conclusion<br />
I will say it again: Di@ensationalism is dying. The leaders who<br />
write the paperback prophecy books won’t admit it, but it’s<br />
true. One by one, institutions that long maintained the old<br />
position have revised, restructured, and retreated from the<br />
intellectual battlefield.<br />
This doesn’t prove that theonomy is winning. It means that<br />
our most consistently antinomian, anti-victory, anti-activism<br />
opponents are retiring, in every sense. Sensational paperback<br />
books plus a Canadian tabloid newspaper filled with prophecies<br />
that never come true cannot preserve the old theology. Hype is<br />
not a substitute for scholarship.<br />
It is just a matter of time. We have plenty of it. Dispensationalism<br />
doesn’t. As those old travelogues used to end: “And so it’s<br />
time to say, ‘Sayonara, Scofield!’ “