Rapture Fever

by Gary North by Gary North

12.07.2013 Views

Dis$ensationalism vs. Sanctification 177 Ideas Have Consequences MacArthur tells us frankly what traditional dispensational theology’s rampant antinomianism has produced: churches filled with immorality One of the most mfllgnant by-products of the debacle in contemporary evangelism is a gospel that fails to confront individuals with the reality of their sin. Even the most conservative churches are teeming with people who, claiming to be born again, live like pagans. Contemporary Christians have been conditioned never to question anyone’s salvation. If a person declares he has trusted Christ as Savior, no one challenges his testimony, regardless of how inconsistent his life-style may be with God’s Word (p. 59). Who teaches such doctrines of “once saved, always saved, no matter what”? Col. Bob Thieme does. Yes, the man who had the world’s largest tape ministry in the early 1960’s. MacArthur cites Thieme’s book, Apes and Peacocks in Pursuit of Happiness (1973): “It is possible, even probable, that when a believer out of fellowship falls for certain types of philosophy if he is a logical thinker, will become an ‘unbelieving believer.’ Yet believers who become agnostics are still saved; they are still born again. You can even become an atheist; but once you accept Christ as savior, you cannot lose your salvation, even though you deny God” (l%ieme, p. 23; MacArthur, pp. 97-98). So much for I John 2:19: “They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.” Imputation and Confession MacArthur did his best to refute Lane Hodges and others who proclaim that people are saved even though they refuse to proclaim Jesus as Lord. Proclaiming Jesus as savior is sufficient

1’78 RAPTURE FEVER to get them into heaven. MacArthur denies this. He says that people must accept Jesus as Lord or else their sins will destroy the validity of their verbal confession. Neither side in this debate understands the biblical doctrine of imputation. God imputes Christ’s perfection to each person at the time of his or her conversion. That is, God declares judicially that the person is not guilty in His court because of the completed work of Jesus Christ in His substitutionary death. What MaArthur and his opponents do not discuss is the content of this judicial imputation. It is total. That is, the total perfection of Christ’s ministry becomes the inheritance of the redeemed believer. This means that Christ’s public confession of His own work is imputed to the believer. Christ is a legal representative, just as Adam was. His perfect confession becomes each believer’s confession before God. It does not matter that the believer confesses imperfectly in history. He mayor may not ever recognize that Jesus is His sovereign Lord, but Lordship salvation is inescapable judicially. Jesus Christ makes the sinner’s confession for him. This is a neglected aspect of the biblical doctrine of representation, commonly called the substitutionary atonement. The definitive sanctification - Christ’s moral perfection - which the believer received through imputation at the time of his conversion cannot stay still. History is inescapable. We move from spiritual infancy to spiritual maturity. We work out the salvation that God extends to us. Thus, definitive sanctification leads to progressive sanctification in history. Progressive sanctification culminates in final sanctification on the day of final judgment. So, as Christians mature, their confessions are supposed to become more precise, and their behavior is more and more to reflect these ever-improving personal confessions. Thus, Hodges is correct: men do not need to confess Jesus as Lord in order to be saved. Thus, MacArthur is correct: if there is no evidence of progressive sanctification in the confessing church member’s life, he is not saved, i.e., he was not the recipient of definitive sanctification. “Once saved, always saved is

1’78 RAPTURE FEVER<br />

to get them into heaven. MacArthur denies this. He says that<br />

people must accept Jesus as Lord or else their sins will destroy<br />

the validity of their verbal confession.<br />

Neither side in this debate understands the biblical doctrine<br />

of imputation. God imputes Christ’s perfection to each person<br />

at the time of his or her conversion. That is, God declares<br />

judicially that the person is not guilty in His court because of<br />

the completed work of Jesus Christ in His substitutionary<br />

death. What MaArthur and his opponents do not discuss is the<br />

content of this judicial imputation. It is total. That is, the total<br />

perfection of Christ’s ministry becomes the inheritance of the<br />

redeemed believer. This means that Christ’s public confession of His<br />

own work is imputed to the believer. Christ is a legal representative,<br />

just as Adam was. His perfect confession becomes each believer’s<br />

confession before God. It does not matter that the believer<br />

confesses imperfectly in history. He mayor may not ever<br />

recognize that Jesus is His sovereign Lord, but Lordship salvation<br />

is inescapable judicially. Jesus Christ makes the sinner’s confession<br />

for him. This is a neglected aspect of the biblical doctrine of<br />

representation, commonly called the substitutionary atonement.<br />

The definitive sanctification - Christ’s moral perfection -<br />

which the believer received through imputation at the time of<br />

his conversion cannot stay still. History is inescapable. We move<br />

from spiritual infancy to spiritual maturity. We work out the<br />

salvation that God extends to us. Thus, definitive sanctification<br />

leads to progressive sanctification in history. Progressive sanctification<br />

culminates in final sanctification on the day of final<br />

judgment. So, as Christians mature, their confessions are supposed<br />

to become more precise, and their behavior is more and<br />

more to reflect these ever-improving personal confessions.<br />

Thus, Hodges is correct: men do not need to confess Jesus as<br />

Lord in order to be saved. Thus, MacArthur is correct: if there<br />

is no evidence of progressive sanctification in the confessing<br />

church member’s life, he is not saved, i.e., he was not the recipient<br />

of definitive sanctification. “Once saved, always saved is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!