12.07.2013 Views

Rapture Fever

by Gary North

by Gary North

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Revising D@ensationalkm to Death 161<br />

dispensational system. Moral revulsion against the silence of the<br />

leaders on the part of laymen who are willing to take risks<br />

continues to erode their confidence in dispensational theology<br />

and the academic leaders produced by it. Dispensationalist<br />

professors today can neither defend their theological system<br />

nor defend the right to life. Dis#ensationali.sm today is visibly bankrupt;<br />

theologically, it always has been, but this fact was not<br />

publicly visible until after the legalization of abortion. This<br />

moral defection by seminary faculties is an extension of their<br />

intellectual defection after the publication of Allis’ Prophecy and<br />

the Church. One by one, these seminaries are going bankrupt.<br />

Leadership is slipping away from them, as well it should.<br />

Conclusion<br />

I will say it once again, just to be sure that everyone understands:<br />

Dominion Theology: Blessing or Curse? (1988) was a public<br />

admission of the death of dispensationalism. So is the failure of<br />

any dispensationalist scholar to respond to House Divided. House<br />

and Ice provided the first full-scale statement of the dispensational<br />

position - by way of refuting theonomy - that we have<br />

seen since Ryrie’s brief and ineffective 1965 book, Dispen.sationalism<br />

Today. That book failed to answer the critics of dispensationalism.<br />

Dominion Theology: Blessing or Curse? is far worse, from<br />

the point of view of Scofieldism: it raised even more explosive<br />

questions, yet pretended to have answers to theonomy. House<br />

Divided disproved this claim within months. No one has challenged<br />

House Divided, least of all ex-professor House.<br />

I will say it once again: the theological debate is over. I said this<br />

in 1989, and I am saying it again. Christian Reconstructionism<br />

has not yet won the debate with every known theological critic<br />

(although we are working on it), but it has won the debate with<br />

the dispensationalists. By engaging dispensationalism directly,<br />

Dr. Bahnsen and Dr. Gentry brought up to date the brilliant<br />

and deliberately long-ignored work of O. T. Allis. Allis inflicted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!