Rapture Fever
by Gary North by Gary North
House of Seven Garbles 139 This shell game has been going on at Dallas for decades. “Keep your eye on the pre-trib, premillennial pea, my friends. See how it goes here, under this 1830 pretribulation Rapture shell. Now, with just a few deft shuffles . . . presto: we now find it under the historic premillennial shell of the early Church! Thus, we can see that C. I. Scofield was a defender of eschatological orthodoxy. Now, take this postmillennial pea. We place it under the seventeenth-century Puritan shell.’ A few deft shuffles . . . presto: we now find it under Daniel Whitby’s eighteenth-century unitarian shell. Thus, we can see that postmillennialism has very questionable ancestry!” Ice and House continue to push around these mostly empty shells. Bad habits picked up in one’s youth are difficult to break. Garble #4: An Inner Kingdom Only Matthew 13 is filled with parables about God’s kingdom in history. Several proclaim the Church’s continuity in histo~, also called the leaven jminci~le (Matt. 13:33-34): the influence of the gospel continues to transform history without a break until the final judgment. These parables are the most difficult passages in the Bible for premillennialists. The authors cite Grace Seminary’s A.lva J. McClain, who referred to them as “these difficult parables” (p. 226). They are not difficult for postmillennialists! On the contrary they are foundational. To escape the Reconstructionists’ accusation that dispensationalism is socially paralyzing, they say: “Dispensationalists agree that it is wrong to limit God to only the spiritual or inner realm. This is why we so strongly believe in a literal kingdom of Christ, which will encompass his rule over every area of life” (p. 247, note 65). They have now given the game away. The external kingdom is supposedly exclusively millennial, i.e., future. They say that insofar as we are speaking of the so-called Church Age - the here and now - God has limited His kingdom to the inner or spiritual realm. This is what author Dave Hunt says repeatedly in his Seduction books.
140 RAPTURE FEVER They then quote favorably Samuel J. Andrews, whose words, if taken literally (the “Dallas hermeneutic”), set forth the foundation for the rule o~the tyrannical Saints – something the authors accuse us Reconstructionists of promoting. We have seen the results of this sort of premillennialism in the revolutionary “Christian” communist movements of the late Middle Ages.ll This is what can happen when you combine apocalyptic premillennialism and a theological hostility to revealed biblical law: It is as its Head that He rules over [the Church], not as its Kin% for this latter title is never used of this relation. Nor is His rule over His Church legal and external, like that of an earthly king. . . . The relation between Him, the Head, and the Church, His Body, is a living one, such as nowhere else exists, or can exis~ His will is the law, not merely of its action, but of its life. . . . He rules in the Church through the law of common life. . . (p. 235). Spoken like a true Brother of the Free Spirit! Get out your shotguns and hide your wives and daughters: premillennialist are on the march again. Fortunately, this book tells dispensationalists not to march, but to stand dead still: “. . . God has told us to take up a defensive posture against the enemy . . . stand and resist. . . the sword is for a counterattack . . . stand” (p. 156). This book is a 460-page tract to stand jzzt~orjesus. It is a theological defense of John Milton’s line, “They also serve who only stand and wait.” Milton had an excuse, however. He was totally blind. Then again, now that I think about it. . . . Garble #5: Neither Biblical Law Nor Natural Law The non-Reconstructionii’t Christian, we are told, “is not under the law as a rule of life; rather we are under the law of Christ” (p. 184). This they call Wisdom. Wisdom “does not 11. Norman Cohn, The Pursuit of the A4illerzrziun (2nd cd.; New York: Harper Torchbook, 1961); and the early modern era: Igor Shafarevich, The Socialist Pherwnzenon (New York Harper & Row, [1975] 1980), ch. 2.
- Page 126 and 127: Dispensationaltim Removes Eatihij H
- Page 128 and 129: 5 A COMMITMENT TO CULTURAL IRRELEVA
- Page 130 and 131: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 132 and 133: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 134 and 135: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 136 and 137: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 138 and 139: A Commitment to Cultural Imelevance
- Page 140 and 141: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 142 and 143: A Commitment to Cultural Iwelevance
- Page 144 and 145: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 146 and 147: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 148 and 149: A Ghetto Eschatology 111 clom is ac
- Page 150 and 151: A Ghetto Eschatologj 113 testified
- Page 152 and 153: A Ghetto Eschatology 115 cause of m
- Page 154 and 155: A Ghetto Eschatology 11’7 actions
- Page 156 and 157: A Ghetto Eschatology 119 When Chris
- Page 158 and 159: A Ghetto Eschatology 121 preach God
- Page 160 and 161: A Ghetto Eschatology 123 antiquaria
- Page 162 and 163: A Ghetto Eschatolog~ 125 an acciden
- Page 164 and 165: A Ghtto Eschutology 127 all, the si
- Page 166 and 167: 7 HOUSE OF SEVEN GARBLES [In respon
- Page 168 and 169: House of Seven Garbles 131 A Fig Tr
- Page 170 and 171: House of Seven Garbles 133 And let
- Page 172 and 173: House of Seven Garbles 135 in point
- Page 174 and 175: House of Seven Garbles 137 As I sai
- Page 178 and 179: House of Seven Garbles 141 legislat
- Page 180 and 181: House of Seven Garbles 143 the rain
- Page 182 and 183: 8 REVISING DISPENSATIONALISM TO DEA
- Page 184 and 185: Revising Dhpensationalism to Death
- Page 186 and 187: Reuising Disfiensationalism to Deat
- Page 188 and 189: Revising Dtipensationaltim to Death
- Page 190 and 191: Revising Dispensationali.sm to Dea!
- Page 192 and 193: Revising Dispen.nationalism to Deat
- Page 194 and 195: Revising Dispensationaltim to Death
- Page 196 and 197: Revising Dis@nsationalism to Death
- Page 198 and 199: Revising D@ensationalkm to Death 16
- Page 200 and 201: 9 DISPENSATIONALISM VS. SIX-DAY CRE
- Page 202 and 203: Di.spensationalism vs. Six-Day Crea
- Page 204 and 205: Dispensationalism us. Six-Day Creat
- Page 206 and 207: Dispensationaltim vs. Six-Day Creat
- Page 208 and 209: Dispensationalism vs. Six-Day Creat
- Page 210 and 211: D@ensationalism vs. Sanctification
- Page 212 and 213: Dispensationalism vs. Sanctificatio
- Page 214 and 215: Dis$ensationalism vs. Sanctificatio
- Page 216 and 217: Dispensationali.sm vs. Sancttjicati
- Page 218 and 219: Theological Schizophrenia 181 again
- Page 220 and 221: Theological Schiwphrenia 183 1980.
- Page 222 and 223: Theological Schizophrenia 185 What
- Page 224 and 225: Theological Schizophrenia 187 nal,
House of Seven Garbles 139<br />
This shell game has been going on at Dallas for decades.<br />
“Keep your eye on the pre-trib, premillennial pea, my friends.<br />
See how it goes here, under this 1830 pretribulation <strong>Rapture</strong><br />
shell. Now, with just a few deft shuffles . . . presto: we now find<br />
it under the historic premillennial shell of the early Church!<br />
Thus, we can see that C. I. Scofield was a defender of eschatological<br />
orthodoxy. Now, take this postmillennial pea. We place<br />
it under the seventeenth-century Puritan shell.’ A few deft<br />
shuffles . . . presto: we now find it under Daniel Whitby’s eighteenth-century<br />
unitarian shell. Thus, we can see that postmillennialism<br />
has very questionable ancestry!” Ice and House<br />
continue to push around these mostly empty shells. Bad habits<br />
picked up in one’s youth are difficult to break.<br />
Garble #4: An Inner Kingdom Only<br />
Matthew 13 is filled with parables about God’s kingdom in<br />
history. Several proclaim the Church’s continuity in histo~, also<br />
called the leaven jminci~le (Matt. 13:33-34): the influence of the<br />
gospel continues to transform history without a break until the<br />
final judgment. These parables are the most difficult passages<br />
in the Bible for premillennialists. The authors cite Grace Seminary’s<br />
A.lva J. McClain, who referred to them as “these difficult<br />
parables” (p. 226). They are not difficult for postmillennialists!<br />
On the contrary they are foundational.<br />
To escape the Reconstructionists’ accusation that dispensationalism<br />
is socially paralyzing, they say: “Dispensationalists<br />
agree that it is wrong to limit God to only the spiritual or inner<br />
realm. This is why we so strongly believe in a literal kingdom of<br />
Christ, which will encompass his rule over every area of life” (p.<br />
247, note 65). They have now given the game away. The external<br />
kingdom is supposedly exclusively millennial, i.e., future. They say<br />
that insofar as we are speaking of the so-called Church Age -<br />
the here and now - God has limited His kingdom to the inner<br />
or spiritual realm. This is what author Dave Hunt says repeatedly<br />
in his Seduction books.