Rapture Fever
by Gary North by Gary North
A Ghetto Eschatologj 113 testified publicly to the Jews’ position of political subordination to Rome. To deny this fact in public would have constituted an act of rebellion. The Pharisees, who served as civil agents of the Roman state, knew this all too well. They kept prudently silent. By speaking of things belonging to Caesar, Jesus was affn-ming the existence of legitimate political power in history. God delegates political power to specific men to manage as stewards, just as He delegates ownership of property to specific individuals and families. As the ultimate sovereign Owner, God is at the top of a hierarchy. Power is delegated to men. It is never held autonomously by men. By telling men to render to Caesar what belonged to Caesar, Jesus was identifying Caesar as a ruler under God: the recipient of delegated power. Jesus was denying the supposed right of Caesar to command worship as a god. Jesus’ answer drove home the economic point: ownershi# and authority are never autonomous. They are always delegated by God. This hierarchical pattern of ownership is basic to economics, politics, and all government. A sovereign God delegates limited power to His subordinates. The existence of a hierarchy of authority therefore leads to the question that constitutions and courts must answer: Where are the God-established covenantal boundaries of power separating State, Church, family, and individuals? More to the point, where are we given authoritative answers to these questions regarding judicial boundaries, in nature or in the Bible? This is what the pietists prefer not to discuss. This question raises the issue of the biblical legitimacy of natural law theory, the implicit alternative system to biblical law in Christian political theory. The obvious answer - obvious to everyone except millions upon millions of humanist-educated Christians - is that the Bible is the place where we must begin our search for these boundaries. But to say this is to reject the judicial foundations of natural law theory and its corollary, political pluralism. American pietists resent any such challenge. They
114 RAPTURE FEVER much prefer to abandon at least three-fourths of the Bible, and so they have. Then what is to prevent Caesar from demanding threefourths of whatever Christians own or produce? Mere tradition? The threat of a tax revolt? Well, then, Caesar will remain content - this year - to take only 40’%0 of his servants’ income: twice what Pharaoh extracted from the Egyptians (Gen. 47:26), which was twice what Samuel identified as political tyranny (I Sam. 8:15, 17). Caesar knows that his pietistic Christian servants will not quote the Old Testament at him. They have abandoned it. They have also abandoned earthly hope. They have devised eschatologies of inevitable failure - ghetto eschatologies - that match their ghetto political theory. A Letter from the Fundamentalist Ghetto In my ICE cover letter of January 1992, I began with this statement: The decline of Christian scholarship in this century has been disgraceful. What began as an erosion of scholarship in the late sixteenth century has become a collapse today. Things are so bad that in the field of history the humanists are generally producing better works of scholarship on Christianity’s role in history than Christians are. I went on to report on the availability of a CD-ROM version of Migne’s Latin Church Fathers, which I recommended for purchase by every Christian college (not, it needs to be said, every Christian individual). Then I made a prediction: “I doubt that a dozen will buy it, even if they all hear about it. So abysmal is the level of Christian education today that there are no students and few faculty members who can read Latin well, let alone understand the theology of the Church fathers and assess its development through the centuries.” Why did I say this? Be-
- Page 100 and 101: Pessimism Produces Paralysis 63 “
- Page 102 and 103: Pessimism Produces Paralysis 65 the
- Page 104 and 105: Pessimism Produces Paral’sis 67
- Page 106 and 107: Pessimism Produces Paralysis 69 in
- Page 108 and 109: Pessimism Produces Paral@s 71 (with
- Page 110 and 111: Pessimism Produces Paralysis 73 is
- Page 112 and 113: Pessimism Produces Paralysis 75 Con
- Page 114 and 115: Dis@nsationalism Removes Earthly Ho
- Page 116 and 117: Dispensationalism Removes Earthly H
- Page 118 and 119: Dispensationalism Removes Earthly H
- Page 120 and 121: D@ensationahsm Removes Earthly Hope
- Page 122 and 123: Dtifensationaltim Removes Earthly H
- Page 124 and 125: Dis~ensationali.sm Removes Earthly
- Page 126 and 127: Dispensationaltim Removes Eatihij H
- Page 128 and 129: 5 A COMMITMENT TO CULTURAL IRRELEVA
- Page 130 and 131: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 132 and 133: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 134 and 135: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 136 and 137: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 138 and 139: A Commitment to Cultural Imelevance
- Page 140 and 141: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 142 and 143: A Commitment to Cultural Iwelevance
- Page 144 and 145: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 146 and 147: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 148 and 149: A Ghetto Eschatology 111 clom is ac
- Page 152 and 153: A Ghetto Eschatology 115 cause of m
- Page 154 and 155: A Ghetto Eschatology 11’7 actions
- Page 156 and 157: A Ghetto Eschatology 119 When Chris
- Page 158 and 159: A Ghetto Eschatology 121 preach God
- Page 160 and 161: A Ghetto Eschatology 123 antiquaria
- Page 162 and 163: A Ghetto Eschatolog~ 125 an acciden
- Page 164 and 165: A Ghtto Eschutology 127 all, the si
- Page 166 and 167: 7 HOUSE OF SEVEN GARBLES [In respon
- Page 168 and 169: House of Seven Garbles 131 A Fig Tr
- Page 170 and 171: House of Seven Garbles 133 And let
- Page 172 and 173: House of Seven Garbles 135 in point
- Page 174 and 175: House of Seven Garbles 137 As I sai
- Page 176 and 177: House of Seven Garbles 139 This she
- Page 178 and 179: House of Seven Garbles 141 legislat
- Page 180 and 181: House of Seven Garbles 143 the rain
- Page 182 and 183: 8 REVISING DISPENSATIONALISM TO DEA
- Page 184 and 185: Revising Dhpensationalism to Death
- Page 186 and 187: Reuising Disfiensationalism to Deat
- Page 188 and 189: Revising Dtipensationaltim to Death
- Page 190 and 191: Revising Dispensationali.sm to Dea!
- Page 192 and 193: Revising Dispen.nationalism to Deat
- Page 194 and 195: Revising Dispensationaltim to Death
- Page 196 and 197: Revising Dis@nsationalism to Death
- Page 198 and 199: Revising D@ensationalkm to Death 16
114 RAPTURE FEVER<br />
much prefer to abandon at least three-fourths of the Bible, and<br />
so they have.<br />
Then what is to prevent Caesar from demanding threefourths<br />
of whatever Christians own or produce? Mere tradition?<br />
The threat of a tax revolt? Well, then, Caesar will remain content<br />
- this year - to take only 40’%0 of his servants’ income: twice<br />
what Pharaoh extracted from the Egyptians (Gen. 47:26), which<br />
was twice what Samuel identified as political tyranny (I Sam.<br />
8:15, 17). Caesar knows that his pietistic Christian servants will<br />
not quote the Old Testament at him. They have abandoned it.<br />
They have also abandoned earthly hope. They have devised<br />
eschatologies of inevitable failure - ghetto eschatologies - that<br />
match their ghetto political theory.<br />
A Letter from the Fundamentalist Ghetto<br />
In my ICE cover letter of January 1992, I began with this<br />
statement:<br />
The decline of Christian scholarship in this century has been<br />
disgraceful. What began as an erosion of scholarship in the late<br />
sixteenth century has become a collapse today. Things are so bad<br />
that in the field of history the humanists are generally producing<br />
better works of scholarship on Christianity’s role in history than<br />
Christians are.<br />
I went on to report on the availability of a CD-ROM version of<br />
Migne’s Latin Church Fathers, which I recommended for purchase<br />
by every Christian college (not, it needs to be said, every<br />
Christian individual). Then I made a prediction: “I doubt that<br />
a dozen will buy it, even if they all hear about it. So abysmal is<br />
the level of Christian education today that there are no students<br />
and few faculty members who can read Latin well, let alone<br />
understand the theology of the Church fathers and assess its<br />
development through the centuries.” Why did I say this? Be-