Rapture Fever

by Gary North by Gary North

12.07.2013 Views

A Commitment to Cultural Imelevance 101 Because this attitude toward social change has prevailed within American fundamentalism since at least 1925, those who attempt to dwell only in the “lower storey” – non-Christians - have had few reasons to take fundamentalism very seriously. American Christians have been in self-conscious cultural retreat from historic reality and cultural responsibility for most of the twentieth century. 13 Meanwhile, as non-Christians have become steadily more consistent with their own worldview, they have begun to recognize more clearly who their enemies really are: Christians who proclaim the God of the Bible, i.e., the God of final judgment. Thus, we are now seeing an escalation of the inherent, inevitable conflict between covenant-keepers and covenant-breakers in the United States. The Great Escape Hatch Modern premillennial fundamentalism proclaims that there is only one biblical solution to this escalating conflict: the Rapture. The Rapture of the saints is said to come in history, not at the end of history, as postmillennialist and amillennialists insist. The Rapture serves them psychologically as the hopedfor Great Escape Hatch. This is the “hope of historical hopes” for Bible-believing fundamentalists, as Dave Hunt insists in his 1988 book, Whatever Happened to Heaven? The theological world of fundamentalism is a two-storey world, and those who lived psychologically in that upper storey were content, up until about 1975, to let the humanists run things in the lower storey. But the Rapture has been delayed again and again, and those who have been running things “downstairs” are getting pushy in their monopolistic control over education, politics, the media, and just about everything else. Fundamentalists are at long last getting sick and tired of New World Order. 13. Douglas W. Frank, Less Than Conqw-nms: How Euangelicals Entered the Twentieth Centusy (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1986).

102 RAPTURE FEVER being pushed around. They want to have a greater voice in running affairs the lower storey. But the older version of fundamentalism teaches that this is a false hope, both morally and prophetically while the secular humanists still argue that the Christians have no authority no moral right, to exercise such authority. After all, we are told by both fimdamentalists and secular humanists, this is a pluralist nation. (Pluralism means that Christians have no legal rights except to pay taxes to institutions controlled by humanists.) So, we find that fundamentalism is splitting apart psychologically. The “lower storey” activists are tired of listening to the escapism of the “upper storey” pietists. As the activists grow increasingly impatient with the arguments of the passivists, they begin to abandon the theology that undergirds passivism: original Scofieldism. Fundamentalism in general now has only two legitimate hopes: the imminent Great Escape of the Rapture or the long-term overturning of the older two-storey fundamentalist theology. Either Scofieldism’s promise must come true, and very soon, or else it will be abandoned. What about the former hope, i.e., the Rapture? It is fading fast among Christian activists. Dispensationalists have been repeatedly frustrated by the public announcement of, and subsequent delay of, the Rapture. A lot of them have now begun to lose interest in that much-abused doctrine. For at least a decade, we have not heard sermons by television evangelists about the imminent Rapture. Since 1979, the dispensationalist dam has begun to leak. The pent-up lake of frustrated Christian social concern and social relevance is now pouring through holes in the dam. When it finally breaks, as hole-ridden dams must, the world of dispensationalism will be swept away. The Death of Dispensational Theology If dispensational theology were still strong and healthy, it might be able to delay the looming transformation of the dispensational movement. But it is not healthy. Theologically

A Commitment to Cultural Imelevance 101<br />

Because this attitude toward social change has prevailed<br />

within American fundamentalism since at least 1925, those who<br />

attempt to dwell only in the “lower storey” – non-Christians -<br />

have had few reasons to take fundamentalism very seriously.<br />

American Christians have been in self-conscious cultural retreat<br />

from historic reality and cultural responsibility for most of the<br />

twentieth century. 13 Meanwhile, as non-Christians have become<br />

steadily more consistent with their own worldview, they<br />

have begun to recognize more clearly who their enemies really<br />

are: Christians who proclaim the God of the Bible, i.e., the God<br />

of final judgment. Thus, we are now seeing an escalation of the<br />

inherent, inevitable conflict between covenant-keepers and<br />

covenant-breakers in the United States.<br />

The Great Escape Hatch<br />

Modern premillennial fundamentalism proclaims that there<br />

is only one biblical solution to this escalating conflict: the <strong>Rapture</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Rapture</strong> of the saints is said to come in history, not at<br />

the end of history, as postmillennialist and amillennialists<br />

insist. The <strong>Rapture</strong> serves them psychologically as the hopedfor<br />

Great Escape Hatch. This is the “hope of historical hopes”<br />

for Bible-believing fundamentalists, as Dave Hunt insists in his<br />

1988 book, Whatever Happened to Heaven?<br />

The theological world of fundamentalism is a two-storey<br />

world, and those who lived psychologically in that upper storey<br />

were content, up until about 1975, to let the humanists run<br />

things in the lower storey. But the <strong>Rapture</strong> has been delayed<br />

again and again, and those who have been running things<br />

“downstairs” are getting pushy in their monopolistic control<br />

over education, politics, the media, and just about everything<br />

else. Fundamentalists are at long last getting sick and tired of<br />

New World Order.<br />

13. Douglas W. Frank, Less Than Conqw-nms: How Euangelicals Entered the Twentieth<br />

Centusy (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1986).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!