Rapture Fever
by Gary North by Gary North
Pessimism Produces Paral’sis 67 “honest government.” Without specifics, this is meaningless rhetoric. It is the theology of the rescue mission: sober them up, and then send them to Church until they die or Jesus comes again. This is the “Christian as a nice neighbor” version of what should be “salt and light” theology: “Save individuals, but not societies.” We return to Christianity Today (Feb. 6, 1987): Kant.zer: Are we saying here that the Christian community, whether premil, postmil, or amil, must work both with individuals as well as seek to improve the structures of society? In other words, is there nothing within the millennial views that would prevent a believer from trying to improve society? Walvoord: Well, the Bible says explicitly to do good to all men, especially those of fiiith. In other words, the Bible does give us broad commands to do good to the general public (p. 6-I). Broad commands are worthless without specifics. A call to “do good” ti ethically meaningless without Bible-based standards of good. A Communist or a New Age evolutionist could agree with Walvoord’s statement, since it contains no specifics. In response, Prof. John J. Davis of Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary a postmillennialist, replied: But generally speaking, the premillennialist is more oriented toward helping those who have been hurt by the system than by addressing the systematic evil, while the postmillennialkt believes the system can be sanctified. That’s the basic dfierence with regard to our relationship to society (pp. 6-I, 7-I). The Ultimate Form of Pessimism When dispensationalists are called pessimists by postmillennialist - as we postmillennialist unquestionably do call them - they react negatively. This is evidence of my contention that emnyone recognizes the inhibiting efects of pessimism. People do not
68 RAPTURE FEVER like being called pessimists. Walvoord is no exception. But his defense is most revealing: Walvoord: Well, I personally object to the idea that premillennialism is pessimistic. We are simply realistic in believing that man cannot change the world. Only God can (p. 1 l-I). “Man cannot change the world.” What does this mean? That man is a robot? That God does everything, for good and evil? Walvoord obviously does not mean this. So, exactly what does he mean? That men collectively can do evil but not good? Then what effect does the gospel have in history? If he does not want to make this preposterous conclusion, then he must mean that men acting apart from God’s will and God’s law cannot improve the world, long-term. If God is willing to put up with the victory of evil, then there is nothing we Christians can do about it except try to get out of the way of victorious sinners if we possibly can, while handing out gospel tracts on street corners and running rescue missions. The question is: IS God really willing to put up with the triumph of sinners over His Church in history? Yes, say premillennialists and amillennialists. No, say postmillennialists. This is the heart of the two-way argument. What Walvoord is im~~ing but not saying is that the postmillennialist’ doctrine of the historical power of regeneration, the historical power of the Holy Spirit, the historical power of biblical law, and the continuing validity of God’s dominion covenant with man (Gen. 1:26-28) is theologically erroneous, and perhaps even borderline heretical. But this, of course, is precisely the reason we postmillennialists refer to premillennialist as pessimistic. They implicitly hold the reverse doctrinal viewpoints: the historical Zack. of power of regeneration, the historical lack of power of the Holy Spirit, the historical lack of power of biblical law, and the present suspension of God’s dominion covenant with man. (Carl McIntyre’s premillennial Bible Presbyterian Church
- Page 54 and 55: Introdz@ion 17 Christian Reconstruc
- Page 56 and 57: 1 ENDLESS UNFULFILLED PROPHECIES PR
- Page 58 and 59: Endless UnfuljWed Prophecies Produc
- Page 60 and 61: Endless Unfulfilled Prophecies Prod
- Page 62 and 63: Endless Unfulfilled Prophecies Prod
- Page 64 and 65: Endless UnfuljWed Prophecies Produc
- Page 66 and 67: Endless Unfulfilled Prophecies Prod
- Page 68 and 69: Endless Unfu@lled Prophecies Produc
- Page 70 and 71: Endless Unfulfilled Prophecies Prod
- Page 72 and 73: Endless Unfulfilled Prophecies Prod
- Page 74 and 75: Endless Unfulfilled Prophecies Prod
- Page 76 and 77: Endless Unfulfilled Prophecies Prod
- Page 78 and 79: Fear of Men Produces Paralysis 41 b
- Page 80 and 81: Fear of Men Produces Paralysis 43 t
- Page 82 and 83: Fear of Men Produces Paralysis 45 t
- Page 84 and 85: Fear of Men Produces Paralysis 47 b
- Page 86 and 87: Fear of Men Produces Paralysis 49 h
- Page 88 and 89: Fear of Men Produces Paralysis 51 e
- Page 90 and 91: Fear of Men Produces Paralysis 53 m
- Page 92 and 93: Fear of Men Produces Paralysis 55 W
- Page 94 and 95: Fear of Men Produces Paralysis 57 e
- Page 96 and 97: Fear of Men Produces Para@s 59 both
- Page 98 and 99: 3 PESSIMISM PRODUCES PARALYSIS And
- Page 100 and 101: Pessimism Produces Paralysis 63 “
- Page 102 and 103: Pessimism Produces Paralysis 65 the
- Page 106 and 107: Pessimism Produces Paralysis 69 in
- Page 108 and 109: Pessimism Produces Paral@s 71 (with
- Page 110 and 111: Pessimism Produces Paralysis 73 is
- Page 112 and 113: Pessimism Produces Paralysis 75 Con
- Page 114 and 115: Dis@nsationalism Removes Earthly Ho
- Page 116 and 117: Dispensationalism Removes Earthly H
- Page 118 and 119: Dispensationalism Removes Earthly H
- Page 120 and 121: D@ensationahsm Removes Earthly Hope
- Page 122 and 123: Dtifensationaltim Removes Earthly H
- Page 124 and 125: Dis~ensationali.sm Removes Earthly
- Page 126 and 127: Dispensationaltim Removes Eatihij H
- Page 128 and 129: 5 A COMMITMENT TO CULTURAL IRRELEVA
- Page 130 and 131: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 132 and 133: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 134 and 135: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 136 and 137: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 138 and 139: A Commitment to Cultural Imelevance
- Page 140 and 141: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 142 and 143: A Commitment to Cultural Iwelevance
- Page 144 and 145: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 146 and 147: A Commitment to Cultural Irrelevanc
- Page 148 and 149: A Ghetto Eschatology 111 clom is ac
- Page 150 and 151: A Ghetto Eschatologj 113 testified
- Page 152 and 153: A Ghetto Eschatology 115 cause of m
Pessimism Produces Paral’sis 67<br />
“honest government.” Without specifics, this is meaningless<br />
rhetoric. It is the theology of the rescue mission: sober them<br />
up, and then send them to Church until they die or Jesus<br />
comes again. This is the “Christian as a nice neighbor” version<br />
of what should be “salt and light” theology: “Save individuals,<br />
but not societies.” We return to Christianity Today (Feb. 6, 1987):<br />
Kant.zer: Are we saying here that the Christian community,<br />
whether premil, postmil, or amil, must work both with individuals<br />
as well as seek to improve the structures of society? In<br />
other words, is there nothing within the millennial views that<br />
would prevent a believer from trying to improve society?<br />
Walvoord: Well, the Bible says explicitly to do good to all men,<br />
especially those of fiiith. In other words, the Bible does give us<br />
broad commands to do good to the general public (p. 6-I).<br />
Broad commands are worthless without specifics. A call to “do<br />
good” ti ethically meaningless without Bible-based standards of good. A<br />
Communist or a New Age evolutionist could agree with Walvoord’s<br />
statement, since it contains no specifics. In response,<br />
Prof. John J. Davis of Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary<br />
a postmillennialist, replied:<br />
But generally speaking, the premillennialist is more oriented<br />
toward helping those who have been hurt by the system than by<br />
addressing the systematic evil, while the postmillennialkt believes<br />
the system can be sanctified. That’s the basic dfierence with<br />
regard to our relationship to society (pp. 6-I, 7-I).<br />
The Ultimate Form of Pessimism<br />
When dispensationalists are called pessimists by postmillennialist<br />
- as we postmillennialist unquestionably do call them -<br />
they react negatively. This is evidence of my contention that<br />
emnyone recognizes the inhibiting efects of pessimism. People do not