12.07.2013 Views

EFS12- Book of abstracts - Contact

EFS12- Book of abstracts - Contact

EFS12- Book of abstracts - Contact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SESSION 3: PATHOGENESIS – EPIDEMIOLOGY AND POPULATION<br />

GENETICS<br />

Fusarium graminearum: Species or Clade?<br />

J. F. Leslie¹, R. L. Bowden²<br />

¹Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Pathology, Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University,<br />

Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA; ²Plant Science and Entomology Research Unit, USDA-ARS,<br />

Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.<br />

E-mail: jfl@ksu.edu<br />

Fusarium graminearum is a common cause <strong>of</strong> disease and mycotoxin<br />

contamination <strong>of</strong> grains such as maize, wheat, barley and rice. Within F.<br />

graminearum there are a number <strong>of</strong> phylogenetic lineages that some researchers<br />

recognize as distinct phylogenetic species. This hypothesis brings with it the<br />

expectation <strong>of</strong> other significant differences between the lineages. Yet, there is no<br />

significant difference in the quantitative ability <strong>of</strong> the strains from any <strong>of</strong> the tested<br />

lineages to form perithecia or ascospores when crossed with female-fertile tester<br />

strains that were designed for making controlled crosses. Physical and<br />

recombinational maps <strong>of</strong> F. graminearum are co-linear and similar for members <strong>of</strong><br />

at least the tested phylogenetic lineages, and there is no evidence for large<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> chromosomal rearrangements segregating in field populations. In<br />

general, biological and phylogenetic species concepts group strains similarly and<br />

into a larger number <strong>of</strong> groups than those identified on the basis <strong>of</strong> morphology<br />

alone. In F. graminearum, however, the number <strong>of</strong> morphological and biological<br />

species is the same, i.e., one. These results could be explained in at least two<br />

ways. The explanation voiced the loudest is that the lineages are incipient species<br />

and that the phylogenetic analysis has caught this group in the act <strong>of</strong> evolving<br />

from a single species into many. Alternatively, the phylogenetic lineages may be<br />

separate populations that have evolved independently for some time but are still a<br />

part <strong>of</strong> a single common species, much as Eskimos and Australian aborigines are<br />

in humans. Identifying natural populations where “hybrids” between lineages may<br />

occur under field conditions remains a key to the competitive evaluation <strong>of</strong> these<br />

hypotheses, with populations <strong>of</strong> F. graminearum in South America and South<br />

Korea <strong>of</strong>fering, perhaps, the best opportunities to do so.<br />

Keywords: biological species, sexual fertility<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!