12.07.2013 Views

EFS12- Book of abstracts - Contact

EFS12- Book of abstracts - Contact

EFS12- Book of abstracts - Contact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SESSION 2: SECONDARY METABOLITES – BIOCHEMISTRY,<br />

BIOSYNTHESIS, FEED AND FOOD SAFETY<br />

Ecological role <strong>of</strong> mycotoxins produced by Fusarium<br />

graminearum<br />

M. Abid 1 , L. Fayolle 1 , C. Héraud 1 , P. Mangin 2 , L. Falchetto 2 , N. Gautheron 1 , J.<br />

Laurent 1 , E. Gautheron 1 , V. Edel-Hermann 1 , C. Steinberg 1<br />

1 INRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie 17 rue Sully, BP 86510, F-21000 Dijon, France; 2 INRA, UE Domaine<br />

d’Epoisses, F-21110 Bretenières, France<br />

E-mail: christian.steinberg@dijon.inra.fr<br />

Fusarium graminearum is a plant pathogenic fungus, producing mycotoxins some<br />

<strong>of</strong> which remain in the crop residues let in the field after harvest. Whether the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> mycotoxins in the crop residues gives an advantage to F.<br />

graminearum to survive and develop a primary inoculum in the presence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

whole soil biota including fungi, bacteria, protozoa, nematodes and earthworms<br />

was tested. The impact <strong>of</strong> deoxynivalenol (DON) on the soil communities was<br />

evaluated in the field and in microcosms, in wheat and in maize residues under<br />

tillage and no-tillage conditions. The disease development and the yield were<br />

noted in the field experiment. Some DON resistant active fungal decomposers<br />

and nitrogen fixing bacteria were picked and the dynamics <strong>of</strong> F. graminearum was<br />

observed in their presence, in the presence or absence <strong>of</strong> DON.<br />

DON in crop residues had an impact on the biotic components <strong>of</strong> the soil but the<br />

impact depended on the communities and on the location <strong>of</strong> the residues. The<br />

molecular biomass showed that fungal and bacterial densities were significantly<br />

affected by DON. The latter played significant role on the structure <strong>of</strong> bacterial<br />

and protozoan community while the nematodes and fungal communities remained<br />

unaffected. However, the minimal inhibitory concentration tests revealed that the<br />

susceptibility <strong>of</strong> some competitive fungal strains to DON was dose-dependent.<br />

Earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris) were not affected by the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

mycotoxin. The degradation <strong>of</strong> DON in the residues was dependent on the time,<br />

the location <strong>of</strong> residues and the soil biota.<br />

Obviously DON gave no advantage for the survival and development <strong>of</strong> primary<br />

inoculum during the decomposition <strong>of</strong> crop residues in the soil. Moreover fungal<br />

decomposers can be selected on their enzymatic potential towards organic matter<br />

more than on the DON resistance to increase the degradation <strong>of</strong> the straw left at<br />

the surface and limit the subsequent development <strong>of</strong> F. graminearum.<br />

Keywords: Biological control, habitat, soil ecology, saprophytic phase<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!