12.07.2013 Views

EFS12- Book of abstracts - Contact

EFS12- Book of abstracts - Contact

EFS12- Book of abstracts - Contact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SESSION 5: DISEASE CONTROL AND FORECASTING MODELS<br />

P124 - Saprophytic survival <strong>of</strong> Fusarium graminearum<br />

in crop residues<br />

J. Leplat 1 , L. Falchetto 2 , P. Mangin 2 , C. Heraud 1 , E. Gautheron 1 , N.<br />

Gautheron 1 , V. Edel-Hermann 1 , C. Steinberg 1<br />

1 INRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie 17 rue Sully, BP 86510, F-21000 Dijon, France; 2 INRA, UE Domaine<br />

d’Epoisses, F-21110 Bretenières, France<br />

Email: christian.steinberg@dijon.inra.fr<br />

Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important disease altering wheat<br />

crops. A field experiment was conducted to better understand the saprotrophic<br />

development <strong>of</strong> Fusarium graminearum and its consequences on FHB, to<br />

characterize the relative importance <strong>of</strong> the different sources <strong>of</strong> FHB inoculum and<br />

the accumulation <strong>of</strong> mycotoxins in grains and subsequently, to determine early<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> future disease development on ears and accumulation <strong>of</strong> mycotoxins<br />

in grains. The development <strong>of</strong> F. graminearum in the soil and crop residues was<br />

monitored in controlled conditions.<br />

The inoculum hosted by seeds and/or buried with crop residues in the topsoil had<br />

only an effect on the winter development <strong>of</strong> the disease. In contrast, the main<br />

source <strong>of</strong> inoculum causing FHB disease on ears and accumulation <strong>of</strong> mycotoxins<br />

in wheat kernels came from residues left on the soil surface. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> plant<br />

development from sowing to harvest, crop management and soil and weather<br />

conditions produced a large database. Unfortunately, the role <strong>of</strong> climate was<br />

decisive in the development <strong>of</strong> the Fusarium-host plant interaction, thus prevented<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> early indicators to accurately predict the risks <strong>of</strong> yield losses and<br />

accumulation <strong>of</strong> mycotoxins involved.<br />

F. graminearum was regulated by the soil micr<strong>of</strong>lora. However, crop residues<br />

provide the fungus spatial and trophic niches favourable to its development. The<br />

exploitation <strong>of</strong> these niches by F. graminearum depends on the nature (previous<br />

crop and C/N) <strong>of</strong> the residues. Maize stubbles provide a greater carrying capacity<br />

than wheat straw and rapeseed residues while mustard has a suppressive effect<br />

for the fungus.<br />

The management <strong>of</strong> crop residues is a key point to control the development <strong>of</strong><br />

FHB. A strong emphasis should be placed on the biological decomposition <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

residues at the soil surface or/and on the use <strong>of</strong> suppressive intermediate crops<br />

such as mustard to limit the soil inoculum potential <strong>of</strong> saprotrophic F.<br />

graminearum.<br />

Keywords: early indicators, ecological niche, epidemiology, conservatoire<br />

biological control<br />

218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!