EFS12- Book of abstracts - Contact

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SESSION 5: DISEASE CONTROL AND FORECASTING MODELS P113 - Agronomic practices and risk for mycotoxins in northern cereal production P. Parikka 1 , S. Rämö 1 , V. Hietaniemi 1 , L. Alakukku 2 1 MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Plant Production Research, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland; 2 University of Helsinki, Department of Agricultural Sciences, Latokartanonkaari 5, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland E-mail: paivi.parikka@mtt.fi Environmental conditions and agronomic practices have impact on prevalence, infection and mycotoxin formation of Fusarium- species. Reduced tillage creates different environments for survival of pathogens in stubble and straw in soil or on soil surface. The microbial populations change during prolonged no-till practices and cereal rotation and Fusarium species with good saprophytic ability can increase. Pre-crop can even have less impact on Fusarium than tillage practices. In Finland, a short-term trial comparing direct drilling and autumn ploughing showed reduction in prevalence of DON producing F. culmorum in no-till conditions. Under tillage, DON-producers are observed to infect later, but still DON contents can be higher than under no-till. Both F. culmorum and F. graminearum can be more prevalent under tillage than direct-drilling, depending on weather conditions. On barley, control of leaf diseases with fungicide has increased F. culmorum infections and DON contaminations. Generally, F. avenaceum and F. tricinctum benefit of direct drilling and reduced tillage on oats and barley. F. poae mainly seems to increase under tillage and high infections in warm conditions can result in increased nivalenol contaminations. Both nivalenol and DON contents in grain increase towards harvest. Fusarium langsethiae can be favored by no-till, especially in dry conditions. Fungicide application to control leaf diseases can in warm conditions and under no-till increase F. langsethiae infection and T-2/HT-2 contaminations on barley. While head blight control at ear emergence is not observed to not reduce F. langsethiae infection of oats and barley, F. sporotrichioides can be strongly affected. In the earlier studies, F. langsethiae infections and T-2/HT-2 contents were higher on oats than on barley. During grain development, however, F. langsethiae infections can be very high also on barley and observed T-2/HT-2 contaminations high in warm conditions. In cool conditions infections develop later and oats is more affected than barley. Keywords: tillage, fungicides, crop rotation, mycotoxins 207
SESSION 5: DISEASE CONTROL AND FORECASTING MODELS P114 - Effect of direct drilling on Fusarium foot and root rot in durum wheat, barley and oat in Tunisia S. Chekali 1 , S. Gargouri 2 , M. Ben Hamouda 3 , H. Cheihk M'Hamed 4 , B. Nasraoui 5 1 Pôle Régional de Recherche et de Développement Agricoles du Nord-Ouest semi-aride à El Kef. B.P 221 -7100 Le Kef, Tunisia; 2 Laboratoire de protection des végétaux, Institut national de la recherche agronomique de Tunisie, rue hédi karray 2049, Tunisia; 3 Laboratoire de physiologie végétale Ecole Supérieure d’Agriculture de Kef, 7119 Le Kef, Tunisia; 4 Laboratoire d’agronomie, Institut national de la recherche agronomique de Tunisie, rue hédi karray 2049, Tunisia; 5 Laboratoire de phytopathologie, Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie, 43 Avenue Charles Nicolle, Cité Mahrajène, 1082 Belvédère-Tunis, Tunisia E-mail: samirachekali@yahoo.fr Conservation agriculture (CA) based on direct drilling (DD) emerged in Tunisia since 1999-2000 as an alternative to conventional agriculture (CA). Its main objective is to ensure yield stability and rebuilt the soil organic matter to control soil erosion. But, some previous works showed the risk of pathogens favored by conditions of permanent mulching. No previous work was done on CA/DD impact on Fusarium foot and root rot in Tunisia. The effect of DD on Fusarium foot and root rot incidence for durum wheat, oat and barley over three-year experience (2009/10, 2010/11, 2011/12) was studied in Northwest Tunisia. Roots and crown isolates, from the three straw cereals, revealed that Fusarium culmorum was the most observed pathogen. Disease incidences were determined by recovery frequency of this fungus. DD Increased significantly (P
Page 1 and 2:
Bordeaux EFS12 12 th European Fusar
Page 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Welcome from the
Page 7:
4 SPONSORSHIP The 12 th European Fu
Page 11 and 12:
8 13:00 - 14:00 Lunch 14:00 - 15:00
Page 13 and 14:
10 Session 4: Genetics of Hosts - P
Page 15 and 16:
12 Thursday, May 16 th Session 6: F
Page 17 and 18:
Evidence for birth-and-death evolut
Page 19 and 20:
Future challenges of Fusarium and m
Page 21 and 22:
P35 - Screening deoxynivalenol in o
Page 23 and 24:
P76 - Fusarium verticillioides and
Page 25 and 26:
P113 - Agronomic practices and risk
Page 28:
ORAL PRESENTATIONS 25
Page 32 and 33:
KEYNOTE LECTURE SESSION 1: FUSARIUM
Page 34 and 35:
SESSION 1: FUSARIUM - GENETICS, GEN
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
KEYNOTE LECTURE SESSION 2: SECONDAR
Page 44 and 45:
SESSION 2: SECONDARY METABOLITES -
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50:
Page 53 and 54:
SESSION 3: PATHOGENESIS - EPIDEMIOL
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 64 and 65:
KEYNOTE LECTURE 1 SESSION 4: GENETI
Page 66 and 67:
SESSION 4: GENETICS OF HOSTS - PLAN
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
KEYNOTE LECTURE 2 SESSION 4: GENETI
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
KEYNOTE LECTURE SESSION 5: DISEASE
Page 80 and 81:
SESSION 5: DISEASE CONTROL AND FORE
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86:
Page 89 and 90:
SESSION 6: FUTURE CHALLENGE FOR EUR
Page 91 and 92:
SESSION 6: FUTURE CHALLENGE FOR EUR
Page 94:
POSTER PRESENTATIONS 91
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
134
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160: SESSION 3: PATHOGENESIS - EPIDEMIOL
Page 177 and 178: SESSION 4: GENETICS OF HOSTS - PLAN
Page 207 and 208: 204
Page 209: SESSION 5: DISEASE CONTROL AND FORE
Page 213 and 214: SESSION 5: DISEASE CONTROL AND FORE
Page 233 and 234: SESSION 6: FUTURE CHALLENGE FOR EUR
Page 241 and 242: de Hoog G. S., 89, 114, 236 de Kler
Page 243 and 244: Ponts N., 33, 36, 82, 94, 104, 106,
Page 245 and 246: 242
Page 247 and 248: BOKU-University of Natural Resource
Page 249 and 250: touatisihem03@yahoo.fr He Xinyao In
Page 251 and 252: steve.oliver@bioc.cam.ac. uk Ortega
Page 253 and 254: Subramaniam Gopal Agriculture and A
show all

EFS12- Book of abstracts - Contact

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?