07.07.2013 Views

214044_The_Essa ... rd_Of_Montaigne_Vol_II.pdf - OUDL Home

214044_The_Essa ... rd_Of_Montaigne_Vol_II.pdf - OUDL Home

214044_The_Essa ... rd_Of_Montaigne_Vol_II.pdf - OUDL Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE SECOND BOOKE 279<br />

ipse homo est:¹ ' <strong>The</strong> meane is clearely wonderful!<br />

whereby spirits cleave to our bodies, nor can it be comprehended<br />

by man, and that is very man.' Yet is<br />

there no doubt made of him : for mens opinions are<br />

received after ancient beliefs by authority and upon<br />

credit; as if it were a religion and a law. What is<br />

commonly held of it, is received as a gibrish or fustian<br />

tongue. This trueth, with all her framing of arguments<br />

and proporcioning of proofes, is received as a firme and<br />

solid body, which is no more shaken, which is no more<br />

judged. On the other side, every one the best he can<br />

patcheth up and comforteth this received beliefe with all<br />

the meanes his reason can affo<strong>rd</strong> him, which is an instrument<br />

very supple, pliable, and yeelding to all<br />

shapes. 'Thus is the world filled with toyes, and<br />

overwhelmed in lies and leasings.' <strong>The</strong> reason that<br />

men doubt not much of things is that common impressions<br />

are neyer throughly tride and sifted, their ground<br />

is not sounded, nor where the fault and weaknes lieth.<br />

Men only debate and question of the branch, not of<br />

the tree: they aske not whether a thing he true, but<br />

whether it was understood or meant thus and thus.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y enquire not whether Galen hath spoken any<br />

thing of worth, but whether thus, or so, or otherwise.<br />

Truly there was some reason this bridle or<br />

restraint of our judgements liberty, and this tyranny<br />

over our beliefs should extend it selfe even to schooles<br />

and arts. <strong>The</strong> God of scholasticall learning is Aristotle:<br />

It is religion to debate of his o<strong>rd</strong>inances, as those of<br />

Lycurgus in Sparta. His doctrine is to us as a canon<br />

law, which peradventure is as false as another. I know<br />

not why I should or might not as soone and as easie<br />

accept either Platoes Ideas, or Epicurus his atomes and<br />

indivisible things, or the fulnesse and emptines of<br />

Leucippus and Democritus, or the water of 1 hales, or<br />

Anaximanders infinite of nature, or the aire of Diogenes,<br />

or the numbers or proportion of Pythagoras, or the<br />

infinite of Parmenides, or the single-one of Musseus, or<br />

the water and fire of Apollodorus, or the similarie and<br />

¹ AUG, De Spir. et Anim. De Civ. Dei, xxi. 10.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!