Parks - IUCN
Parks - IUCN
Parks - IUCN
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PARKS VOL 9 NO 3 • OCTOBER 1999<br />
to society and our commitments to nature and culture in the face of such challenges?<br />
One option that has been receiving considerable attention during recent years is<br />
‘bioregional planning and management.’ (Miller 1996, TNC 1997, UNEP 1998, WWF<br />
1998). The bioregional approach seeks to maintain biological diversity across entire<br />
landscape regions while meeting people’s needs. The bioregional approach embodies<br />
key characteristics (below), combining scientific, informational, social, and economic<br />
considerations to define management opportunities and to implement programmes<br />
of action and investment. A related approach has also been promoted for mountain<br />
protected areas by Hamilton (1996) involving corridors of connected core areas<br />
through managed nature-friendly lands among mountain ranges, or from summits to<br />
the lowlands.<br />
Key characteristics of bioregional management<br />
Drawing from the elements and experience of Bioregionalism, Man and the<br />
Biosphere Program, International Conservation and Development Projects, Protected<br />
Area Management, and Ecosystem Management, we can identify 14 defining<br />
characteristics of bioregional management work.<br />
1 . Large, biotically viable regions<br />
Bioregional management programmes embrace regions large enough to include the<br />
habitats and ecosystem functions and processes needed to make biotic communities<br />
and populations ecologically viable over the long-term. These regions must be able<br />
to accommodate migratory patterns, anticipate nature’s time cycles, and absorb the<br />
impacts of global change.<br />
2. Leadership and management<br />
The leadership to establish bioregional programmes may come from public agencies<br />
or from the community of residents and resource users. The tasks of convening<br />
stakeholders, preparing and negotiating vision statements, planning and implementing<br />
agreed upon activities can be shared cooperatively between public and private<br />
entities, or fully community-based.<br />
3. A structure of cores, corridors, and matrices<br />
These programmes include core wildland sites that feature representative samples<br />
of the region’s characteristic biodiversity. Ideally such sites, which may already be<br />
designated as protected areas, are linked by corridors of natural or restored wild<br />
cover to permit migration and adaptation to global change. Both the core sites and<br />
the corridors are nested within a matrix of mixed land uses and ownership patterns.<br />
4. Economic sustainability<br />
The livelihoods of people living and working within the bioregion, including those<br />
in industry, and especially in the matrix, are encouraged. Appropriate incentives to<br />
make optimal use of local resources, and apply sustainable technologies, are<br />
combined with a system for sharing the costs and benefits of conservation and<br />
managed use fairly.<br />
5. Full involvement of stakeholders<br />
All parties who can affect or benefit from the resources in the region develop skills,<br />
2