07.07.2013 Views

Parks - IUCN

Parks - IUCN

Parks - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PARKS VOL 9 NO 3 • OCTOBER 1999<br />

to society and our commitments to nature and culture in the face of such challenges?<br />

One option that has been receiving considerable attention during recent years is<br />

‘bioregional planning and management.’ (Miller 1996, TNC 1997, UNEP 1998, WWF<br />

1998). The bioregional approach seeks to maintain biological diversity across entire<br />

landscape regions while meeting people’s needs. The bioregional approach embodies<br />

key characteristics (below), combining scientific, informational, social, and economic<br />

considerations to define management opportunities and to implement programmes<br />

of action and investment. A related approach has also been promoted for mountain<br />

protected areas by Hamilton (1996) involving corridors of connected core areas<br />

through managed nature-friendly lands among mountain ranges, or from summits to<br />

the lowlands.<br />

Key characteristics of bioregional management<br />

Drawing from the elements and experience of Bioregionalism, Man and the<br />

Biosphere Program, International Conservation and Development Projects, Protected<br />

Area Management, and Ecosystem Management, we can identify 14 defining<br />

characteristics of bioregional management work.<br />

1 . Large, biotically viable regions<br />

Bioregional management programmes embrace regions large enough to include the<br />

habitats and ecosystem functions and processes needed to make biotic communities<br />

and populations ecologically viable over the long-term. These regions must be able<br />

to accommodate migratory patterns, anticipate nature’s time cycles, and absorb the<br />

impacts of global change.<br />

2. Leadership and management<br />

The leadership to establish bioregional programmes may come from public agencies<br />

or from the community of residents and resource users. The tasks of convening<br />

stakeholders, preparing and negotiating vision statements, planning and implementing<br />

agreed upon activities can be shared cooperatively between public and private<br />

entities, or fully community-based.<br />

3. A structure of cores, corridors, and matrices<br />

These programmes include core wildland sites that feature representative samples<br />

of the region’s characteristic biodiversity. Ideally such sites, which may already be<br />

designated as protected areas, are linked by corridors of natural or restored wild<br />

cover to permit migration and adaptation to global change. Both the core sites and<br />

the corridors are nested within a matrix of mixed land uses and ownership patterns.<br />

4. Economic sustainability<br />

The livelihoods of people living and working within the bioregion, including those<br />

in industry, and especially in the matrix, are encouraged. Appropriate incentives to<br />

make optimal use of local resources, and apply sustainable technologies, are<br />

combined with a system for sharing the costs and benefits of conservation and<br />

managed use fairly.<br />

5. Full involvement of stakeholders<br />

All parties who can affect or benefit from the resources in the region develop skills,<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!