Parks - IUCN

Parks - IUCN Parks - IUCN

cmsdata.iucn.org
from cmsdata.iucn.org More from this publisher
07.07.2013 Views

PARKS VOL 9 NO 3 • OCTOBER 1999 The second phase of this process is placing conservation values on each of these remnants, then producing a map of remnants within macro corridors, each remnant being coloured according to conservation value or priority. This map is assisting the decision-making process of how and where to allocate resources when implementing on-the-ground works. Representatives of the community, as well as local and state government land managers participate in planning the project. They provide information on progress to the general community at a local level, as well as identifying and developing projects to strengthen and protect macro corridors using best practice management information and methods. They work closely with local advisory networks (e.g. Bushcare, Coastcare, Landcare, Rivercare) and community groups to integrate the macro corridor network with other projects within the Region. A biological monitoring programme is being established across the macro corridor network. It incorporates some existing monitoring sites such as the ‘Mountain Peak’ monitoring sites (Barrett, 1996; Barrett and Gillen, 1997), the Fitzgerald River Biosphere monitoring sites (Sanders, 1996; Watson and Sanders, 1997) and CALM’s fox baiting monitoring sites used to monitor fauna recovery. The flora and fauna data collected may provide feedback on the effectiveness of the macro corridor network and could play an important part in any international network of long-term marine and terrestrial monitoring sites which gather information on topics such as global change, biodiversity, and forest health. Where to from here...? the grand vision... Ultimately we seek the establishment and community ownership of a strategic macro corridor network across the entire South Coast Region of Western Australia. This will comprise major macro corridors, especially along the coast and running inland along river valleys, but also narrower corridors, good quality remnant vegetation, and a gradation down to ‘micro’ corridor establishment or protection at the individual farm or property level. This is somewhat analogous to a road transport system consisting of an interconnected network of wide free ways, highways, major arterial roads, secondary roads, minor roads, and four-wheel-drive bush tracks. Furthermore, the macro corridor network will be multidimensional (i.e. latitudinal, longitudinal, and altitudinal) thereby linking all components of the landscape and including all major vegetation types and habitats. In essence this will be an expansion out across the whole region of the biosphere reserve principles of the Fitzgerald River National Park which lies at the central hub of the macro-corridor network (Figure 2). Finally, there is potential for the macro corridor network to be regarded as one protected area comprising a range of IUCN categories, in particular categories I, II, III, IV, and VI. Thus there will be wilderness areas, national parks, nature reserves, and bushland protected through other agencies and landowners – but all interconnected through the one network. Watch this space! Acknowledgments We acknowledge Kenton Miller and Larry Hamilton for providing the ‘springboard’ for our existing interest in corridor connections to be expanded to a full bioregional strategy. 14

JOHN WATSON AND PETER WILKINS We thank Sandra Maciejewski, Keith Claymore, Alan Danks, Ian Herford, and Alan Walker for useful comments in early drafts of this paper. We also acknowledge the Natural Heritage Trust (NHT) Bushcare programme and CALM for funding the Western Australian South Coast Macro Corridor Network Project. Additional background The February 1997 issue of Parks 7(1) focused on protected areas in Western Australia, particularly along the South Coast. The issue was compiled to help provide background on protected area and threatened species work that would be included in a full-day field trip during the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) mid-term symposium ‘From Islands to Networks’ held at Albany, Australia, in November 1997. One of the key sessions at that symposium was by Kenton Miller and Larry Hamilton where they presented a case for a global network of large ‘bioregional initiatives’ as part of a ‘scaling up’ to reach out from ‘island’ protected areas through major networks (Miller and Hamilton, 1997). This paper presents an update on progress with our ‘South Coast Macro Corridor Project’ – now recognised as a component of the WCPA global bioregional initiative network. Four papers from the February 1997 Parks issue are particularly useful in understanding the background to our Macro Corridor Project viz an overview on regional planning and protected areas (Watson, 1997), a historical and descriptive review of the Fitzgerald River National Park Biosphere Reserve (Watson and Sanders, 1997), a series of case studies on threatened species management in the region (Gillen et al. 1997) and a more specific paper on mountain protected area management issues (Barrett and Gillen, 1997). In the same issue a paper by Andrew Bennett provides an excellent Australian overview of the role of habitat linkages, connectivity and corridors (Bennett, 1997). References Bailey, C. 1996. Western Shield – bringing the wildlife back from the brink of extinction. Landscope Winter 1996. Department of Conservation and Land Management, Perth, Western Australia. Barrett, S. 1996. A Biological Survey of Mountains in Southern Western Australia. Natural Reserves System Cooperative Program No. AW03. Department of Conservation and Land Management, Albany, and Australian Nature Conservation Agency, Canberra. Barrett, S. and Gillen, K. 1997. Mountain protected areas of South Western Australia, Parks 7(1):35–42. Bennett, A.F. 1997. Habitat linkages – a key element in an integrated landscape approach to conservation. Parks 7(1):43–49. Bennet, A.F. 1998. Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. x + 254pp. Department of Environment, Sport and Territories. 1996. National Strategy for the Conservation of Australia’s Biological Diversity. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. Department of Conservation and Land Management 1991. South Coast Region, Regional Management 1992–2002. Management Plan No. 24. CALM, Perth. Gale, K. 1999. Rabbit Control – Rabbit Calicivirus Disease (RCD). Farmnote, Agriculture Western Australia. George, R.J., McFarlane, D.J., and Speed, R.J. 1995. The consequences of a changing hydrologic environment for native vegetation in Southwestern Australia. Pp 9–22. In DA Saunders, JL Craig and EM Mattiske (eds). Nature Conservation 4: The Role of Networks. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton. Gillen, K., Danks, A., Courtenay, J., and Hickman, E. 1997. Threatened species management on the south coast of Western Australia, Parks 7(1) 23–30. Lambeck, R.J. 1997. Focal Species: A Multi-Species Umbrella for Nature Conservation. Conservation Biology 11:849–856. 15

PARKS VOL 9 NO 3 • OCTOBER 1999<br />

The second phase of this process is placing conservation values on each of these<br />

remnants, then producing a map of remnants within macro corridors, each remnant<br />

being coloured according to conservation value or priority. This map is assisting the<br />

decision-making process of how and where to allocate resources when implementing<br />

on-the-ground works.<br />

Representatives of the community, as well as local and state government land<br />

managers participate in planning the project. They provide information on progress<br />

to the general community at a local level, as well as identifying and developing<br />

projects to strengthen and protect macro corridors using best practice management<br />

information and methods. They work closely with local advisory networks (e.g.<br />

Bushcare, Coastcare, Landcare, Rivercare) and community groups to integrate the<br />

macro corridor network with other projects within the Region.<br />

A biological monitoring programme is being established across the macro<br />

corridor network. It incorporates some existing monitoring sites such as the<br />

‘Mountain Peak’ monitoring sites (Barrett, 1996; Barrett and Gillen, 1997), the<br />

Fitzgerald River Biosphere monitoring sites (Sanders, 1996; Watson and Sanders,<br />

1997) and CALM’s fox baiting monitoring sites used to monitor fauna recovery. The<br />

flora and fauna data collected may provide feedback on the effectiveness of the<br />

macro corridor network and could play an important part in any international<br />

network of long-term marine and terrestrial monitoring sites which gather information<br />

on topics such as global change, biodiversity, and forest health.<br />

Where to from here...? the grand vision...<br />

Ultimately we seek the establishment and community ownership of a strategic macro<br />

corridor network across the entire South Coast Region of Western Australia. This will<br />

comprise major macro corridors, especially along the coast and running inland along<br />

river valleys, but also narrower corridors, good quality remnant vegetation, and a<br />

gradation down to ‘micro’ corridor establishment or protection at the individual farm<br />

or property level. This is somewhat analogous to a road transport system consisting<br />

of an interconnected network of wide free ways, highways, major arterial roads,<br />

secondary roads, minor roads, and four-wheel-drive bush tracks. Furthermore, the<br />

macro corridor network will be multidimensional (i.e. latitudinal, longitudinal, and<br />

altitudinal) thereby linking all components of the landscape and including all major<br />

vegetation types and habitats.<br />

In essence this will be an expansion out across the whole region of the biosphere<br />

reserve principles of the Fitzgerald River National Park which lies at the central hub<br />

of the macro-corridor network (Figure 2).<br />

Finally, there is potential for the macro corridor network to be regarded as one<br />

protected area comprising a range of <strong>IUCN</strong> categories, in particular categories I, II,<br />

III, IV, and VI. Thus there will be wilderness areas, national parks, nature reserves,<br />

and bushland protected through other agencies and landowners – but all interconnected<br />

through the one network.<br />

Watch this space!<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

We acknowledge Kenton Miller and Larry Hamilton for providing the ‘springboard’ for<br />

our existing interest in corridor connections to be expanded to a full bioregional<br />

strategy.<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!