07.07.2013 Views

Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

■ engenderment of an ethic of well-being and<br />

integrity; and<br />

■ a definition of sustainability.<br />

At the present time the Department of<br />

Environmental Planning and Management at the<br />

University of Peshawar, in partnership with the<br />

Government PP&H Department and the Forest<br />

Management Centre, among others (such as PE&D<br />

Department), is developing a mandate to lead a<br />

major land use planning process. This is an effective<br />

approach, given the technology, expertise, and personnel<br />

involved, because it reduces the likelihood<br />

that a single lead agency, with a specific mandate,<br />

would emphasize the principal resource for which<br />

they are responsible. Specific land use plans must<br />

stress the need for balanced consideration of all<br />

resource needs and uses. This is particularly true for<br />

resources without obvious economic return, such as<br />

recreational uses and wilderness or amenity values.<br />

Some land use allocation and management is relatively<br />

straightforward. For example, private agricultural<br />

land requires little or no Government intervention<br />

unless there are obvious, voluntary improvements that<br />

can be made with respect to crop productivity or animal<br />

husbandry. In forested areas, however, particularly<br />

reserved or protected forests, a range of activities<br />

takes place. Some fuelwood collection occurs, some<br />

livestock grazing, some recreation, some wildlife management<br />

and so on. Each of these activities is managed<br />

by a different department, and in some cases<br />

there are donor-assisted development activities under<br />

way. Of the latter, only the most recent generation are<br />

being undertaken in an integrated fashion.<br />

Two major problems continue to plague efforts to<br />

integrate environmental management activities, particularly<br />

in the multiple use areas. The first of these<br />

is institutional: there is little history of Government<br />

departments either being expected or wishing to<br />

work together. There is, in effect, no mandate to do<br />

so. So a mandate should be created and this can<br />

be included in the NWFP Environment Act.<br />

Secondly, it would be naive to assume that such a<br />

system can be implemented comprehensively and<br />

simultaneously throughout the province. So pilot<br />

projects must be undertaken in land use planning<br />

and integrated resource management.<br />

Integrated resource management must not be seen<br />

solely as a Government activity. Rather, in a manner<br />

similar to the district-level planning teams and round<br />

tables recommended elsewhere in this SPCS, it would<br />

be useful to form a partnership with private landholders<br />

or resource users in an area. The District<br />

Development Advisory Committee mandates can be<br />

expanded to cover land use planning or integrated<br />

resource management. This would be a useful mechanism<br />

for ensuring that the appropriate interests are<br />

involved and have an opportunity to affect the outcome.<br />

Such a mechanism can be given legal cover<br />

under the partnership provisions of the new provincial<br />

environmental legislation. Membership would be<br />

expanded to include non-Government members as<br />

well as Government employees.<br />

6 . 9<br />

G O V E R N A N C E & C A P A C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T 6<br />

E N V I R O N M E N TAL IMPA C T<br />

ASSESSMENT PROCESSES<br />

When Government or private industry want to build<br />

projects such as dams, highways, or factories, there<br />

may be negative effects on the environment. A set<br />

of questions needs to be asked about these effects.<br />

The answers constitute an impact assessment. The<br />

following questions are typical in an Environmental<br />

Impact Assessment:<br />

■ how much land will be required?<br />

■ what effect will the projects have on the land?<br />

■ are there viable alternative sites or better project<br />

d e s i g n s ?<br />

■ will there be air pollution?<br />

■ will there be water pollution?<br />

■ will flora and fauna be affected?<br />

■ will local people be affected?<br />

Answers to these questions must be weighed<br />

against the economic and other benefits of the projects<br />

to help in decisions about their acceptability.<br />

Although the Federal environmental legislation<br />

calls for an EIA prior to any major development activity,<br />

there is little public knowledge of this requirement,<br />

and they are rarely completed. Even if one is<br />

done and reviewed, there are no requirements that<br />

the results must have an impact on the final design of<br />

a project. The environmental effects are evaluated,<br />

SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY 59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!