Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

cmsdata.iucn.org
from cmsdata.iucn.org More from this publisher
07.07.2013 Views

6 from polythene bags. Consumer choice is the ultimate economic instrument. In general, it is good public policy to examine such questions holistically, looking at regulatory needs but also at non-regulatory options, using the criteria just outlined. 6 . 7 G O V E R N A N C E & C A P A C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T S T R ATEGIC PLANNING PROCESSES At present, much of the work of the ES of the PE&D Department is focused on the preparation of project concept documents or related procedural requirements. In addition, a considerable amount of time is spent doing environmental reviews of projects that are forwarded to the PE&D for approval. These reviews are largely ad hoc, because a formal environmental impact assessment process has not been put in place. So the criteria for the informal reviews are determined by the individual responsible for the critique. This same situation exists within the EPA. It is expected to improve with the introduction of new environmental legislation, especially the environmental impact assessment process. The mandate of the ES, due largely to the lack of staff in already approved positions, is not being fulfilled. An annual strategic planning cycle that determines, with regional input, the environmental priorities of the Government should be the principal task of the ES. The SPCS will not achieve one of its core objectives if this task is not completed during the ‘transition to implementation’ phase. There are many approaches to strategic planning available, and several have been experimented with during the preparation of the first generation of the SPCS. They have included such approaches as logical framework analysis, but no one process has proved superior. However, an early decision should be taken about an annual priority setting and strategic planning exercise, rather than simply maintaining the existing process of listing of projects in the annual development plan. A similar process is needed for the overall work plan of the section itself. This cannot occur until the existing positions are filled with professionals from environmental fields who are trained in strategic 58 SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY planning processes and in developing a mechanism for prioritizing environmental issues. 6 . 8 ENVIRONMENT & LAND USE PLANNING PROCESSES Coordination of Government activities at the district level was raised as an issue in every public meeting held during the public consultation process. Many examples of a lack of integration of departmental functions in the field were reiterated from meeting to meeting. Varying suggestions for better coordination were forthcoming. The first suggestion was for the improvement of environmental baseline data. This has begun with the development of the first Environmental Profile of the NWFP, an exceptionally useful document. A second important suggestion was for district level, legally sanctioned land use planning processes, and for a subsequent system of integrated resource management. Land use planning comes first, beginning with resource inventories and capability analysis, followed eventually by choices about the optimum use of land. Choices include setting aside land for agriculture, expansion of urban facilities, forestry, parks and protected areas, and so on. Once these choices are made and codified, more routine management activities can begin. The main components of a land use plan will include: ■ a description of each land use and their interactions; ■ a comprehensive and interdisciplinary a p p r o a c h ; ■ consideration of people and their activities in the ecosystem; ■ use of natural rather than arbitrary boundaries; ■ consideration of how the different levels of ecosystem function; ■ establishment of goals, and an active management approach; ■ incorporation of all stakeholders and relevant institutions; ■ anticipation of research and planning needs, while remaining flexible;

■ engenderment of an ethic of well-being and integrity; and ■ a definition of sustainability. At the present time the Department of Environmental Planning and Management at the University of Peshawar, in partnership with the Government PP&H Department and the Forest Management Centre, among others (such as PE&D Department), is developing a mandate to lead a major land use planning process. This is an effective approach, given the technology, expertise, and personnel involved, because it reduces the likelihood that a single lead agency, with a specific mandate, would emphasize the principal resource for which they are responsible. Specific land use plans must stress the need for balanced consideration of all resource needs and uses. This is particularly true for resources without obvious economic return, such as recreational uses and wilderness or amenity values. Some land use allocation and management is relatively straightforward. For example, private agricultural land requires little or no Government intervention unless there are obvious, voluntary improvements that can be made with respect to crop productivity or animal husbandry. In forested areas, however, particularly reserved or protected forests, a range of activities takes place. Some fuelwood collection occurs, some livestock grazing, some recreation, some wildlife management and so on. Each of these activities is managed by a different department, and in some cases there are donor-assisted development activities under way. Of the latter, only the most recent generation are being undertaken in an integrated fashion. Two major problems continue to plague efforts to integrate environmental management activities, particularly in the multiple use areas. The first of these is institutional: there is little history of Government departments either being expected or wishing to work together. There is, in effect, no mandate to do so. So a mandate should be created and this can be included in the NWFP Environment Act. Secondly, it would be naive to assume that such a system can be implemented comprehensively and simultaneously throughout the province. So pilot projects must be undertaken in land use planning and integrated resource management. Integrated resource management must not be seen solely as a Government activity. Rather, in a manner similar to the district-level planning teams and round tables recommended elsewhere in this SPCS, it would be useful to form a partnership with private landholders or resource users in an area. The District Development Advisory Committee mandates can be expanded to cover land use planning or integrated resource management. This would be a useful mechanism for ensuring that the appropriate interests are involved and have an opportunity to affect the outcome. Such a mechanism can be given legal cover under the partnership provisions of the new provincial environmental legislation. Membership would be expanded to include non-Government members as well as Government employees. 6 . 9 G O V E R N A N C E & C A P A C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T 6 E N V I R O N M E N TAL IMPA C T ASSESSMENT PROCESSES When Government or private industry want to build projects such as dams, highways, or factories, there may be negative effects on the environment. A set of questions needs to be asked about these effects. The answers constitute an impact assessment. The following questions are typical in an Environmental Impact Assessment: ■ how much land will be required? ■ what effect will the projects have on the land? ■ are there viable alternative sites or better project d e s i g n s ? ■ will there be air pollution? ■ will there be water pollution? ■ will flora and fauna be affected? ■ will local people be affected? Answers to these questions must be weighed against the economic and other benefits of the projects to help in decisions about their acceptability. Although the Federal environmental legislation calls for an EIA prior to any major development activity, there is little public knowledge of this requirement, and they are rarely completed. Even if one is done and reviewed, there are no requirements that the results must have an impact on the final design of a project. The environmental effects are evaluated, SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY 59

6<br />

from polythene bags. Consumer choice is the ultimate<br />

economic instrument.<br />

In general, it is good public policy to examine<br />

such questions holistically, looking at regulatory<br />

needs but also at non-regulatory options, using the<br />

criteria just outlined.<br />

6 . 7<br />

G O V E R N A N C E & C A P A C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T<br />

S T R ATEGIC PLANNING PROCESSES<br />

At present, much of the work of the ES of the PE&D<br />

Department is focused on the preparation of project<br />

concept documents or related procedural requirements.<br />

In addition, a considerable amount of time is<br />

spent doing environmental reviews of projects that<br />

are forwarded to the PE&D for approval. These<br />

reviews are largely ad hoc, because a formal environmental<br />

impact assessment process has not been<br />

put in place. So the criteria for the informal reviews<br />

are determined by the individual responsible for the<br />

critique. This same situation exists within the EPA. It is<br />

expected to improve with the introduction of new<br />

environmental legislation, especially the environmental<br />

impact assessment process.<br />

The mandate of the ES, due largely to the lack of<br />

staff in already approved positions, is not being fulfilled.<br />

An annual strategic planning cycle that determines,<br />

with regional input, the environmental priorities<br />

of the Government should be the principal task of the<br />

ES. The SPCS will not achieve one of its core objectives<br />

if this task is not completed during the ‘transition<br />

to implementation’ phase.<br />

There are many approaches to strategic planning<br />

available, and several have been experimented with<br />

during the preparation of the first generation of the<br />

SPCS. They have included such approaches as logical<br />

framework analysis, but no one process has<br />

proved superior. However, an early decision should<br />

be taken about an annual priority setting and strategic<br />

planning exercise, rather than simply maintaining<br />

the existing process of listing of projects in the annual<br />

development plan.<br />

A similar process is needed for the overall work<br />

plan of the section itself. This cannot occur until the<br />

existing positions are filled with professionals from<br />

environmental fields who are trained in strategic<br />

58 SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY<br />

planning processes and in developing a mechanism<br />

for prioritizing environmental issues.<br />

6 . 8<br />

ENVIRONMENT & LAND USE<br />

PLANNING PROCESSES<br />

Coordination of Government activities at the district<br />

level was raised as an issue in every public meeting<br />

held during the public consultation process. Many<br />

examples of a lack of integration of departmental<br />

functions in the field were reiterated from meeting to<br />

meeting. Varying suggestions for better coordination<br />

were forthcoming.<br />

The first suggestion was for the improvement of<br />

environmental baseline data. This has begun with the<br />

development of the first Environmental Profile of the<br />

NWFP, an exceptionally useful document.<br />

A second important suggestion was for district<br />

level, legally sanctioned land use planning processes,<br />

and for a subsequent system of integrated resource<br />

management. Land use planning comes first, beginning<br />

with resource inventories and capability analysis,<br />

followed eventually by choices about the optimum<br />

use of land. Choices include setting aside land for<br />

agriculture, expansion of urban facilities, forestry,<br />

parks and protected areas, and so on. Once these<br />

choices are made and codified, more routine management<br />

activities can begin.<br />

The main components of a land use plan will<br />

include:<br />

■ a description of each land use and their<br />

interactions;<br />

■ a comprehensive and interdisciplinary<br />

a p p r o a c h ;<br />

■ consideration of people and their activities in the<br />

ecosystem;<br />

■ use of natural rather than arbitrary boundaries;<br />

■ consideration of how the different levels of ecosystem<br />

function;<br />

■ establishment of goals, and an active management<br />

approach;<br />

■ incorporation of all stakeholders and relevant<br />

institutions;<br />

■ anticipation of research and planning needs,<br />

while remaining flexible;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!