Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

cmsdata.iucn.org
from cmsdata.iucn.org More from this publisher
07.07.2013 Views

6 G O V E R N A N C E & C A P A C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T At the core of the Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy is a set of structural reforms that are needed to improve the quality of governance in the province and to improve the ability of various agencies to operate in a manner that leads to sustainable development. These reforms correspond to a series of issues that reduce Government’s ability to function efficiently. Many of these are remnants of the colonial legacy of South Asia and have become ingrained in the institutional culture of the North West Frontier Province administration. As such, a great effort will be needed to affect change. This point needs to be constantly re-emphasized. This section of the SPCS is, in many respects, the most important because it deals with the core structural Government reforms. These ideas came largely from people at the district level meetings and from Government officials. Many of these individuals had never heard the term ‘sustainable development’. But they implicitly knew what it meant, and that it was not being achieved. Similarly, they wished to see a mandate for change adopted by the Government. The changes they called for, covered in this chapter, include: ■ potential reorganization of Government environmental responsibilities; ■ strengthening of the Planning, Environment and Development Department and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); ■ policy and programme reform; ■ law reform; ■ privatization, incentives, and partnership; ■ strategic planning processes; ■ environment and land use planning processes; ■ environmental impact assessment (EIA) processes; ■ state of environment reporting; ■ environmental research; and ■ other institution-strengthening initiatives. The SPCS commitments in each of these areas are found at the end of the chapter. Most of this chapter focuses on governmental governance, although the term governance may apply to the quality of leadership and institutions within civil society as well. Capacity development for a large portion of civil society is covered in Chapter 8. 50 SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY 6 . 1 KEY ISSUES & REFORMS There are a number of general issues and problems facing the NWFP Government as it attempts to undertake its development activities. These range from a lack of administrative accountability in some areas to an institutional culture that is overly centralized, paternalistic, and inflexible. Initiating change in this ‘culture’ takes much time and effort. One fundamental problem is a generally acknowledged difficulty with administrative accountability. The Rules of Business that define the organization of Government and departmental responsibilities are outdated and rigid. The institutional structure in Government is highly bureaucratic, and individuals are trained to adhere strictly to these procedures. Combined with the generally low rates of remuneration, there is little incentive for flexibility or creativity. Training in newly emerging fields, particularly multidisciplinary ones such as environmental management, is generally weak. Thus, although the Planning and Development Department added an Environment Section and was renamed the Planning, Environment, and Development (PE&D) Department, the rules governing who can work for the department did not permit those trained in environmental management—few as they are—to work for the Environment Section (ES). Obviously this has hampered capacity development initiatives. Although the problem is now solved, very little capacity development has occurred to date. Work must accelerate on the various training and support initiatives described here. The strengthening initiatives for the ES are taking place in the context of a much broader strengthening initiative for the entire PE&D Department. One objective of this larger project is to improve coordination and efficiency in processes used by the entire department. This involves finding mechanisms to streamline the policy and project approval processes. In this regard they are coordinating with the SPCS, incorporating environmental considerations into various existing approval processes. This is particularly important for various policy approval mechanisms because of their largely qualitative nature. They will eventually be further strengthened

y the inclusion of various environmental screening and review procedures in the proposed environmental legislation. Another related problem is that although the Government has established the ES in the PE&D Department and the EPA, significant environmental and natural resource management responsibilities are distributed throughout other governmental departments, most notably Forests, Physical Planning and Housing (PP&H), and Public Health Engineering as well as some others. These, too, need attention. There are discernible problems of coordination among these departments, partially due to the inflexibility of their mandates and limited resources, but also due to the territoriality that plagues Government worldwide. Thus, it may be useful to consider a wholesale restructuring of the environmental mandates of many of these departments. The case of the EPA is a special one, because its mandate comes from Federal Government instructions that are outdated and from legislation that is unenforceable, the Environmental Protection Ordinance 1983. The problem, in legal terms, is discussed below, but institutionally the EPA is not able to do its work, which is to enforce certain standards. In reality it can undertake little more than public relations activities, which it does well, and some environmental research, for which it has some well-trained and motivated staff. But it has little equipment and almost no budget. An EPA strengthening project sponsored by the World Bank has been delayed so often that staff is demoralized and unable to complete their basic tasks. Indeed, it is questionable whether multilateral loans should be used to strengthen departments that do not generate revenue, although a fully functioning EPA may reduce costs in other areas. In any event, a lack of progress in EPA strengthening weakens considerably the ability of the NWFP to implement the S P C S . Linked to the problem of administrative accountability and the organization of Government is the problem of outdated legislation and legislative gaps, particularly in environmental sectors. There is also a lack of respect for the law among the population in G O V E R N A N C E & C A P A C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T 6 general, a lack of knowledge about existing civil rights, and a problem with enforceability. And there are problems of outright corruption. Law reform is possible, but inculcating a new respect for the law and improving enforceability are more difficult problems that will take time. A tendency to create tough new laws and then use draconian techniques to enforce them has occurred in the past in Pakistan, and it has failed. It will be better to produce laws that balance incentives and partnerships with sanctions and penalties. It is also important to take measures to involve and educate people about the purpose and objectives of the statutes and to provide sufficient time for public awareness programmes to take place. Within the PE&D Department itself, due to inadequate staffing, the work load is overwhelming. There is little opportunity to function more than in a reactive mode to outside demands, with occasional opportunities to promote project-specific ideas related to unique environmental problems. But this is inadequate and does not meet the overall mandate of PE&D Department. The Department should be strengthened so that it can fulfill its strategic planning mandate for the environment sector. This role is not to control but to coordinate the activities for the departments that have environmental mandates. Not the least of these is the mandate to produce, monitor, and update the SPCS on a cyclical basis. Ideally, this mandate will become a legal requirement of the department, but there needs to be formal training in strategic planning—not just for the SPCS, but for situations in which strategic choices are needed among competing courses of action. Related to the strategic planning process for environmental policy and planning is the need for better coordination of relevant agencies in their field activities. Basically, the province needs a legally based system of land use planning and integrated resource management. At present, to the extent that it occurs, land use responsibilities are divided among various departments, depending on what prompted the work. Certainly many of the recent generation of rural development or rehabilitation projects are largely well coordinated, but coverage of the province is quite incomplete. SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY 51

y the inclusion of various environmental screening<br />

and review procedures in the proposed environmental<br />

legislation.<br />

Another related problem is that although the<br />

Government has established the ES in the PE&D<br />

Department and the EPA, significant environmental<br />

and natural resource management responsibilities<br />

are distributed throughout other governmental<br />

departments, most notably Forests, Physical<br />

Planning and Housing (PP&H), and Public Health<br />

Engineering as well as some others. These, too,<br />

need attention. There are discernible problems of<br />

coordination among these departments, partially<br />

due to the inflexibility of their mandates and limited<br />

resources, but also due to the territoriality that<br />

plagues Government worldwide. Thus, it may be<br />

useful to consider a wholesale restructuring of<br />

the environmental mandates of many of these<br />

departments.<br />

The case of the EPA is a special one, because its<br />

mandate comes from Federal Government instructions<br />

that are outdated and from legislation that is<br />

unenforceable, the Environmental Protection<br />

Ordinance 1983. The problem, in legal terms, is<br />

discussed below, but institutionally the EPA is not<br />

able to do its work, which is to enforce certain standards.<br />

In reality it can undertake little more than<br />

public relations activities, which it does well, and<br />

some environmental research, for which it has some<br />

well-trained and motivated staff. But it has little<br />

equipment and almost no budget. An EPA strengthening<br />

project sponsored by the World Bank has<br />

been delayed so often that staff is demoralized and<br />

unable to complete their basic tasks. Indeed, it is<br />

questionable whether multilateral loans should be<br />

used to strengthen departments that do not generate<br />

revenue, although a fully functioning EPA may<br />

reduce costs in other areas. In any event, a lack of<br />

progress in EPA strengthening weakens considerably<br />

the ability of the NWFP to implement the<br />

S P C S .<br />

Linked to the problem of administrative accountability<br />

and the organization of Government is the<br />

problem of outdated legislation and legislative gaps,<br />

particularly in environmental sectors. There is also a<br />

lack of respect for the law among the population in<br />

G O V E R N A N C E & C A P A C I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T 6<br />

general, a lack of knowledge about existing civil<br />

rights, and a problem with enforceability. And there<br />

are problems of outright corruption.<br />

Law reform is possible, but inculcating a new<br />

respect for the law and improving enforceability are<br />

more difficult problems that will take time. A tendency<br />

to create tough new laws and then use draconian<br />

techniques to enforce them has occurred in the<br />

past in Pakistan, and it has failed. It will be better to<br />

produce laws that balance incentives and partnerships<br />

with sanctions and penalties. It is also important<br />

to take measures to involve and educate people<br />

about the purpose and objectives of the statutes and<br />

to provide sufficient time for public awareness programmes<br />

to take place.<br />

Within the PE&D Department itself, due to inadequate<br />

staffing, the work load is overwhelming. There<br />

is little opportunity to function more than in a reactive<br />

mode to outside demands, with occasional opportunities<br />

to promote project-specific ideas related to<br />

unique environmental problems. But this is inadequate<br />

and does not meet the overall mandate of<br />

PE&D Department. The Department should be<br />

strengthened so that it can fulfill its strategic planning<br />

mandate for the environment sector. This role is not to<br />

control but to coordinate the activities for the departments<br />

that have environmental mandates. Not the<br />

least of these is the mandate to produce, monitor,<br />

and update the SPCS on a cyclical basis. Ideally, this<br />

mandate will become a legal requirement of the<br />

department, but there needs to be formal training in<br />

strategic planning—not just for the SPCS, but for situations<br />

in which strategic choices are needed among<br />

competing courses of action.<br />

Related to the strategic planning process for environmental<br />

policy and planning is the need for better<br />

coordination of relevant agencies in their field activities.<br />

Basically, the province needs a legally based<br />

system of land use planning and integrated resource<br />

management. At present, to the extent that it occurs,<br />

land use responsibilities are divided among various<br />

departments, depending on what prompted the work.<br />

Certainly many of the recent generation of rural<br />

development or rehabilitation projects are largely<br />

well coordinated, but coverage of the province is<br />

quite incomplete.<br />

SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!