Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN
Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN
18 A S S E S S I N G P R O G R E S S T O W A R D S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y such a matrix is found in Table 18.2. In this example, a chapter of Agenda 21 was scanned to determine the indicators that are relevant to the issue of ecosystem naturalness/conversion. Aspects of the sample Agenda 21 chapter listed in Table 18.2 may not have a useful indicator, or the indicator may be applicable to a different indicative issue. In any event, the task—once the eight matrices are constructed and the data are collected—is to combine the information first into an index for each of the eight issues and then into a single qualitative assessment of ecosystem and human condition. Then the Barometer of Sustainability can be used. It is this system that the NWFP will test. Further, it will test the approach at the village or city level, in a district conservation strategy (for example, Chitral), and for the entire province. A more detailed description of the model is available from IUCN. It will be difficult to apply such a structured approach at the village level, so a more flexible approach is needed. 234 SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY People need to be involved in the assessment of sustainability. This has already been partially achieved through the first two rounds of public and sectoral consultations. At these meetings there were many suggestions about ‘indicators’—about how to assess ecosystem and human well-being. Hence the people will decide what to measure. This will happen for the overall strategy, but it will be tested even more completely in the district-level strategies, where people are even more well versed in the quality of the environment and their quality of life. Concurrent critique or assessment is also one of the most useful tools to use in programmes such as these. The Participatory Rural Appraisal used during the Kabul River Study provided ‘ground truthing’ for the scientific objectives of the study. In this work, specialists asked, “How has your life along the river changed over the last 20 years?” rather than “How bad is the water?” The technique is to ask for the story first, then the list of problems will emerge from the discussion. Participatory Rural Appraisal is emerg- SAMPLE INDICATORS MATRIX TABLE INDICATIVE ISSUE: ECOSYSTEM NATURALNESS/CONVERSION AGENDA 21 INDICATORS DRIVING FORCE STATE RESPONSE Social Chapter 7: Human Rate of growth & % of population settlements (including urban population (%) in urban areas traffic & transport) Number of megacities Area & population (10 million or more) of settlements (sq km/no) Environmental Chapter 10: Planning & Land use management of land resources Chapter 14: Promoting sustainable Arable land (ha) agriculture & rural development per capita Chapter 11: Combating deforestation Deforestation rate Forest area (sq km) Reforestation (sq km/annum) rate (sq km/annum) Protected forest area as % of total land area 1 8 . 2
ing as a principal tool for sustainability analysis and would be used in assessing the SPCS progress. Some sample sustainability indices emerging from the village-level consultations and from separate meetings with women (conducted by women) and men (conducted by men) are provided below. The list is not complete, and more ideas will emerge from further consultations on the SPCS as well as from the workshop on sustainability expected in the Transition to Implementation phase of the SPCS. This will be organized to discuss the applicability of the IUCN and IDRC model. The initial village level indices included on human well-being: ■ reduction in waterborne diseases; ■ improved, more varied foods; ■ reduction in tribal violence and the availability of weapons; ■ improved methods for saving money; ■ more women in the work force; ■ a reduced birth rate; ■ more respect for the law; ■ reduced exodus to urban areas; ■ a better education; ■ environmental literacy; ■ new environmental laws, with better enforcement; ■ an increase in the development budget; ■ a land taxation system; ■ a measurable electricity grid system; ■ improved soil conservation; and ■ community biodiversity projects. On ecosystem well-being: ■ proper implementation of the Social Action Programme; ■ reforestation of reserved forest area; ■ cleanup of the Kabul River system; ■ recovery of endangered wildlife; ■ a parks and protected areas system; ■ reduced air pollution; ■ reduced fuel adulteration; ■ afforestation and farm forestry programme; ■ increase in the use of cultivable land; and ■ increase in food production. These are not listed in order of priority. But by having people define their own sustainable development priorities, a series of additional consultations A S S E S S I N G P R O G R E S S T O W A R D S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y 18 and workshops and other participatory approaches can later assign priorities, and progress can be measured. This approach does lead to a concern about the comparability of data among villages among officials responsible for monitoring progress in programmes such as the Social Action Programme, but this can be overcome by adding relevant indicators on to the list described by the villages. 1 8 . 3 SPCS: THE NEXT GENERAT I O N In this report, it has been emphasized that this SPCS 1995-98 is the first generation of the strategy—in effect, a ‘snapshot’ of the work in progress in 1995. Some sections are more complete than others, for several reasons. Some sectors have more data available than others, some have more and better trained personnel, and some have more experience and capacity already developed. The lack of balance should be redressed during the 1995-98 period, as the various round tables are established, undertake their work programmes, and begin to demonstrate substantive ownership for their work. This does, however, assume a period of relative political stability, which would allow political leaders to become inevitably familiar with the concept and content of the SPCS. Also, as stated above, the three-year Transition to Implementation phase allows the strengthening of the PE&D Department—work that has been significantly delayed due to the lack of staffing in the section. The SPCS is designed, first and foremost, as a process-oriented, institution-strengthening programme, so there is more work to do in this area, dealing with many structural reforms (such as environmental law reform). Project-specific works, such as the Kabul River research studies, will only proceed as time and resources permit. As a matter of policy and design, the actual implementation of environmental research programmes and action plans must remain with the implementing departments. Ideally, by 1998 most of the round tables will be in relatively similar condition, and physical environmental rehabilitation or related priorities will be under way. This may be optimistic, but the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) has SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY 235
- Page 214 and 215: 184 SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION
- Page 216 and 217: 16 The dynamic and recurrent nature
- Page 218 and 219: 16 the Chief, Environment. This wil
- Page 220 and 221: 16 I N S T I T U T I O N A L P R O
- Page 222 and 223: 16 1 6 . 5 . 2 I N S T I T U T I O
- Page 224 and 225: 16 the NEQS will require engaging t
- Page 226 and 227: 17 1 7 . 1 F I N A N C I N G SPCS,
- Page 228 and 229: 17 For the purpose of the plan, env
- Page 230 and 231: 17 F I N A N C I N G PROJECT COST F
- Page 232 and 233: 17 F I N A N C I N G 202 SARHAD PRO
- Page 234 and 235: 17 F I N A N C I N G 1 7 . 4 . 5 Co
- Page 236 and 237: 17 F I N A N C I N G 206 SARHAD PRO
- Page 238 and 239: 17 F I N A N C I N G 208 SARHAD PRO
- Page 240 and 241: 17 F I N A N C I N G 210 SARHAD PRO
- Page 242 and 243: 17 F I N A N C I N G 212 SARHAD PRO
- Page 244 and 245: 17 F I N A N C I N G 214 SARHAD PRO
- Page 246 and 247: 17 F I N A N C I N G 216 SARHAD PRO
- Page 248 and 249: 17 F I N A N C I N G 218 SARHAD PRO
- Page 250 and 251: 17 F I N A N C I N G 220 SARHAD PRO
- Page 252 and 253: 17 F I N A N C I N G 222 SARHAD PRO
- Page 254 and 255: 17 F I N A N C I N G 224 SARHAD PRO
- Page 256 and 257: 17 F I N A N C I N G 226 SARHAD PRO
- Page 258 and 259: 17 F I N A N C I N G 228 SARHAD PRO
- Page 260 and 261: 230 SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION
- Page 262 and 263: 18 A S S E S S I N G P R O G R E S
- Page 266 and 267: 18 A S S E S S I N G P R O G R E S
- Page 268 and 269: 238 SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION
- Page 270 and 271: 240 SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION
- Page 272 and 273: 242 SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION
- Page 274 and 275: 244 SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION
- Page 276 and 277: B I B L I O G R A P H Y Government
- Page 278: B I B L I O G R A P H Y Sandlund, e
18<br />
A S S E S S I N G P R O G R E S S T O W A R D S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y<br />
such a matrix is found in Table 18.2. In this example,<br />
a chapter of Agenda 21 was scanned to determine<br />
the indicators that are relevant to the issue of ecosystem<br />
naturalness/conversion.<br />
Aspects of the sample Agenda 21 chapter listed<br />
in Table 18.2 may not have a useful indicator, or the<br />
indicator may be applicable to a different indicative<br />
issue. In any event, the task—once the eight matrices<br />
are constructed and the data are collected—is to<br />
combine the information first into an index for each<br />
of the eight issues and then into a single qualitative<br />
assessment of ecosystem and human condition. Then<br />
the Barometer of Sustainability can be used.<br />
It is this system that the NWFP will test. Further, it<br />
will test the approach at the village or city level, in a<br />
district conservation strategy (for example, Chitral),<br />
and for the entire province. A more detailed description<br />
of the model is available from <strong>IUCN</strong>.<br />
It will be difficult to apply such a structured<br />
approach at the village level, so a more flexible<br />
approach is needed.<br />
234 SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY<br />
People need to be involved in the assessment of<br />
sustainability. This has already been partially<br />
achieved through the first two rounds of public and<br />
sectoral consultations. At these meetings there were<br />
many suggestions about ‘indicators’—about how to<br />
assess ecosystem and human well-being. Hence the<br />
people will decide what to measure. This will happen<br />
for the overall strategy, but it will be tested even more<br />
completely in the district-level strategies, where people<br />
are even more well versed in the quality of the<br />
environment and their quality of life.<br />
Concurrent critique or assessment is also one of<br />
the most useful tools to use in programmes such as<br />
these. The Participatory Rural Appraisal used during<br />
the Kabul River Study provided ‘ground truthing’ for<br />
the scientific objectives of the study. In this work, specialists<br />
asked, “How has your life along the river<br />
changed over the last 20 years?” rather than “How<br />
bad is the water?” The technique is to ask for the<br />
story first, then the list of problems will emerge from<br />
the discussion. Participatory Rural Appraisal is emerg-<br />
SAMPLE INDICATORS MATRIX TABLE<br />
INDICATIVE ISSUE: ECOSYSTEM NATURALNESS/CONVERSION<br />
AGENDA 21 INDICATORS<br />
DRIVING FORCE STATE RESPONSE<br />
Social<br />
Chapter 7: Human Rate of growth & % of population<br />
settlements (including urban population (%) in urban areas<br />
traffic & transport)<br />
Number of megacities Area & population<br />
(10 million or more) of settlements<br />
(sq km/no)<br />
Environmental<br />
Chapter 10: Planning & Land use<br />
management of land resources<br />
Chapter 14: Promoting sustainable Arable land (ha)<br />
agriculture & rural development per capita<br />
Chapter 11: Combating deforestation Deforestation rate Forest area (sq km) Reforestation<br />
(sq km/annum) rate (sq km/annum)<br />
Protected forest<br />
area as % of total<br />
land area<br />
1 8 . 2