07.07.2013 Views

Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18<br />

A S S E S S I N G P R O G R E S S T O W A R D S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y<br />

It is possible to confuse the process of monitoring<br />

the implementation of the <strong>Sarhad</strong> <strong>Provincial</strong><br />

<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> with the process of achieving<br />

sustainability. Implementation does not necessarily<br />

mean having the desired effect. It is essential that<br />

basic mechanisms be established to monitor each<br />

objective in each priority area. Hence an implementation<br />

plan will be established for each. The plans<br />

will include objectives, sub-objectives, outputs, activities,<br />

and results.<br />

These work plans then become the principal management<br />

tools, not only to report results on a sixmonthly<br />

basis, but to allow more frequent monitoring,<br />

concurrent critiques, a reassessment of priorities, and<br />

inevitable crisis management. They can also serve as<br />

the basis for employees evaluation, budget control,<br />

and ultimately the design of the subsequent versions<br />

of the SPCS.<br />

The work plan for SPCS 1995-98 will be developed<br />

while the strategy itself is being designed, printed,<br />

and published during 1996.<br />

1 8 . 1<br />

FEEDBACK MECHANISMS<br />

Several useful mechanisms exist to monitor the strategy<br />

and to assess progress towards achieving sustainability.<br />

Copies of the regular monitoring reports<br />

prepared by field projects for submission to<br />

Government and donors two to four times a year<br />

will be obtained and analyzed in the Planning,<br />

Environment and Development (PE&D) Department.<br />

Second, the focal points in key sectors, which will<br />

be networked with the PE&D Department, will provide<br />

monitoring information for their respective sectors. This<br />

will be essentially qualitative information, especially<br />

with respect to those aspects of the SPCS that are not<br />

translated into field projects. These include legislation,<br />

policy development, and capacity building.<br />

Third, the PE&D Department will commission its<br />

own periodic surveys to gather quantitative and qualitative<br />

information about the efficiency and relevance<br />

of the recommended actions and about the progress<br />

towards sustainable development.<br />

This information will be pooled and analyzed in<br />

the PE&D Department. To this end, monitoring capac-<br />

232 SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY<br />

ity will be created in the Department both in terms of<br />

quality personnel and fiscal resources. The monitoring<br />

data will be collected and translated into proposals<br />

for adjustment in the strategic planning and the<br />

approach to implementation. The Executive<br />

Committee for the <strong>Provincial</strong> Environment Protection<br />

Council will consider and approve the proposals as<br />

necessary.<br />

1 8 . 2<br />

ACHIEVING SUSTA I N A B I L I T Y<br />

<strong>IUCN</strong> has defined a strategy as “an evolutionary<br />

process, developing as it goes along adapting to<br />

change. It is also recycled, its main components—<br />

constituency building, agenda building, design implementation,<br />

assessment—being repeated as it develops”<br />

(<strong>IUCN</strong>, 1994).<br />

With support from the International Development<br />

Research Centre (IDRC) and the Canadian<br />

International Development Agency (CIDA), <strong>IUCN</strong><br />

has been considering how to assess progress<br />

towards sustainability. Although it is work in<br />

progress, it does provide a conceptual basis for<br />

looking at sustainability.<br />

Human well-being and ecosystem well-being are<br />

equally important, because people are an integral<br />

part of the ecosystem and the well-being of one is<br />

bound up in the well-being of the other. Sustainable<br />

well-being is the combination of human and ecosystem<br />

well-being. A society is sustainable only if both<br />

the human condition and the condition of the ecosystem<br />

are satisfactory or improving. If either is unsatisfactory<br />

or worsening, the society is unsustainable<br />

(<strong>IUCN</strong>, 1994).<br />

The ‘barometer’ of sustainability proposed by<br />

<strong>IUCN</strong> and IDRC produces a single word index of<br />

progress rather than an elaborate numerical scheme<br />

that requires large amounts of information to be collected.<br />

This is a particularly useful concept for the<br />

North West Frontier Province, where many basic<br />

data are not available and where resource limitations<br />

prevent certain kinds of information from being collected.<br />

Table 18.1 presents the potential qualitative<br />

results from an assessment of ecosystem condition<br />

and human condition.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!