Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN
Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN
Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
F I N A N C I N G 17<br />
RECURRENT COSTS OF THE SPCS TABLE<br />
WORK BUDGET<br />
(million rupees)<br />
Environment Section, Planning, Environment & Development Department 5<br />
NWFP Environmental Protection Agency 10<br />
Fund for Sustainable Development 20<br />
Focal Points & Round Tables 5<br />
Total 40<br />
These are broad estimates & the actual requirements may vary around them.<br />
restricted to conservation of forests and wildlife.<br />
Instead, it subsumes those sectoral programmes such<br />
as the SAP, and others that address the fundamental<br />
causes of environmental impoverishment.<br />
Consequently, while they carry several new recommendations<br />
with far-reaching impacts, both the SPCS<br />
and the action plan are built on the many existing<br />
new initiatives. The purpose is to consolidate the present<br />
achievements and make future developments<br />
more sustainable.<br />
The arrangement of major themes follows the relative<br />
priorities assigned to them by the people of the<br />
NWFP. For example, governance and capacity building<br />
is a first major priority, while cultural heritage is a<br />
lower priority. This does not mean that the cultural<br />
heritage component will be implemented only after<br />
all others have been implemented. In fact, simultaneous<br />
action in all the component strategies is necessary.<br />
However, it does mean that if there were only<br />
one new rupee available for the SPCS, it would be<br />
invested in governance and capacity building before<br />
anything else.<br />
By the same measure, the order of the commitments<br />
in the component strategies indicates the relative<br />
priority proposed for the different components in<br />
the respective themes. The trade-offs in different priorities<br />
are manifested in the allocation of local<br />
resources proposed for different commitments. The<br />
1 7 . 5<br />
actions that must be undertaken, regardless of the<br />
availability of donor support, have been allocated<br />
relatively more local funds (especially in the shortterm)<br />
than those whose implementation depends on<br />
and can await donor support.<br />
The local and donor resources already available,<br />
or more likely to be available, have been underlined.<br />
The assessment of the available resources is<br />
based on the demonstrated or indicated interest of<br />
the Government and the donors in certain programmes.<br />
The resource requirements are largely<br />
indicative. The cost of the commitments that have<br />
already been conceptualized or had projects developed<br />
on them are relatively more accurate; these<br />
have been boxed.<br />
The prioritization of different themes is based on<br />
input from the public consultation process.<br />
Consideration has also been given to the international<br />
obligations of Pakistan under different treaties<br />
and conventions. Institutions indicated in the implementation<br />
responsibility column would in fact be the<br />
lead institutions. They should not be regarded as the<br />
sole institution responsible for implementation.<br />
Implementation of many commitments would<br />
require a multi-disciplinary approach; in some,<br />
involvement of the private sector will be crucial, and<br />
almost all would entail partnerships with NGOs and<br />
c o m m u n i t i e s .<br />
SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY 205