07.07.2013 Views

Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13<br />

B I O L O G I C A L D I V E R S I T Y , P A R K S & P R O T E C T E D A R E A S<br />

CONVENTIONAL PARK BOX<br />

MANAGEMENT PLANNING<br />

PROCESSES<br />

■ Inventory the resources being protected.<br />

■ Identify management issues and problems.<br />

■ Set objectives and respond to issues.<br />

■ Quantify outputs from the individual activities.<br />

■ Set priorities.<br />

■ Allocate resources.<br />

■ Establish monitoring and evaluation mechanisms.<br />

Source Distilled from Mackinnon et al. 1986, Stankey et al. 1990, Lucas<br />

1992, and others.<br />

■ a set of proposed changes and a vision for the<br />

future;<br />

■ an implementation plan;<br />

■ human and financial resource analysis; and<br />

■ a system for reviewing and monitoring progress.<br />

A detailed implementation or work plan will be a<br />

critical component, providing important guidance in<br />

day-to-day activities of the management staff.<br />

Most parks and protected areas agencies, when<br />

setting out on new programmes now emphasize public<br />

involvement in all phases. Although it has not<br />

always been so, it is now widely acknowledged that<br />

the quality of the process ultimately affects the quantity<br />

and public acceptability of the management plan.<br />

Time spent ensuring that every group or community<br />

with an interest in the protected area is involved in<br />

the process pays considerable dividends.<br />

The difficulty with all but the most recent generation<br />

of management plans is that they focus on<br />

ecosystem diversity, with some protection of species<br />

biodiversity, but virtually ignoring genetic-diversity<br />

within a species. With the large protected areas this<br />

is less of a problem, but many systems—particularly<br />

in small countries—do not create parks large<br />

enough to protect species diversity. This has been<br />

particularly true for large carnivores at the top of<br />

the food chain, which require vast areas in order to<br />

survive. It will be very important that at least some<br />

of the new national parks are large enough to protect<br />

all of the biodiversity of an ecosystem. A substantial<br />

increase in protected areas from the present<br />

6.14% of the NWFP will be required for this<br />

p u r p o s e .<br />

162 SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY<br />

1 3 . 2<br />

The park systems plan allows more flexibility in<br />

management of protected areas, and does not<br />

demand that all human activities cease in all the area<br />

that needs some degree of protection. In fact, some<br />

human presence is often desirable in protected areas,<br />

because once agreement is reached concerning management<br />

objectives, local residents are often the most<br />

likely adherents to the overall cause.<br />

Depending on the resource use conflicts and the<br />

nature of management agencies involved, a complex<br />

set of environmental, economic, and cultural circumstances<br />

will almost inevitably lead to a more complex<br />

process and a more complex plan. It will also result<br />

in a more time-consuming process as well.<br />

1 3 . 3 . 4<br />

Innovation in Parks & Protected Area<br />

Planning & Co-Management<br />

The conventional technocratic methods for planning<br />

parks and protected areas outlined in Box 13.2 do<br />

not themselves necessarily lead to the protection of<br />

biodiversity. These apply almost universally, irrespective<br />

of the protected area objectives—be it biodiversity,<br />

ecotourism, or protection of a unique monument.<br />

A number of other steps should be taken, however, in<br />

the spirit of the co-management approach and<br />

<strong>IUCN</strong>’s guidelines for the co-management of the protected<br />

areas, as described in Box 13.3.<br />

First, the planning activities should be undertaken<br />

in the context of a district-level sustainable development<br />

(or conservation) strategy. In an ecosystem management<br />

approach, the national park would be a<br />

large component, but it would be integrated into a<br />

broader land use or integrated resource management<br />

scheme. This would broaden the mandate, take more<br />

time, and cost more money, but the end result may be<br />

more beneficial, to a greater range of beneficiaries.<br />

Second, a Sustainable Development Round Table<br />

should be formed in the project area, to function as a<br />

Steering Committee for the whole programme. Such a<br />

body should define its own priorities within a more general<br />

mandate. After this has been accomplished, with<br />

some secretariat assistance, the Round Table would<br />

hire the technical team needed to meet these priorities<br />

and to undertake the technical park planning functions,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!