Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN
Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN
Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
13<br />
B I O L O G I C A L D I V E R S I T Y , P A R K S & P R O T E C T E D A R E A S<br />
CONVENTIONAL PARK BOX<br />
MANAGEMENT PLANNING<br />
PROCESSES<br />
■ Inventory the resources being protected.<br />
■ Identify management issues and problems.<br />
■ Set objectives and respond to issues.<br />
■ Quantify outputs from the individual activities.<br />
■ Set priorities.<br />
■ Allocate resources.<br />
■ Establish monitoring and evaluation mechanisms.<br />
Source Distilled from Mackinnon et al. 1986, Stankey et al. 1990, Lucas<br />
1992, and others.<br />
■ a set of proposed changes and a vision for the<br />
future;<br />
■ an implementation plan;<br />
■ human and financial resource analysis; and<br />
■ a system for reviewing and monitoring progress.<br />
A detailed implementation or work plan will be a<br />
critical component, providing important guidance in<br />
day-to-day activities of the management staff.<br />
Most parks and protected areas agencies, when<br />
setting out on new programmes now emphasize public<br />
involvement in all phases. Although it has not<br />
always been so, it is now widely acknowledged that<br />
the quality of the process ultimately affects the quantity<br />
and public acceptability of the management plan.<br />
Time spent ensuring that every group or community<br />
with an interest in the protected area is involved in<br />
the process pays considerable dividends.<br />
The difficulty with all but the most recent generation<br />
of management plans is that they focus on<br />
ecosystem diversity, with some protection of species<br />
biodiversity, but virtually ignoring genetic-diversity<br />
within a species. With the large protected areas this<br />
is less of a problem, but many systems—particularly<br />
in small countries—do not create parks large<br />
enough to protect species diversity. This has been<br />
particularly true for large carnivores at the top of<br />
the food chain, which require vast areas in order to<br />
survive. It will be very important that at least some<br />
of the new national parks are large enough to protect<br />
all of the biodiversity of an ecosystem. A substantial<br />
increase in protected areas from the present<br />
6.14% of the NWFP will be required for this<br />
p u r p o s e .<br />
162 SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY<br />
1 3 . 2<br />
The park systems plan allows more flexibility in<br />
management of protected areas, and does not<br />
demand that all human activities cease in all the area<br />
that needs some degree of protection. In fact, some<br />
human presence is often desirable in protected areas,<br />
because once agreement is reached concerning management<br />
objectives, local residents are often the most<br />
likely adherents to the overall cause.<br />
Depending on the resource use conflicts and the<br />
nature of management agencies involved, a complex<br />
set of environmental, economic, and cultural circumstances<br />
will almost inevitably lead to a more complex<br />
process and a more complex plan. It will also result<br />
in a more time-consuming process as well.<br />
1 3 . 3 . 4<br />
Innovation in Parks & Protected Area<br />
Planning & Co-Management<br />
The conventional technocratic methods for planning<br />
parks and protected areas outlined in Box 13.2 do<br />
not themselves necessarily lead to the protection of<br />
biodiversity. These apply almost universally, irrespective<br />
of the protected area objectives—be it biodiversity,<br />
ecotourism, or protection of a unique monument.<br />
A number of other steps should be taken, however, in<br />
the spirit of the co-management approach and<br />
<strong>IUCN</strong>’s guidelines for the co-management of the protected<br />
areas, as described in Box 13.3.<br />
First, the planning activities should be undertaken<br />
in the context of a district-level sustainable development<br />
(or conservation) strategy. In an ecosystem management<br />
approach, the national park would be a<br />
large component, but it would be integrated into a<br />
broader land use or integrated resource management<br />
scheme. This would broaden the mandate, take more<br />
time, and cost more money, but the end result may be<br />
more beneficial, to a greater range of beneficiaries.<br />
Second, a Sustainable Development Round Table<br />
should be formed in the project area, to function as a<br />
Steering Committee for the whole programme. Such a<br />
body should define its own priorities within a more general<br />
mandate. After this has been accomplished, with<br />
some secretariat assistance, the Round Table would<br />
hire the technical team needed to meet these priorities<br />
and to undertake the technical park planning functions,