Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy - IUCN

cmsdata.iucn.org
from cmsdata.iucn.org More from this publisher
07.07.2013 Views

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y mitment by the government and people of the NWFP to move forward with an effective programme of sustainable development. The SPCS is the principal plan for implementing the National Conservation Strategy in the NWFP. It is both a comprehensive statement of provincial aspirations for sustainable development and a commitment package containing major policy statements, lawreform initiatives, structural improvements and bold new programmes. With its strong emphasis on changing the administration’s operating style, the SPCS will open up government priority-setting to the people in an unprecedented manner. The SPCS 1995-98 is the first generation of the strategy which, by design, is innovative, exploratory and time-specific. It will be reviewed in 1998 to coincide with the launch of the Ninth Five-Year Plan for Pakistan. By then there will be a far better understanding of the actual efficacy of many of the SPCS processes, systems and policies. It is also likely that certain priorities will have changed, and portions of it may well have become outdated—some would have been implemented while others may be judged unviable. In a sense then, while the SPCS 1995-98 reflects today’s priorities and is as complete as currently possible, it remains a flexible, evolving plan to achieve sustainable development in the NWFP. In this regard, the SPCS is subject to a legal requirement, set out by the proposed NWFP Environment Act, that the strategy is reviewed and rewritten every five years. This will be done by the Planning, Environment and Development Department of the Government of NWFP, in conjunction with other departments involved in the implementation of the Strategy. The neglect and abuse of the environment over past decades has come to pose a formidable challenge, and the large number of complex problems cannot be addressed in a short period of time. This is partly because the NWFP is a resource-deficient province, and donors are unlikely to fund all that must be done. The SPCS has, therefore, adopted a prioritized agenda for implementation, in which it concentrates initially on activities which can bring about the greatest improvements for the smallest i n v e s t m e n t s . xii SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY 2 WHAT THE SPCS IS ALL ABOUT The Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy aims to secure the economic, social and ecological wellbeing of the people of the NWFP through the conservation and sustainable development of the province’s natural resources. Its specific objectives are: ■ treatment of the fundamental social problems that are the underlying cause of environmental degradation; ■ conservation, rehabilitation, and sustainable development of natural resources such as forests, water, soil and wildlife; ■ protection of the living environment from air, water and soil pollution; ■ development of high-quality environmental protection mechanisms including appropriate legislation, development planning mechanisms, environmental quality standards, and participatory and regulatory institutional arrangements; ■ improvement of the institutional and financial capacity of the NWFP Government to achieve sustainable development of the province’s natural resources; ■ protection and conservation of the cultural heritage of the NWFP; ■ improvement of community and individual involvement in decision making about natural resources and the environment; and ■ raising of public awareness and understanding of conservation and sustainable development. These objectives have been formulated using the following guiding principles: ■ conservation and sustainable development of the NWFP’s resources are essential to human wellbeing; ■ essential ecological processes and life-support systems must be maintained; ■ genetic and biological diversity of plants, animals and ecosystems must be conserved and promoted; ■ economic development and environmental management must be undertaken together; ■ community development organizations and the private sector, are indispensable to finding practi-

cable solutions to the problems of sustainable development; ■ religious and cultural values must be respected and used as a resource in the design and implementation of the SPCS; ■ each individual citizen has a responsibility to the environment and can play a positive role in conservation; and ■ the NWFP has a role to play in national and international efforts to ensure that sustainable development is effectively implemented and that global environmental problems are solved. The SPCS has identified certain priority areas for action. These include governance and capacity development, poverty alleviation and population, community participation, communication and education, urban environments and sustainable cities, sustainable industrial development, natural resouces management, biodiversity conservation and cultural heritage and sustainable tourism. In addition to the priority areas this summary also presents the short-term (three-year) commitments of the SPCS. 3 TOWARDS IMPROVED GOVERNANCE At the core of the Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategy lies a set of structural reforms needed to improve the quality of governance in the province and to strengthen the ability of various agencies to operate in a manner which promotes sustainable development. These improvements address a number of problems that currently impede the government’s efficiency. Many of these are remnants of the colonial legacy of South Asia. A major effort is needed to affect change. A number of these ideas came from people at the district public meetings and from Government officials. Some of these individuals had never heard the term ‘sustainable development’. But they implicitly knew what it meant, and that it was not being achieved. They wished to see a mandate for change adopted by the Government. That would include: ■ potential reorganization of the Government’s environmental responsibilities; strengthening of the E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y Planning, Environment and Development Department and the Environmental Protection Agency; ■ policy and programme reform; ■ law reform; ■ privatization, incentives and partnership; ■ strategic planning processes; ■ environmental planning processes; ■ environmental impact assessment processes; ■ state of environment reporting; ■ environmental research; and ■ other institution-strengthening initiatives. One fundamental problem is a generally acknowledged difficulty with administrative accountability. The Rules of Business that define the organization of Government and departmental responsibilities are outdated and inflexible. The institutional structure in Government is highly bureaucratic, and individuals are trained to adhere strictly to these procedures. Combined with the generally low rates of remuneration, there is little incentive for flexibility or creativity. Training in newly emerging fields, particularly multidisciplinary ones such as environmental management, is weak. Although the NWFP Government has set up the Environment Section in the Planning, Environment and Development (PE&D) Department, as well as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), significant environmental and natural resource management responsibilities are distributed among other government departments such as Forests, Physical Planning and Housing, Public Health Engineering and some others. These, too, need attention. There are problems of coordination amongst these departments partly due to the inflexibility of their respective mandates and very limited financial resources. The case of the EPA is a special one because its mandate comes from Federal Government instructions that are outdated and from an unenforceable piece of legislation, the Environmental Protection Ordinance, 1983. Hence the EPA is not able to do its primary work, that of enforcing certain standards. It can do little more than public relations exercises, which it does well, and some environmental research. But the EPA has little equipment, few people and almost no budget. SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY xiii

cable solutions to the problems of sustainable<br />

development;<br />

■ religious and cultural values must be respected<br />

and used as a resource in the design and implementation<br />

of the SPCS;<br />

■ each individual citizen has a responsibility to the<br />

environment and can play a positive role in conservation;<br />

and<br />

■ the NWFP has a role to play in national and international<br />

efforts to ensure that sustainable development<br />

is effectively implemented and that global<br />

environmental problems are solved.<br />

The SPCS has identified certain priority areas for<br />

action. These include governance and capacity<br />

development, poverty alleviation and population,<br />

community participation, communication and education,<br />

urban environments and sustainable cities, sustainable<br />

industrial development, natural resouces<br />

management, biodiversity conservation and cultural<br />

heritage and sustainable tourism.<br />

In addition to the priority areas this summary also<br />

presents the short-term (three-year) commitments of the<br />

SPCS.<br />

3<br />

TOWARDS IMPROVED GOVERNANCE<br />

At the core of the <strong>Sarhad</strong> <strong>Provincial</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong><br />

<strong>Strategy</strong> lies a set of structural reforms needed to<br />

improve the quality of governance in the province<br />

and to strengthen the ability of various agencies to<br />

operate in a manner which promotes sustainable<br />

development. These improvements address a number<br />

of problems that currently impede the government’s<br />

efficiency. Many of these are remnants of the colonial<br />

legacy of South Asia. A major effort is needed to<br />

affect change.<br />

A number of these ideas came from people at the<br />

district public meetings and from Government officials.<br />

Some of these individuals had never heard the<br />

term ‘sustainable development’. But they implicitly<br />

knew what it meant, and that it was not being<br />

achieved. They wished to see a mandate for change<br />

adopted by the Government. That would include:<br />

■ potential reorganization of the Government’s environmental<br />

responsibilities; strengthening of the<br />

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y<br />

Planning, Environment and Development<br />

Department and the Environmental Protection<br />

Agency;<br />

■ policy and programme reform;<br />

■ law reform;<br />

■ privatization, incentives and partnership;<br />

■ strategic planning processes;<br />

■ environmental planning processes;<br />

■ environmental impact assessment processes;<br />

■ state of environment reporting;<br />

■ environmental research; and<br />

■ other institution-strengthening initiatives.<br />

One fundamental problem is a generally acknowledged<br />

difficulty with administrative accountability.<br />

The Rules of Business that define the organization of<br />

Government and departmental responsibilities are<br />

outdated and inflexible. The institutional structure in<br />

Government is highly bureaucratic, and individuals<br />

are trained to adhere strictly to these procedures.<br />

Combined with the generally low rates of remuneration,<br />

there is little incentive for flexibility or creativity.<br />

Training in newly emerging fields, particularly multidisciplinary<br />

ones such as environmental management,<br />

is weak.<br />

Although the NWFP Government has set up the<br />

Environment Section in the Planning, Environment<br />

and Development (PE&D) Department, as well as the<br />

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), significant<br />

environmental and natural resource management<br />

responsibilities are distributed among other government<br />

departments such as Forests, Physical Planning<br />

and Housing, Public Health Engineering and some<br />

others. These, too, need attention. There are problems<br />

of coordination amongst these departments partly<br />

due to the inflexibility of their respective mandates<br />

and very limited financial resources.<br />

The case of the EPA is a special one because its<br />

mandate comes from Federal Government instructions<br />

that are outdated and from an unenforceable piece<br />

of legislation, the Environmental Protection<br />

Ordinance, 1983. Hence the EPA is not able to do<br />

its primary work, that of enforcing certain standards.<br />

It can do little more than public relations exercises,<br />

which it does well, and some environmental research.<br />

But the EPA has little equipment, few people and<br />

almost no budget.<br />

SARHAD PROVINCIAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY xiii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!