Complaint 4 26 13 Final - OakBridge Insurance Services
Complaint 4 26 13 Final - OakBridge Insurance Services
Complaint 4 26 13 Final - OakBridge Insurance Services
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Case 3:<strong>13</strong>-cv-0<strong>13</strong>28-CCC Document 1 Filed 04/<strong>26</strong>/<strong>13</strong> Page <strong>13</strong> of 31<br />
36. The indiscriminate use of interest reserves funded by loan proceeds for certain of<br />
the Loss Loans gave the false appearance to stockholders and regulators that the loans were<br />
performing and the Bank was making income from these loans when, in fact, the funds were<br />
simply recycled within the Bank. Generally, the borrowers had little or no equity in the project.<br />
The risk with these transactions was borne almost entirely by the Bank and, as noted, came at a<br />
time when the economic environment should have inspired the Director Defendants to exercise<br />
greater caution in subjecting the Bank to credit risk. The Loss Loans are summarized below.<br />
Skylofts<br />
37. On February 27, 2006, the Director Defendants approved a $4.3 million loan to<br />
Skylofts, Inc. to assist in the acquisition and development of land in Miramar, San Juan, PR, for<br />
the Skylofts project, a 120-unit residential complex. The source of repayment was to be the<br />
proceeds of an interim loan that would be procured at a later date for the construction of the<br />
units. There was no commitment for a construction loan on file in violation of the Loan Policy.<br />
There was no evidence that the Bank inquired or had discussion with the principals regarding<br />
their ability to obtain such financing. The secondary source of repayment was identified as the<br />
sale of the property or from the guarantors’ own resources.<br />
38. The loan was secured by 1,782 square meters at the development site and<br />
supported by the personal guarantees of Francisco Pujol, Zoila Levis and Caridad Fernandez.<br />
Complete and current financial statements and tax returns were not provided for each guarantor<br />
in violation of the Bank’s Policy. Despite the lack of complete financial information, the<br />
guarantors were evaluated based on their net worth rather than their capacity to repay the loan in<br />
the event of default. Their real estate holdings constituted the majority of their assets and net<br />
worth, yet there was no analysis or verification of these holdings. There were no credit reports<br />
on file for the guarantors. As Skylofts, Inc. was a recently-formed corporation, there were no<br />
<strong>13</strong>