06.07.2013 Views

Complaint 4 26 13 Final - OakBridge Insurance Services

Complaint 4 26 13 Final - OakBridge Insurance Services

Complaint 4 26 13 Final - OakBridge Insurance Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case 3:<strong>13</strong>-cv-0<strong>13</strong>28-CCC Document 1 Filed 04/<strong>26</strong>/<strong>13</strong> Page <strong>13</strong> of 31<br />

36. The indiscriminate use of interest reserves funded by loan proceeds for certain of<br />

the Loss Loans gave the false appearance to stockholders and regulators that the loans were<br />

performing and the Bank was making income from these loans when, in fact, the funds were<br />

simply recycled within the Bank. Generally, the borrowers had little or no equity in the project.<br />

The risk with these transactions was borne almost entirely by the Bank and, as noted, came at a<br />

time when the economic environment should have inspired the Director Defendants to exercise<br />

greater caution in subjecting the Bank to credit risk. The Loss Loans are summarized below.<br />

Skylofts<br />

37. On February 27, 2006, the Director Defendants approved a $4.3 million loan to<br />

Skylofts, Inc. to assist in the acquisition and development of land in Miramar, San Juan, PR, for<br />

the Skylofts project, a 120-unit residential complex. The source of repayment was to be the<br />

proceeds of an interim loan that would be procured at a later date for the construction of the<br />

units. There was no commitment for a construction loan on file in violation of the Loan Policy.<br />

There was no evidence that the Bank inquired or had discussion with the principals regarding<br />

their ability to obtain such financing. The secondary source of repayment was identified as the<br />

sale of the property or from the guarantors’ own resources.<br />

38. The loan was secured by 1,782 square meters at the development site and<br />

supported by the personal guarantees of Francisco Pujol, Zoila Levis and Caridad Fernandez.<br />

Complete and current financial statements and tax returns were not provided for each guarantor<br />

in violation of the Bank’s Policy. Despite the lack of complete financial information, the<br />

guarantors were evaluated based on their net worth rather than their capacity to repay the loan in<br />

the event of default. Their real estate holdings constituted the majority of their assets and net<br />

worth, yet there was no analysis or verification of these holdings. There were no credit reports<br />

on file for the guarantors. As Skylofts, Inc. was a recently-formed corporation, there were no<br />

<strong>13</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!