06.07.2013 Views

Logical Decisions - Classweb

Logical Decisions - Classweb

Logical Decisions - Classweb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the task of evaluating potential reservoir locations and making a<br />

recommendation to the district's board of directors. The team<br />

used an initial screening process to identify a set of potential sites<br />

for evaluation. They used LDW to help develop a quantitative<br />

ranking in support of their more qualitative recommendations.<br />

The team included the ranking results as part of the alternatives<br />

analysis for the project's environmental impact assessment<br />

documents. The reservoir selection example is included in the file<br />

RESEX.LDW.<br />

The reservoir ranking differs from the previous examples in that<br />

the ranking represents the consensus of a team of experts, rather<br />

than the preferences of an individual. The project team used the<br />

LDW preference assessment process as a structured forum where<br />

they could discuss the relative importances of different aspects of<br />

the project. These discussions allowed the project team to arrive<br />

at a consensus preference set and thus a consensus overall<br />

ranking of the alternatives. This ranking also helped the project<br />

team formulate and organize their qualitative recommendations.<br />

The team used sensitivity analyses extensively to identify the<br />

effects of changes in the measures' relative importances.<br />

Six reservoir sites were selected for evaluation. Some alternatives<br />

were enlargements to existing reservoirs, while others were<br />

entirely new sites. Several sites could fit more than one size of<br />

reservoir, but with differing impacts and operational effects. The<br />

team developed multiple alternatives with differing reservoir<br />

sizes at these sites. The sites were ranked independently of size,<br />

with costs being measured on a dollars per acre foot basis. (An<br />

acre foot is a measure of water volume and thus reservoir<br />

capacity.) A separate analysis used the ranking results to select<br />

the recommended reservoir size.<br />

The team developed the goals hierarchy together with the<br />

technical experts and consultants working on the project. To<br />

identify the measures and lower level sub-goals for each major<br />

sub-goal, the team held a meeting with the experts in that area.<br />

These meetings helped ensure that the proper data was collected<br />

for each site and that the data was collected uniformly. Figure 10-<br />

9 shows the goals hierarchy for the reservoir selection process.<br />

Section 10 -- Examples 10-13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!