06.07.2013 Views

Logical Decisions - Classweb

Logical Decisions - Classweb

Logical Decisions - Classweb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 9-8 shows how a tradeoff can be used to compute the<br />

relative importance of two measures. In box 1, the decision maker<br />

is asked to choose which alternative is preferred: a car having 110<br />

hp and costing $7,000 or a car having 180 hp and costing $12,000.<br />

In box 2, the decision maker replies that she prefers the two<br />

alternatives equally.<br />

Since she prefers the alternatives equally, they should have equal<br />

utilities. Since a MUF is (usually) a weighted average of the<br />

utilities of the active members, this means that the two weighted<br />

averages must be equal. When comparing the weighted average<br />

for the two simplified alternatives, we see that the terms for the<br />

members other than the ones in the tradeoff drop out. This is<br />

because the levels on all members not explicitly mentioned in the<br />

tradeoff are assumed to be equal.<br />

Thus, the weight for horsepower times the utility for horsepower<br />

plus the weight for cost times the utility for cost must be equal for<br />

the two alternatives in the tradeoff. This implies in turn that the<br />

change in utility for horsepower times the weight for horsepower<br />

must equal the change in utility for cost times the weight for cost.<br />

The two changes must just compensate for each other in order for<br />

the alternatives to have equal overall utilities. This is shown in<br />

box 3. In box 4, we use the previously assessed SUFs to identify<br />

the change in utility for horsepower and cost for the two<br />

alternatives.<br />

In box 5, we see that the change in utility for horsepower is only<br />

half the change for cost. Thus, the weight for horsepower must be<br />

twice the weight for cost. The mathematics of this process are<br />

described in the Appendix on page A-1.<br />

Establishing Tradeoffs. All of the computations needed to<br />

convert tradeoffs to relative weights are done automatically by<br />

LDW. The only thing the decision maker has to do is establish the<br />

tradeoff pairs of equally preferred alternatives.<br />

Typically, tradeoffs are assessed with the help of a graph that has<br />

one member on the horizontal axis and of the other on the vertical<br />

axis. Each point on the graph represents a possible alternative.<br />

These simplified alternatives are assumed to have identical levels<br />

on all of the other evaluation measures and goals.<br />

In the tradeoff assessment process, LDW highlights two points on<br />

the graph and asks the decision maker which she prefers. Based<br />

9-44 Section 9 -- In Depth

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!