06.07.2013 Views

Logical Decisions - Classweb

Logical Decisions - Classweb

Logical Decisions - Classweb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

decision maker to state importance as a percentage of the first<br />

member's one hundred point swing weight. If the decision maker<br />

thought that swinging a member was half as important as<br />

swinging the first member she would give it a swing weight of<br />

fifty.<br />

You can continue in this way until the decision maker has<br />

assigned a swing weight to all of the members.<br />

The idea of the relative importances of swinging members<br />

through their ranges is rather abstract. However, studies and<br />

experience have shown that decision makers are willing to<br />

provide this information and often feel very comfortable doing so.<br />

To compute the absolute weights for the members from their<br />

swing weights, LDW simply adjusts the swing weights so they<br />

sum to one.<br />

The other two importance ratio methods -- pairwise weight ratios<br />

and the analytic hierarchy process -- ask the decision maker to<br />

specify ratios between pairs of members.<br />

In the pairwise weight ratios method, LDW helps you identify<br />

pairs of members for which to define weight ratios. When you<br />

have entered enough ratios to define a complete set of weights,<br />

the process is complete.<br />

To compute a complete set of weights, you must define ratios that<br />

include each active member at least once. This means that if there<br />

are n active members, you need to enter n - 1 ratios. LDW uses<br />

this information and any information on interactions to compute<br />

the absolute weight for each active member.<br />

The Analytic Hierarchy Process is like the pairwise weight ratios<br />

method. However, instead of entering ratios for selected pairs of<br />

members, you enter ratios for all possible pairs. This means that if<br />

there are n active members, you need to enter n*(n - 1)/2<br />

importance ratios. Since this is more than the minimum needed<br />

to compute the weights (n - 1), there may be inconsistencies in<br />

your answers. See page 9-30 for a discussion of the consistency<br />

measures used in the AHP method.<br />

The weight for each active member is computed using a matrix<br />

algebra approach that is generally very close to the geometric<br />

mean of the ratios in its matrix row. The geometric mean is the<br />

9-40 Section 9 -- In Depth

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!