Logical Decisions - Classweb
Logical Decisions - Classweb Logical Decisions - Classweb
Figure 9-4. SUF curve resulting from a mid-preference level of 110 for a range of 80 to 160 hp. If you think that the smooth curve doesn't adequately model the decision maker's preferences, you can subdivide the range for the measure into multiple parts. For example, you could split the range at 110 hp and assess new midpoints for the range from 80 to 110 and for the range from 110 to 160 hp. This allows you to define multiple smooth curves for different parts of the SUF, and can result in a complicated but more true-to-life SUF curve. 9-20 Section 9 -- In Depth
Figure 9-5. Summary of SUF assessment process using mid-level splitting method. Section 9 -- In Depth 9-21
- Page 215 and 216: Figure 8-43. Example of Results::Co
- Page 217 and 218: Printing and Saving Windows You can
- Page 219 and 220: The dialog box will show you the fi
- Page 221 and 222: Figure 8-45. Dialog box for Edit::C
- Page 223 and 224: Changing the range for utility. You
- Page 225 and 226: Figure 8-50. Dialog box for Prefere
- Page 227 and 228: the current color for that type of
- Page 229 and 230: copies the selected objects to the
- Page 231 and 232: analysis with the skeleton analysis
- Page 233 and 234: Figure 8-55. Dialog box for File::I
- Page 235 and 236: the other measures. The measure nam
- Page 237 and 238: The idea of the Import Structure op
- Page 239 and 240: Next, LDW asks you if it should app
- Page 241 and 242: Other Options utility function for
- Page 243: In addition, the Window menu contai
- Page 247 and 248: In Depth Introduction This section
- Page 249 and 250: A third example is a portfolio deci
- Page 251 and 252: Each alternative has a raw score (c
- Page 253 and 254: into more specific goals continues
- Page 255 and 256: Measures in LDW You define measures
- Page 257 and 258: computed measure levels to common u
- Page 259 and 260: Converting the Measures to Common U
- Page 261 and 262: Figure 9-2. Example of linear (stra
- Page 263 and 264: For an example of the mid-level spl
- Page 265: Since U(L0) = U(80) = 0 and U(L1) =
- Page 269 and 270: describe two alternatives: A, which
- Page 271 and 272: with equal chances of 40 and 70 per
- Page 273 and 274: In the original formulation of the
- Page 275 and 276: 1 Equal Importance Two activities c
- Page 277 and 278: You begin the process by selecting
- Page 279 and 280: Figure 9-7. Effects of goals with a
- Page 281 and 282: 0.5. Then the weight assigned to "P
- Page 283 and 284: ! You can use the "Smarter Method"
- Page 285 and 286: allocates this weight before comput
- Page 287 and 288: nth root of the product of the rati
- Page 289 and 290: Figure 9-8. Summary of estimating t
- Page 291 and 292: on the decision maker's response, L
- Page 293 and 294: Figure 9-10. MUF assessment figure
- Page 295 and 296: Now think of adjusting P so that th
- Page 297 and 298: Another approach is to use the rang
- Page 299 and 300: Figure 9-12. Quantitative range vs.
- Page 301 and 302: If a measure’s range changes, LDW
- Page 303 and 304: Figure 9-14 is an example of the ov
- Page 305 and 306: Similarly, a single member can have
- Page 307 and 308: chance having 160 hp (the most pref
- Page 309 and 310: A probability of less than 0.5 for
- Page 311 and 312: Interpreting the Ranking Results LD
- Page 313: S E C T I O N Examples 10
Figure 9-5. Summary of SUF assessment process using mid-level<br />
splitting method.<br />
Section 9 -- In Depth 9-21
Change language