- Page 1 and 2:
Logical Decisions Decision Support
- Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Table of Contents
- Page 5 and 6:
Assessing Weights with Weight Ratio
- Page 7:
Assessing Interactions Between Meas
- Page 11 and 12:
Introduction Real decisions aren't
- Page 13:
S E C T I O N Requirements and Inst
- Page 16 and 17:
"Logical Decisions". This program g
- Page 19 and 20:
Quick Start Introduction This secti
- Page 21 and 22:
Defining goals and measures. In LDW
- Page 23 and 24:
Figure 3-1. The SUF for "Years of E
- Page 25 and 26:
weights of the measures. All of the
- Page 27:
S E C T I O N Basic Tutorial 4
- Page 30 and 31:
Figure 4-1. Tutorial overview. 4-2
- Page 32 and 33:
Now lets make sure the alternatives
- Page 34 and 35:
Assume you have decided that you wi
- Page 36 and 37:
Next we will enter the measures for
- Page 38 and 39:
Defining Preferences The alternativ
- Page 40 and 41:
1. Select the Assess::Common Units
- Page 42 and 43:
almost equally unacceptable, while
- Page 44 and 45:
1. Select the Assess::Common Units
- Page 46 and 47:
When you do this, the tradeoff grap
- Page 48 and 49:
1. Select "Performance" and "Price"
- Page 50 and 51:
8. Click on the "Equal" button to t
- Page 52 and 53:
Figure 4-11. Display generated by R
- Page 54 and 55:
Figure 4-13. Overall ranking for tr
- Page 56 and 57:
Figure 4-15. Graph showing sensitiv
- Page 58 and 59:
You can see the completed introduct
- Page 61 and 62:
Advanced Tutorial This tutorial sec
- Page 63 and 64:
Probabilities There is a problem wi
- Page 65 and 66: This information indicates that the
- Page 67 and 68: A uniform distribution is defined b
- Page 69 and 70: On the left is a list of the possib
- Page 71 and 72: Figure 5-2. Example of Results::Unc
- Page 73 and 74: screen a large database for the alt
- Page 75 and 76: 9. LDW will ask if you want to appe
- Page 77 and 78: commit to buying their truck before
- Page 79 and 80: see that the rankings for all the a
- Page 81: S E C T I O N Using LDW 1: Structur
- Page 84 and 85: The Edit::Insert option. The Insert
- Page 86 and 87: ! Summary -- view a dialog box that
- Page 88 and 89: structure like an organization char
- Page 90 and 91: If you check the Show Assessment St
- Page 92 and 93: saves it for later pasting. When yo
- Page 94 and 95: You can create a new Matrix view by
- Page 96 and 97: The quick entry view shows the alte
- Page 98 and 99: Structuring Goals The goals in an L
- Page 100 and 101: these two fields to describe each m
- Page 102 and 103: the hierarchy. In the Matrix view,
- Page 104 and 105: ! Point Estimate -- use a single nu
- Page 106 and 107: Figure 6-12. Example of a measure l
- Page 108 and 109: Figure 6-14. Example of a measure l
- Page 110 and 111: pass, LDW replaces each probabilist
- Page 112 and 113: Figure 6-17. Dialog box for definin
- Page 114 and 115: Figure 6-18. Measure Category Dialo
- Page 119 and 120: Using LDW 2: Assessing Introduction
- Page 121 and 122: Adding a Preference Set. You can ad
- Page 123 and 124: Overview of Preference Assessments
- Page 125 and 126: a constant change in utility. Linea
- Page 127 and 128: The options associated with this as
- Page 129 and 130: When you select the SUF::Delete Spl
- Page 131 and 132: measure (in terms of expected value
- Page 133 and 134: 1. If you have made any changes to
- Page 135 and 136: Figure 7-7. Dialog box for defining
- Page 137 and 138: ! Identify Outliers — Highlights
- Page 139 and 140: Alternative HD size Utility Mail Or
- Page 141 and 142: Assessing Weights The weights in a
- Page 143 and 144: method uses a geometric approach to
- Page 145 and 146: Figure 7-11. Assess tradeoffs dialo
- Page 147 and 148: improving its level on the second m
- Page 149 and 150: levels for the two members in the t
- Page 151 and 152: dialog box. If you click "Redo", LD
- Page 153 and 154: The up and down arrow buttons. Move
- Page 155 and 156: Then identify the member you would
- Page 157 and 158: Representatives are allowed for sub
- Page 159 and 160: tradeoffs based on the AHP weights
- Page 161 and 162: is defined, an additive MUF formula
- Page 163 and 164: MUF formula, meaning that the activ
- Page 165 and 166: ! Adjust Weights for Set C Only. Th
- Page 167:
S E C T I O N Using LDW 3: Displayi
- Page 170 and 171:
Each of these displays can be selec
- Page 172 and 173:
After you press Enter, LDW will dis
- Page 174 and 175:
were done against price. When you s
- Page 176 and 177:
Figure 8-6. Example of Review::Trad
- Page 178 and 179:
with the highest overall utility. T
- Page 180 and 181:
you select this option, LDW will di
- Page 182 and 183:
Figure 8-12. Example of Review::Wei
- Page 184 and 185:
Figure 8-13.Example of Review::Weig
- Page 186 and 187:
Figure 8-14. Example of Review::Wei
- Page 188 and 189:
! Rank Alternatives ! Stacked Bar R
- Page 190 and 191:
Figure 8-17. Example of Results::Ra
- Page 192 and 193:
Figure 8-19. Example of Results::St
- Page 194 and 195:
Figure 8-21. Dialog box for Results
- Page 196 and 197:
In the window, the upper pane shows
- Page 198 and 199:
Figure 8-25. Example of Results::Se
- Page 200 and 201:
Figure 8-27. Dialog box for Results
- Page 202 and 203:
Figure 8-29. Dialog box for Results
- Page 204 and 205:
most benefit for your costs. You sh
- Page 206 and 207:
have significance, they just make i
- Page 208 and 209:
Cutoff Summary The Results::Cutoff
- Page 210 and 211:
you will see. If you select the "Sh
- Page 212 and 213:
LDW displays utilities greater than
- Page 214 and 215:
You can view an alternatives compar
- Page 216 and 217:
individual contributions can be gre
- Page 218 and 219:
Copying Graphics Images to the Clip
- Page 220 and 221:
! Change the display for the common
- Page 222 and 223:
The "Number of Trials" edit box con
- Page 224 and 225:
Figure 8-49. Dialog box for Prefere
- Page 226 and 227:
than its original size. Zoom percen
- Page 228 and 229:
Modifying individual graphic object
- Page 230 and 231:
Figure 8-53. Text font dialog box.
- Page 232 and 233:
Loading an LDW Analysis You can loa
- Page 234 and 235:
! Update and Append -- both modify
- Page 236 and 237:
When you have selected the correct
- Page 238 and 239:
then click the field to use to upda
- Page 240 and 241:
The option then proceeds automatica
- Page 242 and 243:
Figure 8-60. Preferences::Automatic
- Page 245:
S E C T I O N In Depth 9
- Page 248 and 249:
On the other hand, the weights of t
- Page 250 and 251:
Identifying Alternatives Alternativ
- Page 252 and 253:
Identifying and Defining Alternativ
- Page 254 and 255:
of the hierarchy be made up of eval
- Page 256 and 257:
The default is that measure levels
- Page 258 and 259:
categories' sites. For example, the
- Page 260 and 261:
objective measure levels and the mo
- Page 262 and 263:
no intrinsically correct shape for
- Page 264 and 265:
this truck B, and call the change f
- Page 266 and 267:
Figure 9-4. SUF curve resulting fro
- Page 268 and 269:
Figure 9-5 summarizes the process o
- Page 270 and 271:
other measures, including cost, and
- Page 272 and 273:
The second parameter, local risk av
- Page 274 and 275:
Each cell in the matrix represents
- Page 276 and 277:
always a complete set of utilities
- Page 278 and 279:
The utility of an alternative on th
- Page 280 and 281:
Different preference assessment met
- Page 282 and 283:
similar but more complicated if the
- Page 284 and 285:
The first member to be improved is
- Page 286 and 287:
decision maker to state importance
- Page 288 and 289:
It should be easier for a decision
- Page 290 and 291:
Figure 9-8 shows how a tradeoff can
- Page 292 and 293:
Figure 9-9. Example graph for trade
- Page 294 and 295:
This dialogue let us establish a tr
- Page 296 and 297:
Changing Weight Assessment Methods
- Page 298 and 299:
Figure 9-11. Extreme example of the
- Page 300 and 301:
Thus, proportionally increasing the
- Page 302 and 303:
The level of big K can result in se
- Page 304 and 305:
levels on the two measures are requ
- Page 306 and 307:
A: I could see where some people mi
- Page 308 and 309:
A: Wow, that's pretty complicated.
- Page 310 and 311:
If you enter a small k greater than
- Page 312 and 313:
9-66 Section 9 -- In Depth
- Page 315 and 316:
Examples Introduction This section
- Page 317 and 318:
Figure 10-1. Goals hierarchy for co
- Page 319 and 320:
The next step was to assess prefere
- Page 321 and 322:
The first step was to identify a pr
- Page 323 and 324:
The definition of measures continue
- Page 325 and 326:
Construction Quality goal House Sel
- Page 327 and 328:
the task of evaluating potential re
- Page 329 and 330:
Many measures represented counts of
- Page 331:
Figure 10-11. Tradeoff "Bubble Diag
- Page 335 and 336:
Commands Summary AHP Menu This sect
- Page 337 and 338:
Edit::Add Lets you add a new object
- Page 339 and 340:
Help Menu File::Printer Setup View
- Page 341 and 342:
Main Menu Hierarchy::Show Assessmen
- Page 343 and 344:
Results Menu Preferences::Color Pre
- Page 345 and 346:
Review Menu The graph shows relativ
- Page 347 and 348:
SUF Menu Review::Weights::SUF Formu
- Page 349:
Window Menu your analysis. The many
- Page 353 and 354:
Glossary Active Member Alternative
- Page 355 and 356:
Destructive Interaction Efficient F
- Page 357 and 358:
Measure Category Member Monte Carlo
- Page 359 and 360:
Nominal Utility Point Estimate k i=
- Page 361 and 362:
Sample Small k SUF willing to accep
- Page 363:
Utility Weight number generator and
- Page 367 and 368:
Bibliography This brief bibliograph
- Page 369:
Appendix A
- Page 372 and 373:
for all measures i except 1 and 2.
- Page 375:
Index I
- Page 378 and 379:
probabilistic ..............6 - 29