06.07.2013 Views

2011 - Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences ...

2011 - Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences ...

2011 - Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

John Wahr<br />

Applications of Time-Variable<br />

Gravity Measurements from GRACE<br />

FUNDING: NASA, JET PROPULSION LABORATORY<br />

The GRACE (Gravity<br />

Recovery and Climate<br />

Experiment) satellite mission,<br />

launched by NASA<br />

and the German Space<br />

Agency <strong>in</strong> March 2002, is<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g global maps of<br />

the Earth’s gravity field<br />

to astonish<strong>in</strong>g accuracy<br />

every month. Because<br />

the Earth’s gravity field<br />

is caused by its mass distribution,<br />

time-variations<br />

<strong>in</strong> gravity as determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

from GRACE data can be<br />

used to estimate monthto-month<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Earth’s mass distribution.<br />

GRACE can recover mass<br />

variability at scales of<br />

about 250–300 km and larger.<br />

We have been us<strong>in</strong>g these data to look at a number of<br />

geophysical signals, particularly those that <strong>in</strong>volve the<br />

storage of water (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g snow and ice) on cont<strong>in</strong>ents<br />

and <strong>in</strong> the polar ice sheets.<br />

As one example, because of its large effective footpr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

and its sensitivity to mass, GRACE offers the best available<br />

method <strong>for</strong> measur<strong>in</strong>g the total mass balance of the<br />

polar ice sheets. Figure 1 shows monthly GRACE results<br />

(black l<strong>in</strong>e; the orange l<strong>in</strong>e is a smoothed version) <strong>for</strong> the<br />

mass variability summed over the entire Greenland ice<br />

sheet, between April 2002 and March <strong>2011</strong>. The trend of<br />

the best-fitt<strong>in</strong>g straight l<strong>in</strong>e is about 220 gigatons/yr of<br />

ice-mass loss, which corresponds to enough water each<br />

year to cover all of Colorado to a depth of almost 1 meter.<br />

There is a notable downward curvature to the results,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the mass-loss rate was <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

this time period. But hid<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d this reasonably simple<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle time series is a mass-loss signal of considerable spatial<br />

and temporal complexity. Figure 2, <strong>for</strong> example, shows<br />

how the mass-loss rate was distributed across Greenland<br />

<strong>for</strong> four two-year timespans, as determ<strong>in</strong>ed from the<br />

GRACE solutions. It shows the mass loss began <strong>in</strong> earnest<br />

<strong>in</strong> about 2005, <strong>in</strong> southeast Greenland. That region tended<br />

to stabilize <strong>in</strong> 2007, while at the same time significant<br />

mass loss appeared <strong>in</strong> the northwest. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the last<br />

couple of years, the mass-loss pattern reverted to someth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

closer to the 2005–2007 pattern. The ma<strong>in</strong> source of<br />

these dramatic mass-loss rates is <strong>in</strong>creased velocities of<br />

outlet glaciers. The GRACE results <strong>in</strong>dicate how volatile<br />

those velocities have been and suggest that the dynamics<br />

controll<strong>in</strong>g those velocities will be difficult to sort out.<br />

Figure 1: Monthly GRACE results (black l<strong>in</strong>e; the orange l<strong>in</strong>e is a<br />

smoothed version) <strong>for</strong> the mass variability summed over the entire<br />

Greenland ice sheet, between April 2002 and March <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Figure 2: How the mass-loss rate was distributed across Greenland <strong>for</strong><br />

four two-year timespans, as determ<strong>in</strong>ed from the GRACE solutions.<br />

CIRES Annual Report <strong>2011</strong> 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!