06.07.2013 Views

Characterization of an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS ...

Characterization of an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS ...

Characterization of an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

768 N. TAKEGAWA ET AL.<br />

TABLE 3<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> intercomparison results<br />

Fit parameters a<br />

Species Slope Intercept, µg m −3 r 2<br />

Nitrate 1.12 ± 0.03<br />

Phase 1 (May 10–12, 2003)<br />

0.33 ± 0.09 0.99<br />

Sulfate 1.24 ± 0.11 −0.34 ± 0.32 0.85<br />

Chloride 1.16 ± 0.05 0.10 ± 0.03 0.96<br />

Ammonium 1.26 ± 0.06 −0.38 ± 0.15<br />

Phase 2 (July 23–30, 2003)<br />

0.96<br />

Nitrate 0.81 ± 0.03 0.46 ± 0.18 0.95<br />

Sulfate 0.90 ± 0.06 0.44 ± 0.18 0.88<br />

Chloride 0.91 ± 0.05 0.07 ± 0.02 0.92<br />

Ammonium 0.95 ± 0.06 0.25 ± 0.17 0.89<br />

Org<strong>an</strong>ics 1.79 ± 0.29 0.98 ± 0.84<br />

Phase 3 (October 1–15, 2003)<br />

0.67<br />

Org<strong>an</strong>ics 1.61 ± 0.09 0.86 ± 0.52 0.83<br />

a Linear regression fit parameters <strong>of</strong> <strong>AMS</strong> versus PILS-IC or OC correlation. Errors are 95% confidence intervals.<br />

(dva < 200 nm) was dominated by aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbons<br />

that are the major constituents <strong>of</strong> combustion-generated<br />

primary org<strong>an</strong>ic aerosols <strong>an</strong>d that the accumulation mode (dva ><br />

200 nm) was dominated by oxygenated org<strong>an</strong>ic compounds that<br />

are the major constituents <strong>of</strong> secondary org<strong>an</strong>ic aerosols. The<br />

size distributions suggest that the former is externally mixed<br />

with inorg<strong>an</strong>ic species <strong>an</strong>d the latter is internally mixed with<br />

inorg<strong>an</strong>ic species (e.g., All<strong>an</strong> et al. 2003b; Zh<strong>an</strong>g et al. 2005a).<br />

Therefore, the <strong>AMS</strong> particle collection efficiency <strong>of</strong> 0.5 is a<br />

reasonable assumption for the accumulation-mode org<strong>an</strong>ics. In<br />

this <strong>an</strong>alysis we assume a const<strong>an</strong>t collection efficiency <strong>of</strong> 0.5<br />

for the small-mode org<strong>an</strong>ics as well as the accumulation-mode<br />

org<strong>an</strong>ics.<br />

Figure 7 shows scatter plots <strong>of</strong> OM<strong>AMS</strong> versus OC mass<br />

concentrations in July <strong>an</strong>d October 2003. In general, the mass<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> OM<strong>AMS</strong> were systematically higher th<strong>an</strong> those<br />

<strong>of</strong> OC for almost the entire dataset, which is expected since org<strong>an</strong>ics<br />

contain several elements other th<strong>an</strong> carbon (H, O, N, etc.).<br />

The linear regression slope was found to be 1.8 for July 2003 <strong>an</strong>d<br />

1.6 for October 2003. Turpin <strong>an</strong>d Lim (2001) summarized the ratio<br />

<strong>of</strong> OM to OC for various cases. The ratio <strong>of</strong> molecular weight<br />

to carbon weight is 1.2 for n-alk<strong>an</strong>es (C23–C34) <strong>an</strong>d 1.0–1.1 for<br />

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), while it reaches as<br />

high as 1.7–3.8 for aliphatic dicarboxylic acids (C2–C9). They<br />

suggested that the OM/OC ratio could be approximated as<br />

1.6 ± 0.2 for urb<strong>an</strong> aerosols <strong>an</strong>d 2.1 ± 0.2 for aged (non-urb<strong>an</strong>)<br />

FIG. 7. Scatter plots <strong>of</strong> <strong>AMS</strong> org<strong>an</strong>ics (OM<strong>AMS</strong>) <strong>an</strong>d OC mass concentrations in July <strong>an</strong>d October 2003. The data are 1-h averages. The shaded line represents<br />

the linear regression line. The dashed lines indicate 1:1 <strong>an</strong>d 2:1 correspondence lines.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!