06.07.2013 Views

Characterization of an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS ...

Characterization of an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS ...

Characterization of an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHARACTERIZATION OF AERODYNE <strong>AMS</strong> 767<br />

FIG. 5. Scatter plots <strong>of</strong> <strong>AMS</strong> versus PM1 PILS measurements in May (open circles) <strong>an</strong>d July (solid circles) 2003. The data are 1-h averages. The dashed <strong>an</strong>d<br />

solid lines represent the linear regression lines for May <strong>an</strong>d July 2003, respectively. Note that CE = 0.5 is assumed for all <strong>of</strong> the <strong>AMS</strong> inorg<strong>an</strong>ic species. The<br />

dot-dashed line indicates 1:1 correspondence line.<br />

these previous studies mostly focused on sulfate <strong>an</strong>d ammonium<br />

because the mass loadings <strong>of</strong> nitrate <strong>an</strong>d chloride were not high<br />

enough in m<strong>an</strong>y cases. The new finding obtained in this study<br />

is that the agreement between <strong>AMS</strong> <strong>an</strong>d PILS-IC for nitrate <strong>an</strong>d<br />

chloride is as good as sulfate <strong>an</strong>d ammonium.<br />

<strong>AMS</strong> versus EC/OC Analyzer<br />

Intercomparison <strong>of</strong> OM<strong>AMS</strong> <strong>an</strong>d OC measurements was made<br />

in July <strong>an</strong>d October <strong>of</strong> 2003 (Table 1), where OM<strong>AMS</strong> represents<br />

the mass concentration <strong>of</strong> org<strong>an</strong>ic matter detected by the <strong>AMS</strong>.<br />

Figure 6 shows average size distributions <strong>of</strong> nitrate, sulfate, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

org<strong>an</strong>ics for July 2003. In general, the size distribution <strong>of</strong> org<strong>an</strong>ics<br />

in Tokyo (versus dva)was bimodal in all seasons (Takegawa<br />

et al. m<strong>an</strong>uscript in preparation), as is <strong>of</strong>ten the case for <strong>AMS</strong><br />

measurements in urb<strong>an</strong> areas (e.g., Jimenez et al. 2003a; All<strong>an</strong><br />

et al. 2003b; Zh<strong>an</strong>g et al. 2005a). Analysis <strong>of</strong> the size distributions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the individual m/z sampled suggests that the small mode<br />

FIG. 6. Monthly average size distribution <strong>of</strong> nitrate (solid line), sulfate<br />

(dashed line), <strong>an</strong>d org<strong>an</strong>ics (shaded line) for July 2003.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!