A STUDY OF THE THEORY OF APPRAISAL FOR SELECTION By ...
A STUDY OF THE THEORY OF APPRAISAL FOR SELECTION By ...
A STUDY OF THE THEORY OF APPRAISAL FOR SELECTION By ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
preserved."52 Thus, the Report maintains that the traditionally<br />
accepted criterion of usefulness, in the context of research, is<br />
the primary method of selection. In its focus on historical<br />
value and future research use, the Report seems entirely<br />
oblivious of the debate that raged in Europe over the futility of<br />
predicting future research use, or of the concerns raised by<br />
Jenkinson regarding the intrusion of archivists in the creation<br />
process that can endanger the integrity of archives.<br />
The research and analysis of the Grigg Report is guided by<br />
its understanding of the greatest problem of the appraisal<br />
process: the lack of a method that can guide the selection of<br />
valuable records. A methodology of appraisal could be considered<br />
satisfactory only if it could overcome the problem of determining<br />
"in advance the potential value of documents to posterity for<br />
historical or other non-administrative purposes."53 The Report<br />
studied the three-step procedure used by departments for the<br />
selection of records for preservation and destruction in an<br />
attempt "to assess the efficacy" of the implementation of the<br />
historical criterion.54 The procedure included the preparation<br />
of the destruction schedule, an examination of the schedule by<br />
Inspecting Officers, and the execution of the schedule.55 In<br />
each phase of the procedure, the primary criterion for selection<br />
52 Ibid, 22-23, paragraph 37.<br />
53 Ibid, 20, paragraph 29.<br />
54 Ibid, paragraph 31.<br />
55 Ibid, 20-25, paragraphs 32-45.<br />
76