06.07.2013 Views

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evaluation of Transgenic Plants and Mapping Populations for Resistance to Insect Pests 63<br />

pests based on damage to bolls or pods. To overcome these problems, the test material can<br />

be evaluated on a visual damage rating scale of 1 to 9, taking into consideration the extent<br />

of leaf damage or recovery from insect feeding during the vegetative stage (on seedlings<br />

and leaves), numbers of fruiting bodies and their distribution on the plant, and the proportion<br />

of fruiting bodies or grain damaged by insects.<br />

Data can also be recorded on insect numbers, survival and development, fecundity,<br />

consumption and utilization of food, host selection and feeding behavior, numbers of the<br />

diapausing insects, etc. The following methods can be used to assess insect damage to<br />

evaluate the germplasm, segregating breeding material, mapping populations, and transgenic<br />

plants for resistance to insects.<br />

Visual Damage Rating<br />

1. Plants with little damage during the vegetative stage and damaged plants that<br />

show good recovery from insect damage, and/or fruiting bodies uniformly distributed<br />

throughout the plant canopy, and 10% of the fruiting bodies with insect<br />

damage.<br />

2. Plants with 10 to 20% damage during the vegetative stage and showing good recovery<br />

from insect damage, and/or large number of fruiting bodies retained on the plant<br />

with uniform distribution, and 10 to 20% of the fruiting bodies with insect damage.<br />

3. Plants with 20 to 30% damage during the vegetative stage, and showing good<br />

recovery from insect damage, and/or a large number of fruiting bodies retained<br />

on the plant and 20 to 30% of the fruiting bodies with insect damage.<br />

4. Plants with 30 to 40% damage during the vegetative stage with moderate recovery<br />

from insect damage, and/or moderate number of fruiting bodies retained on the<br />

plant, and 30 to 40% of the fruiting bodies with insect damage.<br />

5. Plants with 40 to 50% damage during the vegetative stage with moderate recovery,<br />

and/or nearly 50% of the fruiting bodies retained on the plant, and 40 to 50% of the<br />

fruiting bodies with insect damage.<br />

6. Plants with 50 to 60% damage during the vegetative stage, with low to moderate<br />

recovery, and/or nearly 40% of the fruiting bodies retained on the plant, and<br />

50 to 60% of the fruiting bodies with insect damage.<br />

7. Plants with 60 to 70% damage during the vegetative stage, with poor recovery<br />

from insect damage, and/or nearly 30% of the fruiting bodies retained on the<br />

plant, and 60 to 70% of the fruiting bodies with insect damage.<br />

8. Plants with 70 to 80% damage during the vegetative stage with very poor recovery<br />

from insect damage, and/or nearly 20% of the fruiting bodies retained on the<br />

plant, and 70 to 80% of the fruiting bodies with insect damage.<br />

9. Plants with 80% damage during the vegetative stage with little recovery from<br />

insect damage, and/or 20% of the fruiting bodies retained on the plant, and<br />

80% of the fruiting bodies with insect damage.<br />

Indirect Feeding Injury<br />

Measurements of insect damage to plants are more useful than insect numbers, insect<br />

growth, or development. Plant damage and the resulting reduction in yield or quality are<br />

important while establishing the goals of a crop improvement program. Measurements of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!