06.07.2013 Views

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56 Biotechnological Approaches for Pest Management and Ecological Sustainability<br />

TABLE 3.4<br />

Use of Excised Plant Parts to Evaluate Genotypic Resistance to Insect Pests<br />

Crop Insect Species Remarks References<br />

Cotton Cotton bollworm,<br />

Helicoverpa armigera<br />

Whitefl y, Bemisia<br />

tabaci (Genn.)<br />

Rice Striped stem borer,<br />

Chilo suppressalis<br />

Pigeonpea Pod borer,<br />

Helicoverpa armigera<br />

Chickpea Pod borer,<br />

Helicoverpa armigera<br />

Groundnut Pod borer,<br />

Helicoverpa armigera<br />

Peas Pea weevil, Bruchus<br />

pisorum L.<br />

Soybean Twospotted spider<br />

mite, Tetranychus<br />

urticae Koch<br />

Brachiaria spp. Spittle bug,<br />

Aeneolamia varia<br />

(Dist.)<br />

Lettuce Banded cucumber<br />

beetle, Diabrotica<br />

balteata Le conte<br />

Brassicas Mustard aphid,<br />

Lipaphis erysimi<br />

Strawberry Two-spotted mite,<br />

Tetranychus urticae<br />

A 48 h technique using VI instar larvae<br />

proved as reliable as the standard technique,<br />

but was faster and more energy effi cient.<br />

Detached leaf petiole embedded in 3% agar<br />

in 250 mL cup, and infested with 10 to 20<br />

neonate larvae can be used to evaluate for<br />

resistance to insects.<br />

First fully expanded leaf with petiole<br />

placed in water and infested with 10 white<br />

fl y females can be used to screen for<br />

resistance.<br />

Orientation and settling responses of the<br />

third and fourth instars on the stem pieces<br />

differed signifi cantly, and were correlated<br />

with feeding ratio.<br />

Detached trifoliate petiole embedded in<br />

3% agar in a 250 mL cup, and infested with<br />

20 neonate larvae can be used to screen for<br />

resistance.<br />

Detached 5 to 7 cm terminal branch<br />

embedded in 3% agar in a 250 mL cup, and<br />

infested with 10 neonate larvae can be used<br />

to screen for resistance.<br />

Detached leaf petiole embedded in 3% agar<br />

in a 250 mL cup, and infested with<br />

20 neonate larvae.<br />

Flat and swollen pods (20 mm long) can be<br />

used to evaluate peas for resistance to pea<br />

weevil. Dual-choice and no-choice tests<br />

can be used to identify genotypes resistant<br />

to B. pisorum.<br />

Excised leaf and intact whole plant bioassays<br />

did not differ for the variables measured.<br />

Excised leaf bioassay was easier to set up<br />

and monitor, and took 75% less space in the<br />

growth chamber.<br />

A small plant growth unit supporting a single<br />

stem cutting (vegetative propagule) infested<br />

with 6 adults or 10 nymphs can be used to<br />

screen for resistance to A. varia.<br />

Whole plants were more useful to evaluate<br />

lettuce cultivars for resistance to D. balteata<br />

than excised plant parts.<br />

Placing leaves in Hoagland’s solution was<br />

better for screening of Brassica germplasm<br />

for aphid resistance.<br />

Detached leaf in water supported by a<br />

fl oating polystyrene raft, with the lower<br />

side of the leaf facing downwards<br />

maintained the leaves in turgid condition<br />

for 4 weeks.<br />

McColl and Noble<br />

(1992)<br />

Olsen and Daly (2000);<br />

Sharma et al. (2005b)<br />

Ranjith and<br />

Mohansundram<br />

(1992)<br />

Saeb, Nouri<br />

Ghonbalani, and<br />

Rajabi (2001)<br />

Sharma et al. (2005b)<br />

Sharma et al. (2005b)<br />

Sharma et al. (2005b)<br />

Hardie and Clement<br />

(2001)<br />

Elden (1999)<br />

Cardona, Miles, and<br />

Sotelo (1999)<br />

Huang et al. (2003)<br />

H. Singh, Rohilla, and<br />

Singh (2001)<br />

Sonneveld,<br />

Wainwright, and<br />

Labuschagne (1997)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!