06.07.2013 Views

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

52 Biotechnological Approaches for Pest Management and Ecological Sustainability<br />

FIGURE 3.5 Headcage technique to screen sorghum for resistance to sorghum midge, Stenodiplosis sorghicola.<br />

(A) sorghum panicle at anthesis infested with sorghum midge females, (B) reaction to midge of a susceptible<br />

sorghum cultivar, CSH 1, and (C) reaction to midge of a resistant sorghum cultivar, ICSV 745.<br />

(Figure 3.5) or infl orescences of cotton, pigeonpea, etc. (Sharma et al., 1992, 2005a; Sharma,<br />

Pampapathy, and Kumar, 2005). Cage size and shape are determined by the type and number<br />

of test plants needed for evaluation. For valid comparisons, resistant and susceptible<br />

checks of appropriate maturity should also be included and infested at the same time as<br />

the test genotypes.<br />

Greenhouse Screening<br />

Screening for resistance to some insects can be carried out at the seedling stage in the<br />

greenhouse under no-choice, dual-choice, or multi-choice conditions, and has been utilized<br />

successfully in case of sorghum (Starks and Burton, 1977; Nwanze and Reddy, 1991;<br />

Sharma et al., 1992), rice (Medrano and Heinrichs, 1985; Heinrichs, Medrano, and Rapusas,<br />

1985), wheat (Webster and Smith, 1983), soybean (Fehr and Caviness, 1977; All, Boerma,<br />

and Todd, 1989), alfalfa (Sorenson and Horber, 1974), pearl millet (Sharma and Youm, 1999;<br />

Sharma and Sullivan, 2000), groundnut (Sharma, Pampapathy, and Kumar, 2002), and<br />

chickpea (Sharma et al., 2005a, 2005b; Sharma, Pampapathy, and Kumar, 2005) (Table 3.3).<br />

Screening can be carried out under no-choice (Figures 3.6 and 3.7) or multi-choice conditions.<br />

The test material can also be infested with insects under multi-choice, dual-choice,<br />

or no-choice conditions using cages of appropriate size. The test material can also be<br />

infested with insects at the susceptible stage without a cage. This approach is more appropriate<br />

to evaluate seedlings or small-sized plants, such as those of chickpea, saffl ower,<br />

cruciferous vegetables, etc. However, it may be a bit cumbersome to use the cage technique<br />

on plants with a large canopy, such as those of cotton and pigeonpea. The following procedure<br />

may be adopted to screen for resistance to insects under greenhouse conditions.<br />

• Raise the plants in the greenhouse as per recommended package of practices. Infest<br />

the test plants at the susceptible stage of the crop, for example, for chickpea, the<br />

plants can be infested with neonate larvae of H. armigera at 30 days after seedling<br />

emergence or at the 50% fl owering and pod setting stages; while for sorghum, the<br />

infestation should be carried out at 10 days after seedling emergence for A. soccata,<br />

and 20 days after seedling emergence with C. partellus, Mythimna Separeta (Walk.),

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!