06.07.2013 Views

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

478 Biotechnological Approaches for Pest Management and Ecological Sustainability<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Isozyme and protein profi les;<br />

Immunodiagnostic methods; and<br />

DNA-based methods.<br />

Molecular Tools for Diagnosis of Insect Pests<br />

Polymerase Chain Reaction<br />

Current molecular systematics depends on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifi cation<br />

of a few “universal” genes to provide phylogenetic data. However, the need for sequencing<br />

is increasing quite fast (Murphy et al., 2001; Wheeler et al., 2001; Philippe et al., 2004; Teeling<br />

et al., 2005), and expanding PCR approaches to a wider selection of genes becomes diffi cult<br />

because of the need to develop new degenerate primers for the amplifi cation of singlecopy<br />

loci.<br />

Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA<br />

Random amplifi ed polymorphic DNA (RAPDs)-based DNA fi ngerprinting has been used<br />

for insect diagnosis that does not require prior knowledge of DNA sequence. RAPDs provide<br />

a rapid means of identifying genetic markers to distinguish closely related species<br />

(Alvarez and Hoy, 2002). These markers are inexpensive, rapid, and easy to use when studies<br />

involve many insects. However, results at times are diffi cult to reproduce (Ellsworth,<br />

Rittenhouse, and Honeycut, 1993).<br />

Expressed Sequence Tags<br />

The expressed sequence tags (ESTs) provide a more readily available resource of genomic<br />

data (Rudd, 2003). Most publicly available ESTs have been generated for gene discovery or<br />

to complement genome sequencing efforts. However, species for EST analyses have rarely<br />

been selected based on taxonomic criteria, which limits their use for phylogenetic analyses<br />

and comparative genomics. A concerted effort to enlarge EST databases to encompass disparate<br />

taxa may alleviate these problems (Bapteste et al., 2002; Theodorides et al., 2002).<br />

The EST databases for the taxa specifi cally selected to obtain comprehensive coverage of<br />

Coleoptera, a group that includes nearly one-third of all known species of animals, have<br />

also been generated. A critical problem for comparative studies is that ESTs from different<br />

taxa may not contain overlapping sets of genes. The challenge of matching orthologous<br />

genes between taxa is amplifi ed by the low expression of many transcripts. Sequencing of<br />

tens of thousands of ESTs in Drosophila melanogaster Meigen (Rubin et al., 2000) and Bombyx<br />

mori L. (Mita et al., 2003) has fallen short of reaching a full complement of predicted genes.<br />

The EST databases are growing rapidly, with approximately 27.6 million entries in the<br />

GenBank as of June 2005 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbEST/). However, taxonomic<br />

coverage of the Class Insecta has been limited to eight of the 25 insect orders. The EST representation<br />

in insects has been severely biased towards Diptera, comprising 15 of 47 holometabolous<br />

insects.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!