06.07.2013 Views

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

440 Biotechnological Approaches for Pest Management and Ecological Sustainability<br />

Conclusions<br />

Genetically modifi ed plants have been released in several countries, but the regulations<br />

governing the use of transgenic plants vary considerably in different countries. The<br />

decisions that address the concerns associated with the application of biotechnology to<br />

agriculture must be science based. The regulatory agencies should assure credibility and<br />

use a rational basis for decision making. The approach to risk assessment and risk management<br />

is constantly evolving due to new types of products and the availability of scientifi<br />

c information. Long-term ecological risk can be determined from the probability that<br />

an initially rare transgene might spread into the ecosystem, resulting in vertical gene<br />

transfer as a result of gene introgression into feral populations, invasion of new territories<br />

as a result of introduction of an exotic species, and horizontal gene transfer mediated by<br />

microbial agents, or a combination of these.<br />

References<br />

Baker, H.G. (1965). Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In Baker, H.G. and Stebbins, G.L.<br />

(Eds.), The Genetics of Colonising Species. New York, USA: Academic Press, 147–172.<br />

Barrett, S.C.H. (1983). Crop mimicry in weeds. Economic Botany 37: 255–282.<br />

Beringer, J. (2000). Releasing genetically modifi ed organisms: Will any harm outweigh any advantage?<br />

Journal of Applied ecology 37: 207–214.<br />

Bruce, D. and Bruce. A. (Eds.). (1998). Engineering Genesis. The Ethics of Genetic Engineering in Non-<br />

Human Species. London, UK: Earthscan Publications.<br />

Chrispeels, M.J. (2000). Biotechnology and the poor. Plant Physiology 124: 3–6.<br />

Clark, E.A. (2006). Environmental risks of genetic engineering. Euphytica 148: 47–60.<br />

CEC (Commission of the European Communities). (1990a). Council Directive of 23rd April 1990<br />

on the Contained use of Genetically Modifi ed Microorganisms. Reference no 90/219/EEC.<br />

Offi cial Journal L117, Volume 33, May 1990. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European<br />

Communities.<br />

CEC (Commission of the European Communities). (1990b). Council Directive of 23rd April 1990 on<br />

the Deliberate Release into the Environment of Genetically Modifi ed Organisms. Reference no<br />

90/220/EEC. Offi cial Journal L117, Volume 33, May 1990. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the<br />

European Communities.<br />

Conner, A.J., Glare, T.R. and Nap, J.P. (2003). The release of genetically modifi ed crops into the<br />

environment. II. Overview of ecological risk assessment. The Plant Journal 33: 19–46.<br />

Crawley, M.J. (1986). The population biology of invaders. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society,<br />

London (Series B) 314: 711–731.<br />

Crawley, M.J., Brown, S.L., Hails, R.S., Kohn, D.D. and Rees, M. (2001). Transgenic crops in natural<br />

habitats. Nature 409: 682–683.<br />

Crawley, M.J., Hails, R.S., Rees, M., Kohn, D. and Buxton, J. (1993). Ecology of transgenic oilseed rape<br />

in natural habitats. Nature 363: 620–623.<br />

de Wet, J.M.J. and Harlan, J.R. (1975). Weeds and domesticates: Evolution in the man-made habitat.<br />

Economic Botany 29: 99–107.<br />

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). (1986). International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and<br />

Use of Pesticides. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization.<br />

Fitter, A., Perrins, J. and Williamson, M. (1990). Weed probability challenged. Bio/Technology 8:<br />

473–474.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!