06.07.2013 Views

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Applications of Biotechnology in Agriculture: The Prospects 25<br />

Marker-Assisted Selection<br />

It takes fi ve to six generations to transfer a trait within a species into high-yielding, locally<br />

adapted cultivars through conventional breeding, and one has to plant a large number of<br />

progenies to be able to select the plants with appropriate combination of traits (Figure 2.1).<br />

The improved lines developed then have to go through a set of multilocation tests, before<br />

a variety can be identifi ed for cultivation by farmers. This process takes a minimum of<br />

seven to ten years. Recombinant DNA technologies, besides generating information on<br />

gene sequences and function, allows the identifi cation of specifi c chromosomal regions<br />

carrying genes contributing to traits of economic interest (Karp et al., 1997). The identifi -<br />

cation of DNA markers for traits of interest usually depends on making crosses between<br />

two genotypes with substantial and heritable differences in the trait(s) of interest.<br />

Depending on the crop and traits involved, mapping populations are then derived from<br />

the progeny of this cross by selfi ng once, many times, backcrossing to one of the parental<br />

genotypes (BC), or subjecting plants to tissue culture to generate doubled haploids (DH).<br />

The major advantage of most mapping populations is that each line is homozygous and<br />

therefore can be multiplied indefi nitely through self-pollination. This then allows the<br />

population to be evaluated under many environments and seasons, facilitating a much<br />

more accurate estimate of phenotypic variation, on which to base the mapping exercise.<br />

Mapping populations also allow scientists from many diverse disciplines to study different<br />

aspects of the same trait in the same population. This approach can only be used<br />

when parental genotypes can be identifi ed with opposing phenotypes for the trait of<br />

interest. Interspecifi c crosses can also be used to good effect, but linkage maps derived<br />

from such crosses may have limited relevance in crop improvement programs (Fulton<br />

et al., 1997).<br />

Wide<br />

species<br />

Wide<br />

crossing<br />

Biotechnological applications for crop improvement<br />

X Elite line X<br />

Line with trait<br />

of interest X Elite line<br />

Hormones/<br />

embryo rescue/<br />

tissue culture<br />

F1 F1 X<br />

Recurrent<br />

parent<br />

F1 BCF 1<br />

*BCF n<br />

7–10 years<br />

Phenotypic<br />

selection<br />

Molecular<br />

markers<br />

F 6-8<br />

3–6 years<br />

BC 1<br />

BC 3-5<br />

Field<br />

evaluation<br />

Multilocation<br />

testing<br />

Conventional<br />

breeding<br />

F 5<br />

Improved lines<br />

Varieties with<br />

specific traits<br />

7–10 years<br />

FIGURE 2.1 Application of tools of biotechnology in crop improvement.<br />

Genetic<br />

transformation<br />

Tissue culture<br />

Transformation with<br />

novel genes<br />

Plant<br />

regeneration<br />

Bioassay<br />

Characterization<br />

T 1 - T 3-5<br />

Stable transgenic<br />

plants<br />

Field evaluation<br />

5–6 years

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!