06.07.2013 Views

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Transgenic Resistance to Insects: Nature of Risk and Risk Management 435<br />

given harm is not zero, for worst-case scenarios, the probability of occurrence could be taken<br />

as one and the focus should be on the potential detrimental consequences of the event.<br />

One of the concerns related to transgenic plants is the potential environmental harm if<br />

these organisms escape or are released into the environment. Harm can take many different<br />

forms from transient to permanent in time and space, and from local to global in scope.<br />

To defi ne harm, it is necessary to distinguish between the terms risk and hazard, which<br />

are often confused. Risk is the probability that a transgene will spread into natural populations<br />

once released, and hazard is the probability of species extinction, displacement, or<br />

ecosystem disruption given that the transgene will spread into the population (Muir and<br />

Howard, 2001a). Long-term hazards to the ecosystem are diffi cult to predict because not<br />

all nontarget organisms may be identifi ed, and the species can evolve in response to the<br />

hazard. An infi nite number of direct and indirect biotic interactions can occur in nature.<br />

The only way to ensure that there is no harm to the environment is to release only those<br />

transgenic organisms whose fi tness is such that the transgene will not spread, in which<br />

case the hazard, becomes irrelevant because the transgene is lost from the population.<br />

Hazard to the Environment<br />

Hazards posed by genetically modifi ed plants include the tendency of a self-pollinated<br />

crop to outcross because of self-sterility or any other factors. Or a plant may have a tendency<br />

to become a weed, yield toxic substances in the product, or change in the toxin(s) produced<br />

by the plant. Any of these attributes may pose a risk to people consuming the product,<br />

working with it, or to the environment. In the case of toxin genes inserted into crop plants,<br />

the range of the expressed toxin may be much wider than expected, with adverse consequences<br />

for nontarget organisms and the environment. Plants may also display a change<br />

in appearance, reaction to other biotic and abiotic stress factors, or the end use characteristics.<br />

However, it is not easy to measure weediness, as such characteristics are not easily<br />

defi ned. The ecological consequences in most cases are only qualitative and, therefore,<br />

risk assessment for genetically modifi ed plants requires a detailed assessment of the modifi<br />

ed plant in comparison to the plant from which it has been derived. The procedures<br />

adopted should also take cognizance of the environment where the plant is to be released.<br />

Pleiotropic effects of a transgene that have antagonistic effects on net fi tness can result in<br />

unexpected hazards, such as local extinction of the species containing the transgene (Muir<br />

and Howard, 2001b). If a transgene enhances mating success while reducing juvenile viability,<br />

the least fi t individuals obtain the majority of the matings, while the resulting transgenic<br />

offspring have low probability of survival, resulting in a gradual spiraling down of<br />

population size until both wild-type and transgenic genotypes become extinct (Hedrick,<br />

2001). Transgenes for pest resistance or stress tolerance can increase offspring viability and<br />

can also reduce male fertility (Rahman and Maclean, 1999). Extinction hazards in such<br />

cases are similar to the use of sterile males to eradicate insect pests. However, in the sterile<br />

insect technique, the sterile males have to be introduced repeatedly to cause extinction.<br />

Antagonistic pleiotropic effects of transgenes on viability and fertility represent a new<br />

class of “Trojan Genes,” which persist in the environment. Attempts to reduce transgenic<br />

male fertility that do not result in complete male sterility may increase hazard rather than<br />

reduce it. If any of the net fi tness components are improved by the transgene, while having<br />

no adverse side effects, the transgene will invade a population (Muir and Howard, 2001a).<br />

However, advantages in one fi tness component can offset disadvantages in another and<br />

may still increase invasion risk.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!