06.07.2013 Views

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Transgenic Resistance to Insects: Gene Flow 423<br />

Geographic Isolation<br />

Half of the pollen produced by an individual plant falls within 3 m and the probability<br />

of fertilization afterwards decreases slowly along a negative exponential of the distance<br />

(Lavigne et al., 1998). The percentage of pollen dispersal from B. napus in the center of a<br />

nontransgenic crop has been estimated to be 4.8% (Scheffl er, Parkinson, and Dale, 1993).<br />

In rape, pollen trap examination showed a close link between weather and pollen<br />

amounts transported from rape fi elds by wind. The degree of outcrossing depended not<br />

only on the pollen concentration in the air, but also on other factors such as the weather<br />

and the abundance of fl ower-visiting insects (Saure et al., 2003). The frequency was estimated<br />

to be 1.5% at a distance of 1 m and 0.4% at 3 m. The frequency decreased sharply<br />

to 0.02% at 12 m and was only 0.00033% at 47 m. No obvious directional effects were<br />

detected that could be ascribed to wind or insect activity. Pollen-dispersal distributions<br />

based on dispersal from whole plots instead of individual plants might underestimate<br />

the proportion of pollen that dispersed over average or long distances. For insectpollinated<br />

outcrossing crops such as radish, strategies other than distance must be<br />

employed to ensure complete isolation (Klinger, Elam and Ellstrand, 1991). Gaussian<br />

plume models, which take distance and wind direction into account, have indicated that<br />

small conspecifi c populations of Lolium perenne L. might, in some conditions, be swamped<br />

by immigrant pollen, even if they are not directly downwind of the source (Giddings,<br />

2000). In sunfl ower, gene fl ow decreased with distance. However, gene fl ow occurred up<br />

to distances of 1,000 m from the source population, indicating that physical distance<br />

alone may not prevent gene fl ow between cultivated and wild populations of sunfl owers<br />

(Arias and Rieseberg, 1994). Pollen dispersal from transgenic cotton is low, but increases<br />

with an increase in the size of the source plot (Llewellyn and Fitt, 1996). A 20 m buffer<br />

zone has been suggested to limit dispersal of transgenic pollen from small-scale fi eld<br />

tests. The border rows fulfi lled the purpose of serving as a pollen sink to signifi cantly<br />

reduce the amount of pollen dissemination from the test plot of cotton (Umbeck et al.,<br />

1991). In China, gene fl ow between cultivars of G. hirsutum is up to 36 m. A buffer zone<br />

of at least 72 m has been proposed as a safer distance to avoid gene fl ow. A minimum<br />

isolation distance of 1,557 m has been recommended to prevent gene fl ow in alfalfa.<br />

Complete containment of transgenes within alfalfa seed or hay production fi elds would<br />

be highly unlikely using current production practices.<br />

Use of Border Rows<br />

Barren zones of 4 to 8 m may actually increase seed contamination over what would be<br />

expected if the intervening ground were instead planted entirely with a trap crop.<br />

When trap crops occupied a limited portion of the isolation zone separating transgenic<br />

and nontransgenic varieties, the effectiveness of the trap crop depended on the width<br />

of the isolation zone. Gene escape was reduced when the two varieties were separated<br />

by 8 m, but increased the gene escape across a 4 m isolation zone (Morris, Kareiva, and<br />

Raymer, 1994). For relatively short isolation distances, the most effective strategy for<br />

reducing the escape of transgenic pollen is to devote the entire region between transgenic<br />

and nontransgenic varieties to a trap crop. There is a signifi cant reduction in pollen dissemination<br />

as distance from the test plot increased (Umbeck et al., 1991). Outcrossing<br />

decreased from 5% to 1% by 7 m away from the test plot. A low level (1%) of pollen<br />

dispersal was recorded to a distance of 25 m. The border rows reduced the amount of<br />

pollen dissemination from the test plot. Economic profi t can be maximized by removing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!