06.07.2013 Views

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Physico-Chemical and Molecular Markers for Resistance to Insect Pests 173<br />

rice lines possessing both early maturity and insect resistance (Tsuji, Saka, and Izawa,<br />

2003). The indica genotype was maintained in the upstream region of the Grh3(t) gene<br />

located on chromosome 6 of Aichi 66. Four genes condition resistance in rice to N. cincticeps.<br />

Gene Grh1 (green rice leafhopper) from the cultivar Norin-PL2 (Kobayashi et al., 1980), is<br />

located on rice chromosome 5 (Tamura et al., 1999). Grh3 is located on chromosome 6, and<br />

Grh4 on chromosome 3 (Saka et al., 1997; Fukuta et al., 1998; Yazawa et al., 1998). QTLs identifi<br />

ed by Fujita, Yoshimura, and Yashi (2003) coincide with each of these four resistance<br />

genes. The Grh5 gene located on the distal region of the long arm of chromosome 8 is<br />

tightly linked to markers RM3754 and RM3761, and can be used in MAS to breed for resistance<br />

to this insect (Fujita et al., 2006). The QTLs for Nephotettix virescens (Dist.) resistance<br />

on chromosomes 3 and 11 are very near to Grh2 and Grh4. The near-isogenic lines (NIL)<br />

containing both Grh2 and Grh4 express resistance to N. virescens (Wang et al., 2003, 2004).<br />

RFLP markers have been used to identify resistance genes in pairs of near-isogenic lines<br />

(NIL), each containing a single gene for resistance to the whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella<br />

furcifera (Horvath) or to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Ishiyama), and 78 F 3 families from<br />

the cross, TN1/IR36, segregating for fi ve single resistance genes (McCouch, Khush, and<br />

Tanksley, 1991). Location of the resistance genes in NIL pairs was confi rmed by using RFLP<br />

markers from putative positive regions as probes on segregating F 2 populations from<br />

crosses involving resistant isoline susceptible recurrent parent. Two RFLP markers were<br />

linked to Wbph1 for resistance to the S. furcifera, although the chromosomal location of<br />

the gene was unclear, since both linked markers were detected using multiple-copy clones<br />

as probes.<br />

Wheat<br />

Monosomic analysis has been used to locate a single, dominant, Hessian fl y, M. destructor,<br />

resistance gene (H13) in the D genome of common wheat germplasm KS81H1640HF<br />

derived from Aegilops squarrosa L. (Gill, Hatchett, and Raupp, 1987). Telocentric analysis<br />

was used to map the H13 gene on 6Dq (long arm) 35.0 ± 8.0 recombination units from the<br />

centromere. Dweikat et al. (2004) used a set of near-isogenic wheat lines, each carrying a<br />

resistance gene at 1 of 11 loci (H3, H5, H6, H9, H10, H11, H12, H13, H14, H16, or H17). These<br />

were developed by backcrossing to Hessian fl y susceptible wheat cultivar “Newton.”<br />

Eleven RAPD markers linked to the 11 resistance genes were identifi ed. Several of these<br />

markers can be used to determine the presence/absence of specifi c Hessian fl y resistance<br />

genes in wheat lines that have 1 or more genes for resistance. Linkage relationships among<br />

genes on wheat chromosome 5A that condition resistance to M. destructor have been identifi<br />

ed (Ohm et al., 1995). Testcross analyses indicated that six of these genes appear to<br />

occupy a single linkage block on wheat chromosome 5A in the order H9 to H15, H10, H17,<br />

H16, and H12. Gene H14 did not appear to be within the linkage block H9 to H12. Linkage<br />

analysis identifi ed one sequence tagged site (STS) marker, STS-Pm3, and eight microsatellite<br />

markers (Xbarc263, Xcfa2153, Xpsp2999, Xgwm136, Xgdm33, Xcnl76, Xcnl117, and<br />

Xwmc24) near the H9 locus on the distal region of the short arm of chromosome 1A, contrary<br />

to the previously reported location of H9 on chromosome 5A (Kong et al., 2005).<br />

Locus Xbarc263 was 1.2 cM distal to H9, which itself was 1.7 cM proximal to loci Xcfa2153,<br />

Xpsp2999, and Xgwm136. Marker alleles at loci Xgwm136, Xcfa2153, and SOPO05 909 were<br />

shown to be specifi c to H9 and not diagnostic to several other Hessian fl y resistance genes,<br />

and therefore should be useful for pyramiding H9 with other Hessian fl y resistance genes<br />

in a single genotype.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!