06.07.2013 Views

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Physico-Chemical and Molecular Markers for Resistance to Insect Pests 171<br />

2006; Yang et al., 2006). DArT markers are typed in parallel, using high throughput platforms,<br />

with a low cost. DArT fi ngerprints will be useful for accelerating plant breeding, and<br />

for the characterization and management of genetic diversity (Wittenberg et al., 2005).<br />

Molecular Markers Linked to Insect Resistance in Different Crops<br />

The linkage between quantitative trait loci (QTL) and molecular marker loci is determined<br />

the same way as phenotypic resistance is linked with the segregation of genes for resistance<br />

to insects. The QTL analyses allow the researcher to identify the loci from a group of<br />

polymorphic segregating molecular makers that contribute most signifi cantly to explain<br />

the phenotypic variation for biochemical or biophysical characters mediating insect resistance.<br />

A key component of QTL analysis is the calculation of a LOD (logarithm of the odds<br />

to base 10) score, a statistical estimate of the likelihood of recombination between two loci<br />

due to chance alone. The LOD scores indicate whether the two loci are likely to be near one<br />

another on a chromosome (at least in terms of recombination based genetic map, if not the<br />

physical map of that character) and are therefore likely to be inherited together. LOD scores<br />

of three or more indicate that the two loci are close to one another on a chromosome, that<br />

is, there is 1 in 1,000 probability of allelic association in the segregating population that<br />

occurs due to chance alone. The progress in identifying genomic regions associated with<br />

resistance to insects in different crops is discussed below.<br />

Cotton<br />

A molecular linkage map of Gossypium hirsutum L. has been developed with 58 doubled<br />

and haploid plants based on 624 marker loci (510 SSRs and 114 RAPDs). The 489 loci assembled<br />

into 43 linkage groups and covered 3,314.5 cM (Zhang et al., 2005). Another map has<br />

been developed based on RFLP markers in four mapping populations of G. hirsutum (Ulloa<br />

et al., 2002), which comprised of 284 loci mapped to 47 linkage groups with an average<br />

distance of 5.3 cM, covering 1,502.6 cM (approximately 31% of the total recombinational<br />

length of the cotton genome). The linkage groups contained 2 to 54 loci each, and ranged<br />

in distance from 1.0 to 142.6 cM. A total of 53 polymorphic fragments and 32 polymorphic<br />

loci, representing fi ve linkage groups, have been identifi ed in two F 2 populations of<br />

G. hirsutum [HS 46 MARCABUCAG8US-1-88 (MAR) and HS 46 Pee Dee 5363<br />

(PD 5363)] by using RFLPs (Shappley et al., 1996).<br />

The prominent effects of “Okra-leaf” locus (which is associated with resistance to<br />

bollworms) on chromosome 15 are modifi ed by QTLs on several other chromosomes<br />

(C. Jiang et al., 2000). Among the 62 possible QTLs (at LOD 2.0) for 14 morphological<br />

traits, 38 (61.3%) mapped to D-subgenome chromosomes, suggesting that D-subgenome<br />

of tetraploid cotton has been subjected to relatively greater evolution than the A-subgenome.<br />

Expression of the dense glanding (dg) (which contributes to bollworm, H. armigera and<br />

H. virescens resistance) mutant is confi ned to expanding leaves, internodes, and bracteoles<br />

(Vroh Bi et al., 1999). The ability to trace DNA segments of known chromosomal locations<br />

from the donor G. sturtianum Willis through segregating generations can be a starting<br />

point to map low- gossypol seed and high-gossypol traits. However, there is no evidence<br />

of association of dense glanding with 13 other mutant markers in G. barbadense L.<br />

(Percy, 1999).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!