06.07.2013 Views

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Physico-Chemical and Molecular Markers for Resistance to Insect Pests 159<br />

to H. armigera (Nanda, Sasmal, and Mohanty, 1996). Several morphological traits such as<br />

pod shape, pod wall thickness, and crop duration infl uence H. armigera damage in chickpea<br />

(Ujagir and Khare, 1988). Main stem thickness, leafl et shape and length, leaf hairiness,<br />

and peg length are associated with resistance or susceptibility to H. armigera, and tobacco<br />

leaf caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (F.), in wild relatives of groundnut (Sharma et al., 2003).<br />

The H. zea damage in tomato is associated with vine size and fruit number (Ferry and<br />

Cuthbert, 1973). Calyx texture, fl owering, and fruit skin thickness are also associated with<br />

resistance to H. zea (Cosenza and Green, 1979). Pubescence on the leaf tip is associated with<br />

reduced defoliation by H. zea, Spodoptera exigua (Hubner), and soybean looper, Pseudoplusia<br />

includens (Walker) in soybean (Hulburt, Boerma, and All, 2004).<br />

Leaf Hairs<br />

Leaf hairs (that do not produce glandular secretions) play an important role in host plant<br />

resistance to insects. Hairy cotton varieties are preferred by the cotton leaf roller, Sylepta<br />

derogata Fab. (Mahal, Dhawan, and Singh, 1980), cotton white fl y, B. tabaci (Ilyas, Puri, and<br />

Rote, 1991), and tobacco budworm, H. virescens (Lukefahr, Haughtaling, and Graham, 1971;<br />

Robinson, Wolfonbarger, and Doday, 1980). Glabrous cottons have 60% fewer eggs of<br />

H. virescens than the hairy ones. Some of the eggs laid on glabrous surface are also dislodged.<br />

Females of H. armigera also lay more eggs on hairy varieties of cotton compared to<br />

the glabrous ones (Natarajan, 1990). However, leaf hairs in cotton confer resistance to leafhopper,<br />

Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida (Sharma and Agarwal, 1983a) (Figure 6.2), and<br />

western tarnished plant bug, Lygus hesperus Knight (Benedict, Leigh, and Hyer, 1983).<br />

Similarly in soybean, H. armigera females laid three times more eggs on the pubescent lines<br />

as compared to the nonpubescent ones (Panda and Daugherty, 1975), but pubescent varieties<br />

are highly resistant to leafhopper, Empoasca fabae Harris (Kogan, 1982). Wild relatives of<br />

pigeonpea such as Cajanus scarabaeoides (L.) F. Muell. and C. acutifolius (F. Muell. Ex Benth.)<br />

Maesen with nonglandular trichomes are not preferred by H. armigera females for egg<br />

laying (Sharma et al., 2001). Rice varieties with hairy upper leaf lamina are less susceptible<br />

to the Asiatic rice stem borer, C. suppressalis (Patanakamjorn and Pathak, 1967), while wheat<br />

varieties with pubescent leaves are resistant to the cereal leaf beetle, Oulema melanopus (L.)<br />

(Wallace, McNeal, and Berg, 1974). Leaf hairs also confer resistance to the jassid, A. biguttula<br />

biguttula in brinjal (Gaikwad, Darekar, and Chavan, 1991), and to the mustard aphid, Lipaphis<br />

erysimi Kalten. in Brassica juncea L. (Lal, Singh, and Singh, 1999).<br />

FIGURE 6.2 Leaf hairiness in cotton associated with resistance to leafhopper, Amrasca biguttula biguttula.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!